Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1995 · 59th Convention › Page 94
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1995, Page 94
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
94 ; , CONVENTION ESSAYS -
ticular pastor, congregation, District, or program board of
Synod. “Those are my donors,” seems to be-the statement
heard from many quarters today. i ss
*‘Not so surprisingly, the church has changed as well. Not
many years ago the LCMS had two very important, highly
successful capital campaigns: “Forward in Remembrance”
and “Alive in Christ.” At the time they were conducted,
they were the largest, most successful campaigns ever done
by a mainline church. Their efforts funded missions and
programs of the church for years.
If you look closely at those.campaigns, you find that only
about one third of LCMS member congregations took an ac-
tive part in them. Now-as we look toward the 150th an-
niversary celebration of Synod, “Sent Forth by God’s Bless-
ing,” the clear, consistent. word from the Districts is this:
“Don’t have a capital campaign.” . :
_ It’s a good word; in my estimation the right word. Chris-
tian stewards are closely connected to their local church,
closely connected with particular area, national, and inter-
national ministries with which they identify. It’s not a time
for capital campaigns. And, frankly, there isn’t the associa-
tion, affiliation, or confidence in national organizations that
there once was. This holds just as true for a mainline de-
nomination as any other major organization.
What surprises me is not that the “noncampaign word”
came to Synod from the Districts. (That’s the right word,
the expected one.) What’s surprising is that, even as we
speak, that word came at a time many Districts are run-
ning their own capital campaigns or planning to do so!
In the best. understanding of this most unusual situa-
tion, many Districts are providing magnetic opportunities
for Christians to grow in giving through these campaigns.
In the worst scenario there are some who still believe
Synod’s 150th will be a money-driven campaign disguised
under outreach discussions, and Districts want to “get the
money” before someone else does.
- What Hasn’t Changed
in Christian Giving?
But, we don’t own donors. We don’t own Christians or
their contributions. The Lord owns them. In fact, He owns
us twice over: once through creation; once through redemp-
tion. So when we sing, “The earth is the LoRD’s and the full-
ness thereof,” we see.ourselves redeemed, restored, forgiven
to live our lives to the glory of God. We want to make a dif-
ference. We want to use our God-given gifts in ways He will
bless. And let it be noted that we want to do this. We've
gone beyond the point where we wish to allow even well-
meaning leaders to decide for us how our dollars will be
spent. ;
Basic to all of this discussion is how we view wealth or
assets. If anyone assumes there is one large pool of wealth
and every institution of need dips a cup into the pool until
all the wealth is gone, that’s not surprising. It’s only unfor-
tunate. It’s a concept based on limited knowledge—perhaps
an even more limited belief in Christian stewardship.
We are not stagnant-pool people. We are streams-of-liv-
ing, water people. The joyful task of the steward is to con-
nect with godly opportunities as God gives direction. The
task of all those hundreds of thousands of potential recipi-
ents out there is to clearly focus on what's important, where
the opportunities lie, and how your gift or mine can make a
difference. ne
This pool will not be emptied. The wealth with which
God has blessed us in this country is beyond belief. The En-
vironmental Protection Agency tells us the. United States
leads the world in waste production! We generate some 200
million tons a year, enough to fill a convoy of garbage
trucks stretching eight times around the globe. We are,
says Noel Grove, “the Saudi Arabia of trash.”
The issue is not whether or not there are enough re-
sources to carry out the Great Commission. The issue is
how we Christian stewards connect to God given opportu-
nities to make a difference for Him. To understand that
concern we will be helped by looking at the early church.
How Can Christian Stewards Connect
. with Opportunities?
Let’s briefly examine the congregation at Antioch to see
how the early Christians operated. (In fact it was in Anti-
och that disciples were first called Christians.)
¢ They were courageous and forgiving.
¢ They were growing in the Word.
* They were growing in outreach.
° They grew in giving.
This was the congregation that fetched the converted
Saul to their faith community. That, in itself, was an act of
faith. For over a year they engaged in teaching (and, ’m
certain, planning and financing). They listened to the
prophets and took their words seriously. They looked out-
side themselves in two very focused and positive ways: (1)
They were the sending congregation and the support struc-
ture for Paul’s missionary journeys. In other words, they
lived for outreach. (2) It was from this place that the special
offering for the poor began.
- The offering for the poor was designated giving. And, it
‘was most significant. It was pervasive in those areas of
Paul’s ministry and second only to the Gospel itself in
Paul’s mind. In Galatians, Paul says he was very eager to
do it. Not only is it mentioned in Acts and Galatians but
throughout the New Testament. It also was a uniquely
structured offering: From the Gentile Christians for the
Jewish Christians. At a time when history, pride, and the
emotions of lineage ran high, the Antioch congregation and
Paul were employed in three important aspects of ministry:
(1) they were preaching the Word; (2) they were encourag-
ing Christians to support a major relief effort; (3) through
efforts 1 and 2 they were tying former Jews and former .
Gentiles together in the body of Christ as brothers and sis- °
ters,
Remarkably, the New Testament tells us more about
designated giving than it does of the “routine” financing of
a congregation or a national church body. On the “routine”
side we know, for example, that salaries were paid (“the
workman is worthy of his hire”), that Christians mutually
supported the church (“they held all things in common”),
and that tentmaker Paul assisted the work with his own
skills. But we don’t have a lot of details on these items. On
the other hand, many books of the New Testament mention