Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 147
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 147
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Lutheran Confessions, and the Synod’s doctrinal statements. The board of regents on recommendation of the
president of the institution shall appoint all full-time
members of the faculty. The Board of Directors of Concordia University System shall require certification of
theological and professional competency. All initial
appointments to college/university theology faculties
shall require the prior approval of the Board of Directors of Concordia University System. All other initial
full-time appointments shall require prior approval
of the board of regents and shall include a thorough
theological review involving the district president and
selected members of the board of regents.
(a) The terms and conditions of every appointment
shall be stated in writing and be in the possession
of both the institution and the prospective faculty
member before the appointment is consummated.
Limitations of academic freedom because of the
religious and confessional nature and aims of the
institution shall be stated in writing at the time of
the appointment and conveyed to the person being
appointed.
(b) When laypersons are employed in full-time teaching positions, they shall pledge to perform their duties
in harmony with the Holy Scriptures as the inspired
Word of God, the Lutheran Confessions, and the Synod’s doctrinal statements.
(c) The board of regents may decline to renew an
initial-level appointment of a faculty member at its
discretion and without formal statement of cause. If
reappointment to the teaching staff is not contemplated, the board of regents shall so notify the faculty
member in writing through the president of the institution at least six months prior to the expiration of the
current appointment. Notice of non-reappointment
shall be made at least six months before the expiration
of an initial-level appointment of a faculty member.
(d) The Board of Directors of Concordia University System shall state standards of good practice that
provide uniform procedures for renewing faculty
employment contracts.
(e) Each institution shall state policies regarding faculty appointments, employment contracts, contract
renewal, and contract termination for all employees
within Concordia University System guidelines.
3.10.5.6.43 A formal procedure shall be in place to carry out performance reviews for all faculty on a regular basis to
help faculty identify their strengths as well as areas in
which improvement is needed (formative) and to provide the information needed to make a decision about
future employment status (summative).
(a) Performance reviews shall be based on a set of
clearly articulated criteria that are shared with faculty
prior to their employment and current assignment.
(b) All faculty on initial-level appointments shall be
R e s olu t i on s
reviewed at least triennially.
(c) All faculty on continuing-level appointments shall
be reviewed at least every five years.
(d) The president of an institution may call for a formal review of any faculty member at any time.
(e) The review shall involve input from peers.
(f) A written summary of the results of the review
shall be prepared.
(g) The summary shall be shared with the faculty
member involved and he/she shall be given an opportunity to respond.
(h) A final decision about any action to be taken as
a result of the review shall be made by the board of
regents of the institution upon recommendation of the
president of the institution.
(i) An appeal process shall be in place for use by faculty members of a continuing-level appointment
(those who already have been granted continuing-level
appointment status) who wish to challenge a termination decision. The appeal may be about the substance
of the decision or the procedures followed in reaching the decision.
(j) Faculty members with an initial-level appointment
(who have no expectation of continued employment)
shall not be entitled to an appeal process following (or
prior to) a decision of non-retention. The only exception is that a faculty member with an initial-level
appointment may ask the board of regents to assure
that appropriate procedures were followed in reaching the decision or the basis on which the decision
was made.
3.10.5.6.54 Other than honorable retirement, termination of
faculty employment may only be the result of the following: The only causes for which members of a faculty
may be removed from office, other than honorable
retirement, are (1) professional incompetency including, but not limited to, the failure to meet the criteria
identified in Bylaw 3.10.5.6.2 (d); (2) incapacity for the
performance of duty; (3) insubordination; (4) neglect
of or refusal to perform duties of office; (5) conduct
unbecoming a Christian; and (6) advocacy of false doctrine (Constitution, Art. II) or failure to honor and
uphold the doctrinal position of the Synod as defined
further in Bylaw 1.6.2 (b).
(a) professional incompetency;
(b) incapacity for the performance of duty;
(c) insubordination;
(d) neglect of or refusal to perform duties of office;
(e) conduct unbecoming a Christian;
(f) advocacy of false doctrine (Constitution, Art. II) or
failure to honor and uphold the doctrinal position of
the Synod as defined further in Bylaw 1.6.2 (b);
(g) discontinuance of an entire program (e.g., social
work, business);
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s
|
147