Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Page 211

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Page 211

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Sheet 45 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Sheet 49 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Sheet 61 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Sheet 81 Sheet 82 Sheet 83 Sheet 84 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Sheet 87 Sheet 88 Sheet 89 Sheet 90 Sheet 91 Sheet 92 Sheet 93 Sheet 94 Sheet 95 Sheet 96 Sheet 97 Sheet 98 Sheet 99 Sheet 100 Sheet 101 Page 3 Sheet 103 Sheet 104 Sheet 105 Sheet 106 Sheet 107 Sheet 108 Sheet 109 Sheet 110 Sheet 111 Sheet 112 Sheet 113 Sheet 114 Sheet 115 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Sheet 118 Sheet 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HUMAN CARE 211

an adult member of his family, by the board of elders
or the church council of his congregation, or by the syn-
odical or District board which is his ecclesiastical em-
ployer.

3. The District commission shal! be authorized to use
the professional consultative services needed to estab-
lish the facts in the situation. Subject to prevailing legal
limitations regarding the necessary consent of a party
to comprehensive or special medical examinations, the
commission may secure a prognosis and recommend a
program of remedial or supportive care. The commission
may propose vocational redirection or guidance into a
more suitable work situation.

4. The District commission shall have the authority
to recommend to the District President specific courses
of action. The District President shall have authority to
place a disabled church worker temporarily on a c.r.m.
or leave of absence status.

5. The Board of Managers of Concordia Plans and
the Board of World Relief, respectively, may be asked
to offer assistance and support in the care of the worker
and the dependents in an individual case.

6. Reports on individual cases shall be made an-
nually to the synodical President, who shall also refer
cases of appeal from the decision of a District commis-
sion to the synodical Commission on Ministerial Health.

PROPOSED WORDING

a. The commission shall—

1. Develop health programs for professional church
workers;

2. Assist districts in establishing and maintaining
commissions on ministerial health;

3. Make available qualified persons and materials
for conducting seminars on ministering to conflict.

b. The district commission shall—

1. Be charged with the responsibility of receiving,
investigating, and considering petitions from or com-
plaints concerning the alleged disability of a profes-
sional church worker. These requests may be initiated
in writing by the worker, by a member of his family, by
the board of elders or the church council of his congre-
gation, or by the synodical or district board that is his
employer.

2. Be authorized to use the professional consultative
services needed to establish the facts in the situation.
Subject to prevailing legal limitations regarding the
necessary consent of a party to comprehensive or special
medical examinations, the commission may secure a
prognosis and recommend a program of remedial or sup-
portive care. The commission may propose vocational
redirection or guidance into a more suitable work sit-
uation.

3. Shall have the authority to recommend to the dis-
trict president specific courses of action. The district
president shall have authority to place a disabled
church worker temporarily on candidate status, grant
a leave of absence, or place the worker on restricted
status.

c. The Board of Managers of the Concordia Plans and
the Board of World Relief, respectively, may be asked
to offer assistance and support in the care of the worker
and the dependents in an individual case.

Action: Adopted (12).

(During discussion, the word “adult” before “member” in Bylaw
2.653 b 1 was deleted by common consent.)

To Address Ministry to and by the Aged
RESOLUTION 7-06
Overtures 7-33—7-38 (CW, pp. 362-63)

WHEREAS, With increased life span, the church can ex-
pect challenges not experienced by previous generations;
and

WHEREAS, Statistics suggest that the church is aging
faster than the general population with 40-50% of Sunday
church attendees over the age of 55; and

Wuereas, The elderly present unique opportunities to
serve the church and to be served by the church; therefore
be it

Resolved, That the Synod reaffirm its commitment to
this area of human need and ministry by the creation and
immediate implementation of a department on aging
within the Board for Social Ministry Services as recom-
mended by the board in its 1981 convention report (“The
Board of Social Ministry and World Relief believes that
our church must recognize the potential for increased min-
istry by and to older persons, and must create a depart-
ment within the board to give attention to this needed area
of work” (CW, p. 303); and be it further

Resolved, That the Board for Social Ministry Services
through its Chaplaincy Services and Task Force on Aging
explore the full potential of chaplaincy ministries among
the institutionalized frail elderly and develop a model and
standard for such ministry; and be it finally

Resolved, That the board offer modified versions of this
model for ministry in smaller institutions.

Action: Adopted (12).
To Affirm Investment Policies
RESOLUTION 7-07
Overtures 7-19, 7-21, 7-23 (CW, pp. 359-60)

Wuereas, Scripture urges all Christians to be con-
cerned about using their God-given resources to His glory;
and

Wuereas, The investment policy of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod includes limitations with regard
to companies which foster discrimination or who produce
tobacco or alcoholic products; and

WHEREAS, The investment policy of the synodical boards
with regard to U.S. firms operating in South Africa is to
invest funds only with those companies subscribing to the
Sullivan Principles; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
in convention affirm the present synodical investment pol-
icies in regard to discrimination and other moral issues
and commend the boards responsible for investing syn-
odical funds in a way that gives attention to Christian
ethics through their investment policies; and be it finally

Resolved, That all Christians be encouraged to review
their investment practices to provide a Christian witness
by the way in which they invest their funds.

Action: Adopted (13).

(In session 12 an amendment stating “WHEREAS, The Lu-
theran Church—Missouri Synod finds repugnant all nations that
promote racial or ethnic discrimination, state terrorism, or de-
tention for political reasons” was declined. When discussion re-
sumed in session 13 a motion was made to substitute the words
“that divest” for “subscribing to the Sullivan Principles” in the
third whereas. No action was taken when it was pointed out that
the whereas was a statement of fact and so could not be altered.
When an amendment was introduced stating “Resolved, That the
members of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod congrega-