Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 148

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 148

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

(h) discontinuance of an entire division or department (e.g., modern foreign language) of a college or
university;
(i) reduction of the size of staff in order to maintain
financial viability in compliance with policies concerning fiscal viability; and
(j) discontinuance, merger, or consolidation of an
entire college or university operation.
3.10.5.6.6 The board of regents may decline to renew the
appointment of a faculty member during an initial-level-appointment period without a formal
statement of cause.
3.10.5.6.6.1
No member of the faculty on a continuing-level
appointment or on an initial-level appointment except
at the expiration of the term of appointment shall
be removed from the faculty either by ecclesiastical
authority or by the board of regents except for cause.
3.10.5.6.7 Positions of initial-level appointment as well as continuing-level appointment faculty may be terminated
by the board of regents under certain institutional
conditions that do not reflect on the competency or
faithfulness of the individual faculty member whose
position is terminated. These conditions are the following: (1) discontinuance of an entire program (e.g.,
social work, business); (2) discontinuance of an entire
division or department (e.g., modern foreign language)
of a college or university; (3) reduction of the size of
staff in order to maintain financial viability in compliance with policies concerning fiscal viability; and (4)
discontinuance, merger, or consolidation of an entire
college or university operation.
(a) In the event of termination of a faculty position
by the board of regents, a minimum of six months
advance notice to initial-level-appointment faculty and
12 months advance notice to continuing-level-appointment faculty must be provided the terminated faculty
member in writing.
(b) The opportunity to serve the college or university
in another capacity for which the terminated faculty member has credentials and qualifications shall
be offered the terminated faculty member if such a
vacancy exists at the time of termination or becomes
available within two academic years.
(c) In identifying which specific faculty positions are
to be discontinued or terminated, the board of regents
shall follow the guidelines and procedures of that institution’s reduction-in-force policy.
(d) A terminated position may not be filled subsequently by another person during the next two
academic years without first offering the last previous
incumbent who held the position with continuing-level
appointment status the position at his or her last previous salary plus average annual salary increases
provided to that faculty during the interim.

148

|

2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

3.10.5.6.84.1 A faculty member who is on a roster of the Synod
is under the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In
the event a member is removed from membership in
the Synod pursuant to procedure established in these
bylaws, then that member is also considered removed
from the position held and shall be terminated forthwith by the board of regents.
3.10.5.6.4.2
An appeal process following Concordia University System dispute resolution guidelines Standard
Operating Procedure Manual for Dispute Resolution
shall be in place for use by faculty members who wish
to challenge a termination decision.
3.10.5.6.9
The board of regents shall have authority to
investigate, hear, and act on any complaint arising out
of Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5.
(a) If the board of regents receives a complaint against
a member of that institution’s faculty or administration concerning any matter, including those specified
under Bylaw 3.10.5.6.5, it shall direct the complainant
first to meet face-to-face with the respondent in an
attempt to resolve the issue (in the manner described
in Matthew 18:15).
(1) The president of the institution shall assist in
this attempt.
(2) If the president himself is the respondent, the
chairman of the board shall act in his stead.
(b) If the complainant is of the opinion that such
informal reconciliation efforts have failed and there is
a wish to pursue the matter, the complainant shall prepare a written statement of the matter in dispute and
a written statement setting forth, in detail, the efforts
that have been made to achieve informal reconciliation
and forward such statements to the board of regents
and to the respondent.
(c) Within 21 days after receipt of the written statement of the matter in dispute, the respondent shall
submit a written reply to the board of regents and the
complainant. If the respondent fails to reply, the allegations of the statement of the matter in dispute shall
be deemed accepted.
(d) Upon receipt of a reply from the respondent, or
if no reply is received and the board of regents determines that all informal reconciliation efforts have
failed, the board of regents shall form a review committee of five persons (Matthew 18:16), which shall be
chosen as follows:
(1) Each party shall select one faculty member
and one regent.
(2) The Secretary of the Synod shall select the fifth
member by blind draw from the Synod’s roster of
hearing facilitators, who shall serve as chairman.
(3) The selection shall be completed within one
month of the date on which the board decides to
form the review committee.
R e s olu t i on s