Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Sheet 108
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Sheet 108
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Sheet 45
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Sheet 49
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Sheet 59
Page 58
Sheet 61
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Sheet 81
Sheet 82
Sheet 83
Sheet 84
Sheet 85
Sheet 86
Sheet 87
Sheet 88
Sheet 89
Sheet 90
Sheet 91
Sheet 92
Sheet 93
Sheet 94
Sheet 95
Sheet 96
Sheet 97
Sheet 98
Sheet 99
Sheet 100
Sheet 101
Page 3
Sheet 103
Sheet 104
Sheet 105
Sheet 106
Sheet 107
Sheet 108
Sheet 109
Sheet 110
Sheet 111
Sheet 112
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Sheet 115
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Sheet 118
Sheet 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
GREETINGS OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF THE ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHES 107
gelical Lutheran Church in America. The coming into
being of that church should not be taken as reason to lessen
relationships or decrease the evidence of partnership. The
opposite should be true. The ELCA will be a Lutheran
church solidly based on the Lutheran Confessions. Within
that church, as within its antecedent bodies and The Lu-
theran Church—Missouri Synod, will be divergent convic-
tions as the manifestations of those dearly held and highly
treasured Confessions are interpreted and affirmed.
Nevertheless, we are all Lutherans and, as such, we need
and must make joint witness of our commitment to Jesus
Christ, Lord of the church, in those arenas of church mis-
sion and ministry wherever we can do so without compro-
mising the integrity of our respective church bodies as
humanly self-governing entities though equally and sim-
ilarly expressions of the body of Christ.
As a leader of a synod of the Lutheran Church in Amer-
ica, | enjoyed the privilege of a number of common ventures
with the leaders and members of the districts that served
the geographical area I served. As president of the Lu-
theran Council, I have appreciated the opportunity to pe-
riodically meet with your President and other leaders to
review, plan, and implement a number of joint undertak-
ings. Each of our church bodies has contributed to the other
by such undertakings and these must continue—and I
would hope be increased—for the sake of Christendom.
Last month, my wife and I had opportunity to visit Ja-
pan and while there to meet with a number of church lead-
ers, both Japanese and missionary. That experience was
most informative to us and among other things made us
take greater note than we had in the past of news reports
and articles concerning the country of Japan and its people.
Thus, it was with much interest that I read a recent
article in the Wall Street Journal on the perceived minimal
results of missionary work in Japan.
In the context of “return on investment,” the results are
very meager in contrast to the experience of USA-based
church missionaries in other parts of the world and par-
ticularly the third world. For church body after church
body in Japan, there are, more often than not, years of
witness and service before there is a measurable response
to the Gospel message. I note this experience of the mis-
sionary enterprise in the Far East to remind you and me
alike that the “return on investment” of the Christian
church is not what it could or should be in our country.
Unhesitatingly we affirm we have a treasure to be
shared—our faith in Jesus Christ.
Each of our church bodies has that mandate. Each has
the responsibility to successfully fulfill it. Because we have
the same Christocentric foundation and a common Lu-
theran Confessional heritage, I ask you, should it not be
that we strengthen one another in our mission fulfillment
by common counsel, planning and activity whenever pos-
sible?
I call for increasing respect by each of our bodies for the
other as we acknowledge the integrity of each other’s com-
mitment to serve Jesus Christ as a part of His body. I yearn
for growing acceptance and understanding by each of our
church bodies for the other as from time to time we affirm
varying positions, even sometimes diametrically opposite
on issues that confront society. I plead for a growing re-
lationship among the members and leaders of each of our
church bodies for those of the other as we acknowledge
that we are one in the household of Christ’s faith and thus
kin of each other because of our common Confessional her-
itage and commitment. As I will note in my report on behalf
of the Lutheran Council in the USA, we have taken risks
together in days past without compromising the integrity
of our individual church bodies. Let us continue to do that
in the future. I believe that would be pleasing to God.
I pray God’s blessings and guidance to you as you de-
liberate in this convention and wish you successful faith-
fulness in your service to Him and for His people. Your
task is great. Our God is greater. Thank you, sisters and
brothers, for your witness and faithful responsiveness to
the commission given all His people by the Lord Jesus
Christ, our Savior.
Reuben T. Swanson, D.D.
4. Greetings of the Executive Secretary of the
Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches
Dr. Bohimann and delegates, this is perhaps the most dif-
ficult assignment that Bishop Herzfeld has ever assigned
to me. In a peculiar way this convention is an emotional
tie to me and my church, and you know what I mean. It
was not too many years ago we were part of it. And looking
at it from that perspective, when I was asked to take this
assignment and spoke with our Board of Directors, Bishop,
and others, we said “How do we say something to the LCMS
for the last time that we as a church will have that op-
portunity because God has blessed us and we are going to
be joining with ALC and LCA in the formation of a new
church?” Hopefully, by your next convention, it will be that
church bringing greetings. So what can we say? I decided
to use the approach that Dr. Bohlmann has used both times
that he has been willing to speak to our convention; that
approach, being blunt honesty, I think, to talk a little bit
about the pain, and then to ask for mutual forgiveness,
that we as churchgoers can move out together.
It is not easy for me to be here. We did not appreciate
the harsh judgment, again, by one of your institutions that
is training pastors for the future, against our church and
the other two churches that we are joining. We were very
pleased and gratified when Dr. Bohlmann assured us that
their judgment against us is not the judgment of this
church. We have been pained again by judgments of this
church about women in the church, which makes it im-
possible for this church to recognize those woman who are
pastors in our church. But we believe that under God’s