Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 101

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 101

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

A Pastoral Reaction to Dr. Carl Fickenscher’s Essay
“Church Fellowship and Telling the Good News about Jesus”
In reading Dr. Fickenscher’s essay, I thought of a mother’s
love for her children. Dr. Martin Luther, in the Large Catechism, describes the church as “the mother that begets and
bears every Christian through the Word of God.”1
Having four children of my own, I have seen the loving
care their mother has shown them over the years. I have
seen the joy in her face at the knowledge that she is the
bearer of new life. I was present at the birth of our children
and saw the immediate bond that existed between her and
her babies. Her nurture of our children flowed out of the
fact that she was their mother and had a special and vital
relationship with them.
The church is the same way as the mother of God’s children. She rejoices at being the means by which God gives
life to His children through Baptism and the proclamation
of the Gospel to unbelievers. She approaches the subject of
giving life with joy and great zeal.
In the same way, the church, like earthly mothers, nurtures God’s children as a natural outflow of the fact that
she is their mother. She does not nurture them in spite of
her giving them life. She nurtures them because she has
given them life. Birth and nurture are not contradictory,
but complimentary.
The practice of church fellowship, the desire that people
receive the Word and Sacraments in a worthy and Godpleasing manner, is not a contradiction of our desire to “Tell
the Good News about Jesus”; it is a complementary part of
it. Pastoral care in teaching people the truth of God’s grace
is the heart and soul of evangelism. A mother gives food to
her baby for the benefit of the child. She does not give an
infant a large chunk of an apple, because the baby would
choke. Apples are obviously good. But in love for her children, a mother nurtures with what will be the greatest
blessing for the child at that time and stage of their lives.
This is the essence of pastoral care.
One of the things that has impressed me about my wife,
and her role as mother, is her willingness to sacrifice for
our children, often at her own inconvenience. In our practice of fellowship, the church should sacrifice to minister
grace to visitors. The church should find loving ways to
seek out visitors and minister to them, not have them seek
us out. Your congregation may want to have brochures that
explain the service for the day and give the Gospel reason
for why we hold our position on the sacrament. Our congregation has such brochures, entitled “What’s Going On
Here?” These explain our orders of worship and the reasoning behind our Communion practice. Our visitors have
found these very helpful. The response to our practice has
been very respectful of that practice and has led to good opportunities for witness.
Some congregations are afraid that those not receiving
the sacrament might be embarrassed because they sit there
while others commune. I am aware of a congregation that

excuses everyone prior to the service of Holy Communion,
after which the communicants return to the sanctuary to
partake of the sacrament. This places the burden on the
members of the congregation, not on the visitors. It removes the circumstances under which the visitor might feel
uncomfortable, while remaining faithful to Christ and our
confession of faith. If this is a fear your congregation has,
you may want to adopt this, or a similar practice.
People who bring visitors to church sometimes face a
personal dilemma: “Do I go to the sacrament and leave the
visitor sitting here?” When faced with this situation, most
people assume that they have only two options. One option
is to simply leave them. The other option is to try to get the
congregation to change their Communion practice. Are
these choices sacrificial? Do they inconvenience the member or the visitor? One sacrificial option is to take the time
to witness God’s grace in the sacrament and to ask for their
understanding. Another option is to commune at another
service, if one is offered, and simply sit with the visitor
through the service you have invited him/her to. Why would
anyone sit through a second service? It is inconvenient. But
what is our convenience compared to the souls of others? We
can, and must, be faithful to God as we administer the
means of grace. We can, and must, witness our faith by our
words and self-sacrificial love. Christ made Himself of no
avail for us. The church, as the mother of God’s children, responds to Christ by sacrificing for the sake of those we have
the privilege to share the Gospel with.
These are examples of how a congregation might place
any inconvenience regarding fellowship practices on her
own shoulders, not on those of the visitors. Look for how
you can faithfully nurture and reach out as you do the work
of evangelizing. We have received abundant grace from our
heavenly Bridegroom. He laid down His life for His bride,
the church, “that He might sanctify and cleanse her with
the washing of water by the word, that He might present
her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle
or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without
blemish” (Ephesians 5:26–27). We are that bride of Christ.
We respond to His act of love by offering ourselves as the
vessel through which He gives and sustains life. Giving life
to God’s children and caring for them through the means
of grace are not two tasks, but one. This is the great work of
evangelism. May God grant the church the love of a mother
as she participates in telling the Good News about Jesus.
David A. Shadday
St. Paul Lutheran Church
Indianapolis, IN

Notes
1. Martin Luther, “The Large Catechism,” The Book of
Concord, ed. Theodore G. Tappert (Fortress Press:
Philadelphia, 1959), p. 416.

101