Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 148
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 148
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
(h) discontinuance of an entire division or department (e.g., modern foreign language) of a college or
university;
(i) reduction of the size of staff in order to maintain
financial viability in compliance with policies concerning fiscal viability; and
(j) discontinuance, merger, or consolidation of an
entire college or university operation.
3.10.5.6.6 The board of regents may decline to renew the
appointment of a faculty member during an initial-level-appointment period without a formal
statement of cause.
3.10.5.6.6.1
No member of the faculty on a continuing-level
appointment or on an initial-level appointment except
at the expiration of the term of appointment shall
be removed from the faculty either by ecclesiastical
authority or by the board of regents except for cause.
3.10.5.6.7 Positions of initial-level appointment as well as continuing-level appointment faculty may be terminated
by the board of regents under certain institutional
conditions that do not reflect on the competency or
faithfulness of the individual faculty member whose
position is terminated. These conditions are the following: (1) discontinuance of an entire program (e.g.,
social work, business); (2) discontinuance of an entire
division or department (e.g., modern foreign language)
of a college or university; (3) reduction of the size of
staff in order to maintain financial viability in compliance with policies concerning fiscal viability; and (4)
discontinuance, merger, or consolidation of an entire
college or university operation.
(a) In the event of termination of a faculty position
by the board of regents, a minimum of six months
advance notice to initial-level-appointment faculty and
12 months advance notice to continuing-level-appointment faculty must be provided the terminated faculty
member in writing.
(b) The opportunity to serve the college or university
in another capacity for which the terminated faculty member has credentials and qualifications shall
be offered the terminated faculty member if such a
vacancy exists at the time of termination or becomes
available within two academic years.
(c) In identifying which specific faculty positions are
to be discontinued or terminated, the board of regents
shall follow the guidelines and procedures of that institution’s reduction-in-force policy.
(d) A terminated position may not be filled subsequently by another person during the next two
academic years without first offering the last previous
incumbent who held the position with continuing-level
appointment status the position at his or her last previous salary plus average annual salary increases
provided to that faculty during the interim.
148
|
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s
3.10.5.6.84.1 A faculty member who is on a roster of the Synod
is under the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In
the event a member is removed from membership in
the Synod pursuant to procedure established in these
bylaws, then that member is also considered removed
from the position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the board of regents.
3.10.5.6.4.2
An appeal process following Concordia University System dispute resolution guidelines Standard
Operating Procedure Manual for Dispute Resolution
shall be in place for use by faculty members who wish
to challenge a termination decision.
3.10.5.6.9
The board of regents shall have authority to
investigate, hear, and act on any complaint arising out
of Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5.
(a) If the board of regents receives a complaint against
a member of that institution’s faculty or administration concerning any matter, including those specified
under Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5, it shall direct the complainant
first to meet face-to-face with the respondent in an
attempt to resolve the issue (in the manner described
in Matthew 18:15).
(1) The president of the institution shall assist in
this attempt.
(2) If the president himself is the respondent, the
chairman of the board shall act in his stead.
(b) If the complainant is of the opinion that such
informal reconciliation efforts have failed and there is
a wish to pursue the matter, the complainant shall prepare a written statement of the matter in dispute and
a written statement setting forth, in detail, the efforts
that have been made to achieve informal reconciliation
and forward such statements to the board of regents
and to the respondent.
(c) Within 21 days after receipt of the written statement of the matter in dispute, the respondent shall
submit a written reply to the board of regents and the
complainant. If the respondent fails to reply, the allegations of the statement of the matter in dispute shall
be deemed accepted.
(d) Upon receipt of a reply from the respondent, or
if no reply is received and the board of regents determines that all informal reconciliation efforts have
failed, the board of regents shall form a review committee of five persons (Matthew 18:16), which shall be
chosen as follows:
(1) Each party shall select one faculty member
and one regent.
(2) The Secretary of the Synod shall select the fifth
member by blind draw from the Synod’s roster of
hearing facilitators, who shall serve as chairman.
(3) The selection shall be completed within one
month of the date on which the board decides to
form the review committee.
R e s olu t i on s