Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Sheet 89
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Sheet 89
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Sheet 45
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Sheet 49
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Sheet 59
Page 58
Sheet 61
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Sheet 81
Sheet 82
Sheet 83
Sheet 84
Sheet 85
Sheet 86
Sheet 87
Sheet 88
Sheet 89
Sheet 90
Sheet 91
Sheet 92
Sheet 93
Sheet 94
Sheet 95
Sheet 96
Sheet 97
Sheet 98
Sheet 99
Sheet 100
Sheet 101
Page 3
Sheet 103
Sheet 104
Sheet 105
Sheet 106
Sheet 107
Sheet 108
Sheet 109
Sheet 110
Sheet 111
Sheet 112
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Sheet 115
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Sheet 118
Sheet 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
on this score blunts the radical nature of the Gospel.
Second, there is the potential for confusing Law and
Gospel in the church’s life. It has been observed that “the
Gospel is the basic governing principle in every area of
faith and life” (Harry G. Coiner, The Lutheran Witness,
March 3, 1964, p. 10). Specifically, this means that cal-
culating, legalistic, and autocratic lording over the people
of God has no place in His church. “Legalism is not em-
ployment of the Law to the exclusion of the Gospel; it is
every effort to accomplish through the Law ... what only
the Gospel can accomplish.” Perhaps legalistic practice and
procedure has the appearance of greater courage and
quicker success than evangelical practice. But the “legal-
istic approach lacks true course; it does not allow God to
reign and His Word to work” (Coiner, p. 14). Certainly, all
use of the Law must not be rejected; but both Law and
Gospel must be employed in an evangelical way.
Third, Law and Gospel must not be confused in the
church’s witness. Appropriately understood and articu-
lated to others, the Gospel does not threaten and it has no
conditions. It is pure promise, undeserved yet certain.
Nevertheless, the “ifs” of Christians continue to multiply—
the “ifs” of a Gospel that is not a Gospel at all. If you feel
sorry, God will forgive you. If you modify your behavior,
you can be regarded as a true Christian. If you trust in
Jesus, your troubles will be over. If you have faith, God
will grant mercy. Those “ifs” and others like them threaten
the Gospel by rendering its promise dependent on some-
thing we do. In one of his homilies, Luther spoke about
those who, in his words, “talk a lot about faith but then
they mix things together .. . by saying if you live in such
and such a way God will be gracious to you, and they turn
the mercy seat into a judgment seat and the judgment seat
into a mercy seat.” The Law expresses itself in commands
and conditions; “Do this and you will live” (Luke 10:28
RSV). It places the burden of performance on us. The
Gospel expresses itself differently: Jesus died and rose
again the third day to give you new life. This promise takes
the burden from us and places it on Christ. In the domain
of the Gospel, no conditions apply. When we neglect this
truth and mingle God’s Word of Law and His Word of
Gospel in our personal witnessing, the result is that nei-
ther word is expressed clearly.
“No one is an orthodox teacher simply because he pre-
sents all the articles of faith according to Scripture,”
Walther asserted in one of his famous theses. “An orthodox
teacher must also properly distinguish the Law from the
Gospel.” Orthodoxy means correct doctrine and for all of
us there is one central doctrine, justification by faith for
Christ’s sake through the Gospel. If there is one task to
which this great teacher of the church calls us today it is
to proclaim the Gospel; to commit ourselves anew to the
challenge of maintaining that Scriptural tension between
God’s two messages so that He may meet men and women
at their need and deliver them from a world of despair,
failure, and death to a new world of life in Christ. This is
our calling and our obligation. It is also our privilege, our
joy, and our glory.
John F. Johnson, Th.D., Ph.D.