Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Page 131

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Page 131

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Sheet 45 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Sheet 49 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Sheet 61 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Sheet 81 Sheet 82 Sheet 83 Sheet 84 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Sheet 87 Sheet 88 Sheet 89 Sheet 90 Sheet 91 Sheet 92 Sheet 93 Sheet 94 Sheet 95 Sheet 96 Sheet 97 Sheet 98 Sheet 99 Sheet 100 Sheet 101 Page 3 Sheet 103 Sheet 104 Sheet 105 Sheet 106 Sheet 107 Sheet 108 Sheet 109 Sheet 110 Sheet 111 Sheet 112 Sheet 113 Sheet 114 Sheet 115 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Sheet 118 Sheet 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

CONGREGATIONAL MINISTRIES 131

in the image of God and deserving of honor (Rom.
1:24-25). Pornography has special appeal to those
who, for instance, desire not a woman, but only “a
pleasure for which a woman happens to be the nec-
essary piece of apparatus” (C.S. Lewis, The Four
Loves, p. 135). Such separation of bodily functions
from the body as person is foreign to the Scriptures.
One’s body is not merely the carrier of sex but the
carrier of “man’s very self” (J. A. T. Robinson, The
Body, p. 28; (cf. 1 Cor. 6:13-20, where “body” is used
by the apostle Paul in the sense of our word person-
ality; “body” is equivalent to the personal pronoun).
The manifestations of sexual deterioration, says Hel-
mut Thielicke, are caused by the “loss of the ability
to see the interconnection of bios and person,” and
thus the tendency to “degrade one’s partner to the
status of a mere function-bearer . . .” (Ethics of Sex,
p. 24).

4. Pornography accepts as “normal,” and urges, forms
of sexual perversion contrary to the norms of sexual
conduct which the Creator God has established for
His creatures. Homosexual behavior, for instance, is
regarded as a “natural” form of human sexual activ-
ity, a practice condemned by the Scriptures as “un-
natural” and as a manifestation of the refusal to
acknowledge and honor the Creator (Rom. 1:24—27).
Such sexual deviancy receives first mention among
the social evils which “rend the fabric of society and
make an agony of the common life that should in
God’s intent have been a blessing to mankind” (M.
Franzmann, Romans, p. 43).

5. Pornography, in its crasser forms, has resorted to
open derision of the standards of sexual conduct to
which Christians commit themselves, and even
mockery of the cross of Christ itself. Those who ad-
vocate the removal of pornography from the public
sphere on the basis of common humanitarian values
have also become the objects of slanderous and ob-
scene commentary. Such repudiation of the good is
reminiscent of the Biblical predictions of the abuse
to be expected in the last days when men shall be
“lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God” (2 Tim.
3:1-7).

6. Pornography and its habitual use poses a serious
threat to faith and the spiritual life (cf. Matt. 5:27-
30; Prov. 6:32). Pornography’s addictive character
threatens to produce the subservience to desires that
takes place in the life of one who permits sin to rule
(Rom. 6:12; cf. 1 Cor. 6:2).

In view of what the Scriptures say about sexual behav-
ior that honors both God and one’s neighbor, Christians
would do well to recognize the church’s important role in
providing instruction on questions of human sexuality.
They should be sensitized to the need for an effective wit-
ness to God’s will, also in the civil sphere where they may
choose to support efforts to curb the production and sale
of pornography (e.g., economic boycotts). Those responsible
for providing Christian instruction and counsel should be
equipped and urged to address the problem of pornography
by fostering positive, respectful attitudes toward the Cre-

ator’s good gift of human sexuality. Care must be exercised
to distinguish His intentions for the use of this aspect of
our creaturely existence from the distortions of it resultant
from the Fall. Christians should be especially sensitive to
the need for speaking the Gospel of forgiveness to those
overcome with guilt and in need of help to live responsible
Christian lives in the area of human sexuality. Only the
renewing power of the Holy Spirit who works through the
Word and Sacraments can change the heart “both to will
and to work for [God’s] good pleasure” (Phil. 2:13). The
church, therefore, ought to intensify its efforts to provide
materials and resources that will enable people to discover
the joys and blessings that come to individuals and families
when expressions of sexuality are in harmony with the
Creator’s design.

Action: Adopted as amended (12).

(Number 1 of the second resolve was added by common con-
sent.)

To Increase Percentage of Synodically
Trained Teachers in Lutheran Schools

RESOLUTION 2-09B
Overtures 2-47-49 (CW, p. 91)

Wuereas, The purpose of Lutheran schools and their
role in the congregations of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod is being jeopardized by the decreasing per-
centage of synodically trained teachers in Lutheran school
classrooms (90% in 1970 and 68% in 1985); and

WHEREAS, This situation has become a serious problem
and will be difficult to reverse unless immediate steps are
taken to mobilize the resources of the Synod to bring about
a reversal; therefore be it

Resolved, That all Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
schools, preschool through college, be encouraged to em-
ploy only called teachers who are certified by The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod and, if unable to do so, to en-
courage hiring only teachers who hold membership in Lu-
theran Church—Missouri Synod congregations; and be it
further

Resolved, That congregations of the Synod be encour-
aged to use the proposed salary schedules developed by the
Board for Parish Services, which contain salary differen-
tiations that reward workers for special theological train-
ing; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod express and demonstrate its
appreciation to non-synodically trained teachers who have
served faithfully in Lutheran schools by making serious,
creative efforts that provide non-synodically-trained
teachers access to theological training that leads to teacher
colloquy; and be it further

Resolved, That our synodical colleges be encouraged to
coordinate colloquy programs with graduate programs,
thereby providing further incentive to candidates consid-
ering pursuit of the colloquy program; and be it further

Resolved, That our synodical colleges be encouraged to
expand the offerings of extension courses in geographical
locations where large numbers of non-synodically trained