Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 81

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 81

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

CONVENTION ESSAYS AND REACTIONS
This desire for unity and agreement in the teaching is
strongly reflected in Paul’s first letter to Timothy. Timothy
is to charge others not to “teach differently” (1 Tim. 1:3;
6:2–3) in a way that contradicts the “healthy teaching,” the
“healthy words of our Lord Jesus Christ.” By paying attention to the “noble teaching” and the words of the faith, by
giving heed to his teaching and persevering in it, Timothy
will save both himself and his hearers. In the context of
Timothy’s ministry in Ephesus, the dangerous errors in
view included various misuses of the Law, fanciful myths
and genealogies, false asceticism regarding marriage and
foods, and the like.
The churches in the New Testament along with their
teachers desired unity and agreement in their doctrine. We
may turn finally to Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, where
“churches” drop out of view and “church,” the one holy
Christian church, comes to the foreground. It is here in
Ephesians 4 that the unity of the faith is most explicitly
mentioned. Paradoxically, that unity is at the same time a
given, a reality, and also a goal; it is both a gift from God
and an achievement to be protected and preserved.
In Ephesians 4, Paul begins with a general exhortation
for us to walk worthily of our calling as Christians. He then
specifies how this is to be done: “by bearing with one another in love” and “by being eager to guard (or keep) the
unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” Bearing with one
another in love; love is to cover all that we do. Surely this is
a good word for us at any time. Surely this is a good word
for us gathered at a synodical convention. One could even
suggest that love through obedience to the Eighth Commandment might be especially appropriate. Have we always remembered to deal in love in matters of church fellowship? I doubt it. Is there opportunity for us to repent
and be forgiven and more forward in love? I should think
so. Because of God’s grace, we can begin anew, today, bearing with one another in love.
But the second phrase is intriguing: “being eager to
guard the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” The
“unity of the Spirit” is something that needs to be guarded,
even as it is something objective and unchanging that God
has established, just as Paul continues in the next verse.
The unity of the Spirit is based on unchanging objective realities: “There is one body and one Spirit … one hope of
your calling, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and
Father of all.” One faith—it’s a given.
But, read on, verse 13. In the church, God has also given
gifts: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers,
all toward a goal, verse 13: “until we all attain to the unity
of the faith,” with the result, verse 14, that we are no longer
“carried about by every wind of doctrine.” This is St. Paul’s
equivalent of Matt. 28:20: “teaching them to hold fast
everything that I commanded you to hold fast.” Unity in the
faith is a goal toward which the church must strive.
So, in the New Testament, the one body, the church and
the many churches has the same goal: unity in love and in
teaching the faith. This is a unity that Jesus both gives and
commands, an agreement that Paul seeks and to which he
exhorts. When there is disagreement, the New Testament
churches came together until there was unity. But what
happens when error persists?

81

III. The New Testament Churches
and Error
The New Testament knows, of course, about persistent
false doctrine and about dangerous teachers—wolves in
sheep’s clothing, the Lord Jesus calls them. On the last day,
these false prophets who may be known by the evil fruit of
their teaching will hear the voice of His condemnation, “I
never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness” (Matt. 7:23) John the apostle writes about those who
had left the church: “Children, it is the last hour; and just
as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it is the last
hour. They went out from us, but they were not really of us;
for if they had been of us, they would have remained with
us” (1 John 2:18). The error of these false teachers? “Who is
the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ?
This is the antichrist, who denies the Father and the Son”
(1 John 2:22). In his second letter, John warns once again,
“For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those
who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the
flesh” (2 John 7). Concerning such a teacher, John continues, “do not receive him into your house and do not give
him a greeting; for the one who gives him a greeting participates in his evil deeds” (2 John 10–11).
But what about other persistent error, other dangerous
teaching that violates the unity of the faith and contradicts
the word of the Lord? Here the New Testament’s direct testimony is limited, for the church was young and the turns
and tragedies of history and heresy still lay in the future.
But I can mention a very few errors, divisions that have
persisted between the churches and prevented unity for
hundreds and hundreds of years. These are matters that
pertain directly to the saving, healthy, life-giving Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Three errors will suffice to show the tragedy
of our current situation.
First, “Sola fidei”—through faith, alone. We are declared
righteous, we are cleansed, we are forgiven by God, and on
the Last Day we will stand before our glorious Lord as His
own dear children only, solely through simple faith, trust
in Christ Jesus and what He has accomplished on our behalf. Or is that right? The church of Rome says, “By faith.”
But then there is the “also,” the merit of good works that
must be accumulated: “Since the initiative belongs to God
in the order of grace, no one can merit the initial grace of
forgiveness and justification, at the beginning of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then
merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our
sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for
the attainment of eternal life” (Catechism of the Catholic
Church [1994 edition], para. 2010; emphasis original). Is
this the unity of the faith? In sorrow, we reply, “No.” Does
the error of the church of Rome bring confusion and harm
to dear ones for whom Christ died? In sorrow, we reply,
“Yes.”
A second example. How does God deliver His forgiveness
and strength to us in our lives as believers? Well, the Spirit
came to us when we were baptized, didn’t He? Didn’t He
actually come down and miraculously, supernaturally join
us to God’s own dear Son when we were baptized? Can’t we
200l Convention Proceedings