Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 149

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 149

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

(e) If the board decides that the matter is of such a
nature that the interests of the institution will best be
served, it may limit the activities of the respondent.
It may do so by relieving the respondent of teaching
and/or administrative duties pending final resolution
of the conflict. However, contractual obligations of the
institution shall continue until the matter is resolved.
(f) The review committee shall proceed as follows:
(1) The committee shall hold its first hearing no
later than 60 days after the last committee member has been appointed.
(2) The chairman of the committee shall notify
the complainant and the respondent, at least 28
days in advance, of the date, time, and place of
the said hearing.
(3) If any part of the dispute involves a specific
question of doctrine or doctrinal application, each
party shall have the right to an opinion from the
Commission on Theology and Church Relations.
If it involves questions of Constitution or Bylaw
interpretation, each party shall have a right to an
interpretation from the Commission on Constitutional Matters. The request for an opinion must
be made through the review committee, which
shall determine the wording of the question(s).
The request for an opinion must be made within
four weeks of the final formation of the review
committee. If a party does not request such an
opinion within the designated time, such a request
may still be made to the review committee, which
shall, at its discretion, determine whether the
request shall be forwarded. The review committee shall also have the right, at any time, to request
an opinion from the Commission on Theology
and Church Relations or the Commission on Constitutional Matters. When an opinion has been
requested, the time limitations will not apply until
the opinion has been received by the parties. Any
opinion received must be followed by the review
committee.
(4) All hearings shall be private, attended only by
the parties and the witnesses who can substantiate the facts relevant to the matter in dispute. The
review committee shall follow the procedures set
forth in the Standard Operating Procedures Manual for this bylaw to be followed in the hearing and
shall establish the relevancy of evidence so that
each party shall be given an opportunity to present fully its respective position. In performing its
duty, the review committee shall continue efforts
to reconcile the parties on the basis of Christian
love and forgiveness. If a party is a board or commission of the Synod or its districts, it shall be
represented by its chairman or a designated member.

R e s olu t i on s

(5) Within 60 days after completion of the final
hearing, the review committee shall issue a written decision which shall state the facts determined
by the committee and the reasons for its decision
and forward them to the parties and the board
of regents. The board of regents shall then take
appropriate action, which shall be final.
(g) If the committee decides there is a valid complaint
(1) regarding matters under Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5
(1)–(4), it may take whatever action it deems
appropriate, including recommendation for termination of the employment contract;
(2) regarding matters under Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5 (5)–
(6), if the member of the institution’s faculty or
administration is a member of the Synod, it must
also refer the complaint to the district president,
who shall follow the procedure set forth in Bylaw
sections 2.14 or 2.17.
(h) At every stage of the above-described procedure,
all parties must be furnished copies of all documents
filed.
(i) Any decision made pursuant to Bylaw 3.10.5.6.9
shall be final and binding on the parties involved with
no right of further appeal.
(j) In consultation with the Commission on Constitutional Matters, the Board of Directors of Concordia
University System shall maintain and amend, as necessary, a Standard Operating Procedures Manual, which
shall serve as a comprehensive procedures manual for
this bylaw.
3.10.5.6.10
Each institution shall have established policies
and procedures related to salary, faculty organization,
faculty involvement in establishing institutional education policies, dispute resolution, modified service,
sabbaticals and leaves. It shall also have policies and
procedures related to student discipline.
(a) The salary schedules of all institutional employees
shall be fixed by the board of regents on recommendation of the president of the institution. The salary
schedules shall be established within the broad guidelines provided by the Board of Directors of Concordia
University System.
(b) The board of regents, on recommendation of the
president of the institution, shall establish an effective
faculty organizational structure.
(1) The president or his designee shall preside at
regular and special meetings.
(2) The faculty shall elect a secretary and provide
for the election of committees, consisting of faculty members or of faculty members and other
persons, who shall study, evaluate, and report to
the faculty on policy matters affecting the academic activity of the institution, the activity and
welfare of the members of the faculty, and the life
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

|

149