Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Page 211
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Page 211
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Sheet 45
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Sheet 49
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Sheet 59
Page 58
Sheet 61
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Sheet 81
Sheet 82
Sheet 83
Sheet 84
Sheet 85
Sheet 86
Sheet 87
Sheet 88
Sheet 89
Sheet 90
Sheet 91
Sheet 92
Sheet 93
Sheet 94
Sheet 95
Sheet 96
Sheet 97
Sheet 98
Sheet 99
Sheet 100
Sheet 101
Page 3
Sheet 103
Sheet 104
Sheet 105
Sheet 106
Sheet 107
Sheet 108
Sheet 109
Sheet 110
Sheet 111
Sheet 112
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Sheet 115
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Sheet 118
Sheet 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HUMAN CARE 211
an adult member of his family, by the board of elders
or the church council of his congregation, or by the syn-
odical or District board which is his ecclesiastical em-
ployer.
3. The District commission shal! be authorized to use
the professional consultative services needed to estab-
lish the facts in the situation. Subject to prevailing legal
limitations regarding the necessary consent of a party
to comprehensive or special medical examinations, the
commission may secure a prognosis and recommend a
program of remedial or supportive care. The commission
may propose vocational redirection or guidance into a
more suitable work situation.
4. The District commission shall have the authority
to recommend to the District President specific courses
of action. The District President shall have authority to
place a disabled church worker temporarily on a c.r.m.
or leave of absence status.
5. The Board of Managers of Concordia Plans and
the Board of World Relief, respectively, may be asked
to offer assistance and support in the care of the worker
and the dependents in an individual case.
6. Reports on individual cases shall be made an-
nually to the synodical President, who shall also refer
cases of appeal from the decision of a District commis-
sion to the synodical Commission on Ministerial Health.
PROPOSED WORDING
a. The commission shall—
1. Develop health programs for professional church
workers;
2. Assist districts in establishing and maintaining
commissions on ministerial health;
3. Make available qualified persons and materials
for conducting seminars on ministering to conflict.
b. The district commission shall—
1. Be charged with the responsibility of receiving,
investigating, and considering petitions from or com-
plaints concerning the alleged disability of a profes-
sional church worker. These requests may be initiated
in writing by the worker, by a member of his family, by
the board of elders or the church council of his congre-
gation, or by the synodical or district board that is his
employer.
2. Be authorized to use the professional consultative
services needed to establish the facts in the situation.
Subject to prevailing legal limitations regarding the
necessary consent of a party to comprehensive or special
medical examinations, the commission may secure a
prognosis and recommend a program of remedial or sup-
portive care. The commission may propose vocational
redirection or guidance into a more suitable work sit-
uation.
3. Shall have the authority to recommend to the dis-
trict president specific courses of action. The district
president shall have authority to place a disabled
church worker temporarily on candidate status, grant
a leave of absence, or place the worker on restricted
status.
c. The Board of Managers of the Concordia Plans and
the Board of World Relief, respectively, may be asked
to offer assistance and support in the care of the worker
and the dependents in an individual case.
Action: Adopted (12).
(During discussion, the word “adult” before “member” in Bylaw
2.653 b 1 was deleted by common consent.)
To Address Ministry to and by the Aged
RESOLUTION 7-06
Overtures 7-33—7-38 (CW, pp. 362-63)
WHEREAS, With increased life span, the church can ex-
pect challenges not experienced by previous generations;
and
WHEREAS, Statistics suggest that the church is aging
faster than the general population with 40-50% of Sunday
church attendees over the age of 55; and
Wuereas, The elderly present unique opportunities to
serve the church and to be served by the church; therefore
be it
Resolved, That the Synod reaffirm its commitment to
this area of human need and ministry by the creation and
immediate implementation of a department on aging
within the Board for Social Ministry Services as recom-
mended by the board in its 1981 convention report (“The
Board of Social Ministry and World Relief believes that
our church must recognize the potential for increased min-
istry by and to older persons, and must create a depart-
ment within the board to give attention to this needed area
of work” (CW, p. 303); and be it further
Resolved, That the Board for Social Ministry Services
through its Chaplaincy Services and Task Force on Aging
explore the full potential of chaplaincy ministries among
the institutionalized frail elderly and develop a model and
standard for such ministry; and be it finally
Resolved, That the board offer modified versions of this
model for ministry in smaller institutions.
Action: Adopted (12).
To Affirm Investment Policies
RESOLUTION 7-07
Overtures 7-19, 7-21, 7-23 (CW, pp. 359-60)
Wuereas, Scripture urges all Christians to be con-
cerned about using their God-given resources to His glory;
and
Wuereas, The investment policy of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod includes limitations with regard
to companies which foster discrimination or who produce
tobacco or alcoholic products; and
WHEREAS, The investment policy of the synodical boards
with regard to U.S. firms operating in South Africa is to
invest funds only with those companies subscribing to the
Sullivan Principles; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
in convention affirm the present synodical investment pol-
icies in regard to discrimination and other moral issues
and commend the boards responsible for investing syn-
odical funds in a way that gives attention to Christian
ethics through their investment policies; and be it finally
Resolved, That all Christians be encouraged to review
their investment practices to provide a Christian witness
by the way in which they invest their funds.
Action: Adopted (13).
(In session 12 an amendment stating “WHEREAS, The Lu-
theran Church—Missouri Synod finds repugnant all nations that
promote racial or ethnic discrimination, state terrorism, or de-
tention for political reasons” was declined. When discussion re-
sumed in session 13 a motion was made to substitute the words
“that divest” for “subscribing to the Sullivan Principles” in the
third whereas. No action was taken when it was pointed out that
the whereas was a statement of fact and so could not be altered.
When an amendment was introduced stating “Resolved, That the
members of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod congrega-