Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2001 · 61st Convention › Page 71
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2001, Page 71
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
a commission on an ongoing basis will enable the Synod to
fine-tune its Bylaws gradually rather than making sweeping changes. But it would be unrealistic to assume that neither this new commission, if the convention approves it, nor
any other overtures in 2004 will have proposals to make regarding restructuring.
I am of the opinion that it would not be good for the
Synod to adopt the recommendations concerning area VicePresidents. First, I question whether electing synodical
Vice-Presidents from areas, especially areas as large as
those proposed in this overture, will do the kind of good the
task force is hoping for. These men are Vice-Presidents of
the Synod as a whole, not representatives of specific regions. The national-level Praesidium differs greatly in its
function from any District Praesidium. Therefore, benefits
achieved by regionalization of Vice-Presidencies at the District level will not necessarily carry over to the national
level. I can envision that this Area Vice-Presidents proposal, if adopted, could prevent the Synod from securing the
best talent for its second through fifth Vice-Presidencies. It
might even have the effect of fragmenting the Synod into
four synods.
Likewise, I do not support the change proposed in how
we elect delegates to the national convention. I am opposed
to changing the current criteria for the composition of an
electoral Circuit, whatever it may be called.
71
Conclusion
Well, these are some of the thoughts I have had in connection with the issues you will be dealing with during the
course of the next 24 to 69 hours. The Convention Workbook
not only contains much material, but material that
may/could/will have an important effect on the future of,
and the future direction of, The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod.
There are times in life when each of us feels he or she is
somewhat insignificant when compared to other individuals. There are times when we feel that what we think or
say or do really makes little or no difference. And perhaps
more often than not, that is true. But this is not one of
those times. What you and your respective committees resolve upon as you go about and complete your recommendations to the other delegates to the convention in July may
have a very significant effect.
Therefore, I encourage you to be assured that the Lord
will guide you because He has promised that He would. But
at the same time, please take time in your respective committees to petition the Lord for that guidance, especially as
you wrestle with a difficult issue and then come to the time
of the plenary vote for decision.
May what we do here in the next hours be used by the
Lord to accomplish for and in and through this segment of
His church whatever it is that He wants to accomplish.
200l Convention Proceedings