# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_2001_S127 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES 127 (LCMS) as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod. (LCMS) as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod. Congregations that are members of school associations have primary responsibility for doctrinal supervision in their local setting. District Presidents have responsibility for doctrinal oversight of all members in their Districts, and BFCS has responsibility for granting or removing RSO status. Because of the above-mentioned requirement, RSOs, their related LCMS congregations, their Districts, and the BFCS all have overlapping responsibilities in their relationships to each other. This resolution seeks to improve cooperation and communication and to address current concerns regarding these relationships. WHEREAS, The BFCS document “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations” states that RSO school associations are to affirm in their constitutions that they “respect and will not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as set forth in Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod” (V. A 1); and WHEREAS, The report of the Task Force on Recognized Service Organizations (Schools) identified “that in most RSO schools great effort is made to respect and not act contrary to the Synod’s doctrine and practice”; and WHEREAS, The same report identified that some RSOs are not in compliance with synodical doctrine and practice; and WHEREAS, The same BFCS document, “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations,” requires each LCMS District to monitor schools operated by an RSO association to “ensure that it respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of the LCMS as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of Synod” (VI. C 5); and WHEREAS, No uniform means exists by which the Districts are carrying out this oversight; and WHEREAS, We desire to address these matters in a fraternal and pastoral manner; therefore be it Resolved, That during each synodical triennium each District President will form at least one committee consisting of one layperson, one pastor, and one commissioned minister, who, along with the District President and/or the District Executive for School Ministry, shall conduct an onsite pastoral visit of all schools operated by RSO associations with the purpose of encouraging and monitoring the RSOs according to BFCS criteria; and be it further Resolved, That the above described committee(s) shall evaluate each RSO school within its District, using a uniform evaluation and monitoring tool developed by the Board for Congregational Services considering the findings of the RSO Task Force Report; and be it further Resolved, That any issues of noncompliance such as those identified in the RSO Task Force Report shall require that a written plan be developed between the District President and the RSO, identifying a pastoral plan to resolve all such issues of noncompliance; and be it further Resolved, That this written plan include specific steps and time frames. A copy of the written plan shall be sent to the Board for Congregational Services which is responsible for granting and maintaining RSO status; and be it fur- Congregations that are members of school associations have primary responsibility for doctrinal supervision in their local setting. District Presidents have responsibility for doctrinal oversight of all members in their Districts, and BFCS has responsibility for granting or removing RSO status. Because of the above-mentioned requirement, RSOs, their related LCMS congregations, their Districts, and the BFCS all have overlapping responsibilities in their relationships to each other. This resolution seeks to improve cooperation and communication and to address current concerns regarding these relationships. WHEREAS, The BFCS document “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations” states that RSO school associations are to affirm in their constitutions that they “respect and will not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as set forth in Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of the Synod” (V. A 1); and WHEREAS, The report of the Task Force on Recognized Service Organizations (Schools) identified “that in most RSO schools great effort is made to respect and not act contrary to the Synod’s doctrine and practice”; and WHEREAS, The same report identified that some RSOs are not in compliance with synodical doctrine and practice; and WHEREAS, The same BFCS document, “Church Recognition of Recognized Service Organizations,” requires each LCMS District to monitor schools operated by an RSO association to “ensure that it respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and practice of the LCMS as set forth in the Scriptures, the Lutheran Confessions, and the applicable resolutions of Synod” (VI. C 5); and WHEREAS, No uniform means exists by which the Districts are carrying out this oversight; and WHEREAS, We desire to address these matters in a fraternal and pastoral manner; therefore be it Resolved, That during each synodical triennium each District President will form at least one committee consisting of one layperson, one pastor, and one commissioned minister, who, along with the District President and/or the District Executive for School Ministry, shall conduct an onsite pastoral visit of all schools operated by RSO associations with the purpose of encouraging and monitoring the RSOs according to BFCS criteria; and be it further Resolved, That the above described committee(s) shall evaluate each RSO school within its District, using a uniform evaluation and monitoring tool developed by the Board for Congregational Services considering the findings of the RSO Task Force Report; and be it further Resolved, That any issues of noncompliance such as those identified in the RSO Task Force Report shall require that a written plan be developed between the District President and the RSO, identifying a pastoral plan to resolve all such issues of noncompliance; and be it further Resolved, That this written plan include specific steps and time frames. A copy of the written plan shall be sent to the Board for Congregational Services which is responsi200l Convention Proceedings