Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Sheet 111

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Sheet 111

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Sheet 45 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Sheet 49 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Sheet 61 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Sheet 81 Sheet 82 Sheet 83 Sheet 84 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Sheet 87 Sheet 88 Sheet 89 Sheet 90 Sheet 91 Sheet 92 Sheet 93 Sheet 94 Sheet 95 Sheet 96 Sheet 97 Sheet 98 Sheet 99 Sheet 100 Sheet 101 Page 3 Sheet 103 Sheet 104 Sheet 105 Sheet 106 Sheet 107 Sheet 108 Sheet 109 Sheet 110 Sheet 111 Sheet 112 Sheet 113 Sheet 114 Sheet 115 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Sheet 118 Sheet 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

110 OTHER PRESENTATIONS

eventually visit the Soviet Union or Estonia or Latvia or
Lithuania. I plead with everyone of you to take along a
Bible in English or German or I can provide one or more
for you in Latvian if you are going to Latvia. Bring another
good theological book for your own personal devotional life.
It is legal. You can bring them in. And there is no law that
prohibits you from going to church on Sunday and giving
that Bible and that book as a gift to the pastor there. He
will know what to do with it. With Concordia Publishers
I would like to plead, that by insured mail they would send
a copy of every significant theological work that they have
published to the Consistory in Riga for the seminary li-
brary there. While books sent by individuals never get
through, those mailed from institutions to institutions by
insured mail usually do get through. Most students there
do read English and I can give you the address where to

send them and if need be I can even provide the funds for
that.

Now, finally, when I first showed up at the Lutheran
Council in the United States, someone asked me who I was
“Oh!” he said, “so you are the fifth wheel.” I said, “Yes, of
course, the steering wheel.” If I were the steering wheel,
of course, that would make our mission about which I told
you much easier, I think. But, seriously, I wish that all
the churches in the West would let Christ be their Steering
Wheel instead of keeping Him as a Spare in the trunk.
Then the mission of the exiles would really be much easier.

I thank you for this opportunity to lay my burdens upon
you. And J pray that Christ would truly steer the work
and the life of The Lutheran—Church Missouri Synod.
Thank you.

Rev. Vilis Varsbergs

6. Greetings of the President of the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A.

President Bohlmann and members and fi iends of this del-
egation:

I want to begin by expressing a word of appreciation to
you and to your other colleagues from the Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod for your very significant and sub-
stantive contributions to the various policy-making and
decision-setting bodies of our Lutheran Council in the
U.S.A. The Lutheran Council—and you have heard much
about it and are keenly aware of its work—has been a very
noble and a worthy experiment. It is now in its 20th year
as it approaches the final year of cooperative service of
those of us in the Lutheran family in this country.

It has been my honor now for several years to serve as
President of the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A. Your own
secretary, Walter L. Rosin, serves as faithful secretary of
our council, and Bishop E. Harold Jansen of the Eastern
District of The American Lutheran Church serves as vice-
president. So I bring you greetings on behalf of those of-
ficers as well as on behalf of the 24 representatives from
the five Lutheran Church bodies who are partners; on be-
half of 153 employees in New York, Chicago, and Wash-
ington, and especially on behalf of Dr. John Houck, the
general secretary of our council.

During these last two decades there have been a num-
ber of important programs that have been implemented
by the council as its members have worked together: stud-
ies, dialogs, conversations, consultations, research, mis-
sion and ministry planning, work on campuses and with
military personnel, and a number of other events and ac-
tivities where we have found it possible and necessary for
Lutherans to work together. Now because of changes that
are taking place in the structure of Lutheranism in this
country, the Lutheran Council as a common and collective
agency of church-body partners will become history. But
as John Houck told us at the last annual meeting of the
council last May, “Its work will continue until those valid
and viable ministries which it is charged to fulfill are
turned over to the partner members.” We Lutherans are

very conscious and proud of the traditions that we have.
And I am convinced that the work of the council has been
vital and God pleasing. That is, it has been the product of
the best of the strands and the brands of Lutheranism.

Permit me now to just take a moment to cite two illus-
trations of the work that we do through our Lutheran
Council in the United States of America.

Most of us, I believe, who attended the last annual meet-
ing were impressed by the report that was given by what
we call the Department of Specialized Pastoral Care and
Clinical Pastoral Education. A Missouri Synod pastor,
Walter Baepler, is in charge of this work and oversees the
training programs and the Lutherans who are serving in
what we know as Clinical Pastoral Education. Walter Bae-
pler, with his associate, Chaplain Serge Castigliano, main-
tains contact with over 800 chaplains serving in agencies
and institutions in our country, of which 250 are pastors
of this Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. For two de-
cades Lutherans have worked with effectiveness and ef-
ficiency together to supervise and coordinate the important
work that is being done as the Gospel is offered in word
and deed in these various ministries.

The second instance in our work together that I cite is
through the Division of Mission and Ministry that faci-
liates the work of a number of the national and regional
efforts embracing the larger Lutheran community. One of
our current projects is related to our Lutheran commission
on ministry with disabled persons. This commission, given
staff service from the Lutheran Council, conducted an im-
portant survey in 1984 that gave us much-needed infor-
mation on how our congregations are involving disabled
persons in their ministry. We found that only about 10%
of the congregations of Lutheranism in this country have
something that is meaningful. But the survey revealed
that the disabled population within or near Lutheran con-
gregations offers a challenge for more effectively embrac-
ing those who are deaf or blind, mentally ill, or mentally
handicapped and those who have physical disabilities. Un-