Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 172

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 172

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

172

RESOLUTIONS

(This resolution was introduced in session 5, when it was not
adopted [yes: 402; no: 694]. During the same session a motion to
reconsider was carried and the committee brought the resolution
back in session 9. At the request of the committee, legal counsel
for the Synod commented on IRS considerations. The resolution
was adopted by the required two-thirds vote necessitated by the
resulting change to Articles V and XII the Constitution of the
Synod [yes: 805; no: 294]. The final resolve is added as required
by Res. 1-02, adopted by the convention in an earlier session.)

the Constitution of the Synod and the required two-thirds majority vote was not received, the resolution failed to be adopted.)

To Place Directors of Family Life
Ministry on Roster

Rationale
There has been a proliferation of church worker categories added to the roster of the Synod. This creates confusion both within and outside the Synod. It would seem advantageous, therefore, to look at the possibility of
identifying only two categories of workers, without subcategories: Minister of Religion—Ordained, and Minister of
Religion—Commissioned; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod in convention direct the Board
for Higher Education to develop a set of criteria for admission to the category Minister of Religion—Commissioned,
which shall include all of the current and any subsequent
subcategories, and present a report to the 2004 convention;
and be it further
Resolved, That all action taken in this resolution shall be
used to help carry out “The Great Commission” and shall
not in any way detract or distract from the primary mission
of God’s kingdom here on earth. We will remember 1-02!

RESOLUTION 7-15
Overture 7-33 (CW, p. 249)
Rationale
The need for congregations and schools to provide ministry in the area of family life is steadily growing. In response to this need, the Board for Higher Education/Concordia University System previously approved the
establishment of a program of preparation in family life at
Ann Arbor.
The Family Life program is multidisciplinary, emphasizing theology, sociology, law, economics, and psychology. The
Family Life graduate will possess the theological, academic,
and practical training needed for providing specialized ministry to families in a variety of situations and settings.
Students preparing for the position “Director of Family
Life Ministry” will participate in a program of study that
conforms to the requirements established by the Concordia
University System for admitting, monitoring, and placing
church vocations students. The requirements for the study
of theology are the same as for Lutheran Teacher and Director of Christian Education students.
Family Life ministry programs on Concordia University
System campuses will maintain the academic standards for
program certification by the National Council on Family
Relations (or a similar certifying body), so that graduates
will also be eligible for professional licensure.
The Family Life ministry program has now been recognized by the CUS Presidents as a significant ministry that
will benefit the LCMS. It therefore seems appropriate that
the BHE/CUS Board approve the Family Life ministry program as a church work program and recommend it to the
convention for adoption as a church work program. Graduates of the program will be certified as “Directors of Family
Life Ministry” and entitled to be placed on the roster of the
LCMS as Ministers of Religion—Commissioned.
Resolved, That persons who are graduates of a Director
of Family Life ministry program recognized by the Board
for Higher Education/Concordia University System and
who are called by qualified LCMS entities be rostered as
members of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (Ministers of Religion—Commissioned); and be it further
Resolved, That the Secretary of the Synod be directed to
follow the established processes for bringing the Constitution and Bylaws into conformity with this resolution.
Action: Declined (5)
(This resolution was declared adopted by the Chair at the time
of its presentation and discussion [yes: 686; no: 410]. Because,
however, its terms necessitate a change to Articles V and XII of

200l Convention Proceedings

To Recommend Study of Simplification
of Roster Categories
RESOLUTION 7-16
Overtures 7-12, 7-31–7-33 (CW, pp. 241, 248–49)

Action: Adopted (10)
(The resolution was adopted without amendment [yes: 1,030;
no: 64]. The final resolve is added as required by Res. 1-02,
adopted by the convention in an earlier session.)

To Affirm Synod’s Official Position
on Church and Ministry
RESOLUTION 7-17A
Overture 7-39 (CW, p. 251)
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
(LCMS) has experienced during its history confusion with
regard to the doctrine of church and ministry; and
WHEREAS, Dr. C. F. W. Walther addressed this confusion
in 1851 through his Theses on Church and Ministry, which
were subsequently declared to be the position of the LCMS
in 1851; and
WHEREAS, The book The Voice of Our Church on the
Question of Church and Ministry, by Dr. C. F. W. Walther,
was published in 1852. The LCMS in convention declared
this book to be the pure doctrine (reine Lehre) of church and
ministry; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
meeting in convention in the year of our Lord 2001 affirm
the above referenced writings of C. F. W. Walther as the
definitive statement under Holy Scripture and the
Lutheran Confessions of the Synod’s understanding on the
subject of church and ministry; and be it further
Resolved, That the LCMS in convention reaffirm the decision of the 1852 convention in recognizing C. F. W.
Walther’s book, The Voice of Our Church on the Question
of Church and Ministry, as the official position of the
LCMS; and be it further