Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2013 · 65th Convention, St. Louis › Page 147

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2013, Page 147

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Lutheran Confessions, and the Synod’s doctrinal statements. The board of regents on recommendation of the
president of the institution shall appoint all full-time
members of the faculty. The Board of Directors of Concordia University System shall require certification of
theological and professional competency. All initial
appointments to college/university theology faculties
shall require the prior approval of the Board of Directors of Concordia University System. All other initial
full-time appointments shall require prior approval
of the board of regents and shall include a thorough
theological review involving the district president and
selected members of the board of regents.
(a) The terms and conditions of every appointment
shall be stated in writing and be in the possession
of both the institution and the prospective faculty
member before the appointment is consummated.
Limitations of academic freedom because of the
religious and confessional nature and aims of the
institution shall be stated in writing at the time of
the appointment and conveyed to the person being
appointed.
(b) When laypersons are employed in full-time teaching positions, they shall pledge to perform their duties
in harmony with the Holy Scriptures as the inspired
Word of God, the Lutheran Confessions, and the Synod’s doctrinal statements.
(c) The board of regents may decline to renew an
initial-level appointment of a faculty member at its
discretion and without formal statement of cause. If
reappointment to the teaching staff is not contemplated, the board of regents shall so notify the faculty
member in writing through the president of the institution at least six months prior to the expiration of the
current appointment. Notice of non-reappointment
shall be made at least six months before the expiration
of an initial-level appointment of a faculty member.
(d) The Board of Directors of Concordia University System shall state standards of good practice that
provide uniform procedures for renewing faculty
employment contracts.
(e) Each institution shall state policies regarding faculty appointments, employment contracts, contract
renewal, and contract termination for all employees
within Concordia University System guidelines.
3.10.5.6.43 A formal procedure shall be in place to carry out performance reviews for all faculty on a regular basis to
help faculty identify their strengths as well as areas in
which improvement is needed (formative) and to provide the information needed to make a decision about
future employment status (summative).
(a) Performance reviews shall be based on a set of
clearly articulated criteria that are shared with faculty
prior to their employment and current assignment.
(b) All faculty on initial-level appointments shall be
R e s olu t i on s

reviewed at least triennially.
(c) All faculty on continuing-level appointments shall
be reviewed at least every five years.
(d) The president of an institution may call for a formal review of any faculty member at any time.
(e) The review shall involve input from peers.
(f) A written summary of the results of the review
shall be prepared.
(g) The summary shall be shared with the faculty
member involved and he/she shall be given an opportunity to respond.
(h) A final decision about any action to be taken as
a result of the review shall be made by the board of
regents of the institution upon recommendation of the
president of the institution.
(i) An appeal process shall be in place for use by faculty members of a continuing-level appointment
(those who already have been granted continuing-level
appointment status) who wish to challenge a termination decision. The appeal may be about the substance
of the decision or the procedures followed in reaching the decision.
(j) Faculty members with an initial-level appointment
(who have no expectation of continued employment)
shall not be entitled to an appeal process following (or
prior to) a decision of non-retention. The only exception is that a faculty member with an initial-level
appointment may ask the board of regents to assure
that appropriate procedures were followed in reaching the decision or the basis on which the decision
was made.
3.10.5.6.54 Other than honorable retirement, termination of
faculty employment may only be the result of the following: The only causes for which members of a faculty
may be removed from office, other than honorable
retirement, are (1) professional incompetency including, but not limited to, the failure to meet the criteria
identified in Bylaw 3.10.5.6.2 (d); (2) incapacity for the
performance of duty; (3) insubordination; (4) neglect
of or refusal to perform duties of office; (5) conduct
unbecoming a Christian; and (6) advocacy of false doctrine (Constitution, Art. II) or failure to honor and
uphold the doctrinal position of the Synod as defined
further in Bylaw 1.6.2 (b).
(a) professional incompetency;
(b) incapacity for the performance of duty;
(c) insubordination;
(d) neglect of or refusal to perform duties of office;
(e) conduct unbecoming a Christian;
(f) advocacy of false doctrine (Constitution, Art. II) or
failure to honor and uphold the doctrinal position of
the Synod as defined further in Bylaw 1.6.2 (b);
(g) discontinuance of an entire program (e.g., social
work, business);
2 0 1 3 C o n v e n t io n P r o c e e d i n g s

|

147