Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1995 · 59th Convention › Page 166
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1995, Page 166
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
166
che synodical Board of Directors was advised that in
1991 the LCEF Board resolved to utilize the conflict of in-
terest policy adopted by the synodical Board of Directors
(see:response to recommendation 1 and exhibit 1 attached).
Unlike some other boards, LCEF Board members them-
selves sign a statement acknowledging they understand
and endorse this conflict of interest policy. The synodical
Board initially created the LCEF corporate entity and notes
that-LCEF is a board of the Synod:in the same manner as
the synodical Board of Directors and over the years has
been very cooperative in the development and implementa-
tion of common policy and in enhancing the ministry of the
Synod at all levels. The Board is pleased the Task Force
concluded that “it appears to the task force that the finan-
cial condition of LCEF is sound and that adequate finan-
cial and investment controls exist.” The Board, however,
encourages the LCEF to broadly share how it has kept costs
down through the use of outside consultants and brokers.
Task Force Recommendation 21
That a cost/benefit analysis be conducted to determine
the benefit of further outsourcing of Worker Benefit Plans
operations (WORKER BENEFIT PLANS, p. 13)
“The Board appoints the Board.of Managers of the
Worker Benefit Plans and is pleased “the Task Force favor-
' ably acknowledges the financial reporting and overall man-
agement of the Worker Benefit Plans” and concluded “De-
termined efforts are being made to address cost
containment while maintaining a level of service which is
generally superior to insurance plans outside the church.”
The Board concurs with outsourcing Worker Benefit Plan
operations where practical. In 1991 the Board of Managers,
with the approval of the synodical Board of Directors,
began outsourcing certain operations of the Concordia
Health Plan. Effective Jan. 1, 1992, all prescription claims
were outsourced to Caremark and all mental-health or sub-
stance-abuse treatment was outsourced to Preferred Health
Care. In March 1993 the Board approved outsourcing all
other medical treatment to the Prudential Plus/PruCare
Plus Networks for managed care in those areas where the
Prudential network is available. This network, effective
July 1, 1993, in St. Louis and Jan. 1, 1994, in other areas,
covers about half of the active workers covered in the Con-
cordia Health Plan. The Board of Managers is continuing
to explore outsourcing options in those areas where Pru-
dential does not operate. The Board believes there would
not be an economic or service benefit from outsourcing the
Concordia Retirement Plan, the Concordia Disability Plan,
and the Pension Plan for Pastors and Teachers.
‘Task Force Recommendation 22
That the Board of Directors of Concordia Retirement
Plan investigate the potential for reduced premiums in light
of overfunding (WORKER BENEFIT PLANS, p. 13)
The Board concurs with the reduction in premiums as
of Jan. 1, 1994, in light of overfunding. Earlier this year,
the Board of Managers, after several years of study, ad-
vised the synodical Board of Directors of its intent to both
lower premiums and increase benefits under the Concordia
Retirement Plan. The executive director of the Worker Ben-
LATE REPORTS AND OVERTURES
efit Plans advised the Task Force of the intent to take this
action.
Board of Directors
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
To Continue the Synodical
Commission on Worship |
WHEREAS, The 1992 Pittsburgh Convention of the Synod
(Res. 2-02) resolved that the Commission on Worship be re-
tained as a self-standing commission and urged the Board
of Directors to provide funding for full-time staff; and
WHEREAS, Pittsburgh 4-02A placed the Commission on
Worship in the Congregational Services Conference, i ignor-
ing the mandate of 2-02; and
WHEREAS, Worship is not a program of the Synod, but
the very core of the Christian faith since the Confessions of
our church identify true worship as faith; and
WHEREAS, The Commission on Worship is not a program.
commission but is concerned with the life and teaching of
our church (Bylaw 3.928); therefore be it
Resolved, That the Commission on Worship be attached
directly to the Office of the President of Synod in his capac-
ity as supervisor of doctrine; and be it further
Resolved, That the 1995 convention of the Synod man-
date immediate full staffing for the Commission on Wor-
ship.
English District
Board of Directors
Mid-South District.
L5-32
To Require Concordia Retirement Plan to
Provide Annual Cost-of-Living Increases
WHEREAS, The purpose and intention of the Concordia
Retirement Plan (CRP) is to provide a retirement of secu-
rity and dignity for the Synod’s workers at a level at least
commensurate with their concluding full-service years; and
WHEREAS, Prudent financial retirement planning advises
provision to age 85 years; and
WHEREAS, The life expectancy of the Plan’s participants
is likely 20-25 years beyond retirement; and
WHEREAS, Even a modest annual inflation rate over a
20-25 year span of retirement will gravely erode the pur-
chasing power of the retiree; and
WHEREAS, The Concordia Retirement Plan is profoundly
funded with superior performing assets; therefore be it
Resolved, That the English District memorializes the
Synod at its next convention in 1995 to require the Concor-
dia Retirement Plan to provide an annual cost-of-living in-
crease that will at least equal the national rate of inflation. -
N
English District’
Board of Directors.