Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 127

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 127

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES

127

(LCMS) as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and
the applicable resolutions of the Synod.

(LCMS) as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and
the applicable resolutions of the Synod.

Congregations that are members of school associations
have primary responsibility for doctrinal supervision in
their local setting. District Presidents have responsibility
for doctrinal oversight of all members in their Districts, and
BFCS has responsibility for granting or removing RSO status. Because of the above-mentioned requirement, RSOs,
their related LCMS congregations, their Districts, and the
BFCS all have overlapping responsibilities in their relationships to each other. This resolution seeks to improve cooperation and communication and to address current concerns regarding these relationships.
WHEREAS, The BFCS document “Church Recognition of
Recognized Service Organizations” states that RSO school
associations are to affirm in their constitutions that they
“respect and will not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as set forth
in Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod” (V. A 1); and
WHEREAS, The report of the Task Force on Recognized
Service Organizations (Schools) identified “that in most
RSO schools great effort is made to respect and not act contrary to the Synod’s doctrine and practice”; and
WHEREAS, The same report identified that some RSOs
are not in compliance with synodical doctrine and practice;
and
WHEREAS, The same BFCS document, “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations,” requires each
LCMS District to monitor schools operated by an RSO association to “ensure that it respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of the LCMS as set forth
in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of Synod” (VI. C 5); and
WHEREAS, No uniform means exists by which the Districts are carrying out this oversight; and
WHEREAS, We desire to address these matters in a fraternal and pastoral manner; therefore be it
Resolved, That during each synodical triennium each
District President will form at least one committee consisting of one layperson, one pastor, and one commissioned
minister, who, along with the District President and/or the
District Executive for School Ministry, shall conduct an onsite pastoral visit of all schools operated by RSO associations with the purpose of encouraging and monitoring the
RSOs according to BFCS criteria; and be it further
Resolved, That the above described committee(s) shall
evaluate each RSO school within its District, using a uniform evaluation and monitoring tool developed by the
Board for Congregational Services considering the findings
of the RSO Task Force Report; and be it further
Resolved, That any issues of noncompliance such as
those identified in the RSO Task Force Report shall require
that a written plan be developed between the District President and the RSO, identifying a pastoral plan to resolve
all such issues of noncompliance; and be it further
Resolved, That this written plan include specific steps
and time frames. A copy of the written plan shall be sent
to the Board for Congregational Services which is responsible for granting and maintaining RSO status; and be it fur-

Congregations that are members of school associations
have primary responsibility for doctrinal supervision in
their local setting. District Presidents have responsibility
for doctrinal oversight of all members in their Districts, and
BFCS has responsibility for granting or removing RSO status. Because of the above-mentioned requirement, RSOs,
their related LCMS congregations, their Districts, and the
BFCS all have overlapping responsibilities in their relationships to each other. This resolution seeks to improve cooperation and communication and to address current concerns regarding these relationships.
WHEREAS, The BFCS document “Church Recognition of
Recognized Service Organizations” states that RSO school
associations are to affirm in their constitutions that they
“respect and will not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as set forth
in Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod” (V. A 1); and
WHEREAS, The report of the Task Force on Recognized
Service Organizations (Schools) identified “that in most
RSO schools great effort is made to respect and not act contrary to the Synod’s doctrine and practice”; and
WHEREAS, The same report identified that some RSOs
are not in compliance with synodical doctrine and practice;
and
WHEREAS, The same BFCS document, “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations,” requires each
LCMS District to monitor schools operated by an RSO association to “ensure that it respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of the LCMS as set forth
in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of Synod” (VI. C 5); and
WHEREAS, No uniform means exists by which the Districts are carrying out this oversight; and
WHEREAS, We desire to address these matters in a fraternal and pastoral manner; therefore be it
Resolved, That during each synodical triennium each
District President will form at least one committee consisting of one layperson, one pastor, and one commissioned
minister, who, along with the District President and/or the
District Executive for School Ministry, shall conduct an onsite pastoral visit of all schools operated by RSO associations with the purpose of encouraging and monitoring the
RSOs according to BFCS criteria; and be it further
Resolved, That the above described committee(s) shall
evaluate each RSO school within its District, using a uniform evaluation and monitoring tool developed by the
Board for Congregational Services considering the findings
of the RSO Task Force Report; and be it further
Resolved, That any issues of noncompliance such as
those identified in the RSO Task Force Report shall require
that a written plan be developed between the District President and the RSO, identifying a pastoral plan to resolve
all such issues of noncompliance; and be it further
Resolved, That this written plan include specific steps
and time frames. A copy of the written plan shall be sent
to the Board for Congregational Services which is responsi200l Convention Proceedings