Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Sheet 111
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Sheet 111
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Sheet 45
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Sheet 49
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Sheet 59
Page 58
Sheet 61
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Sheet 81
Sheet 82
Sheet 83
Sheet 84
Sheet 85
Sheet 86
Sheet 87
Sheet 88
Sheet 89
Sheet 90
Sheet 91
Sheet 92
Sheet 93
Sheet 94
Sheet 95
Sheet 96
Sheet 97
Sheet 98
Sheet 99
Sheet 100
Sheet 101
Page 3
Sheet 103
Sheet 104
Sheet 105
Sheet 106
Sheet 107
Sheet 108
Sheet 109
Sheet 110
Sheet 111
Sheet 112
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Sheet 115
Sheet 116
Sheet 117
Sheet 118
Sheet 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
110 OTHER PRESENTATIONS
eventually visit the Soviet Union or Estonia or Latvia or
Lithuania. I plead with everyone of you to take along a
Bible in English or German or I can provide one or more
for you in Latvian if you are going to Latvia. Bring another
good theological book for your own personal devotional life.
It is legal. You can bring them in. And there is no law that
prohibits you from going to church on Sunday and giving
that Bible and that book as a gift to the pastor there. He
will know what to do with it. With Concordia Publishers
I would like to plead, that by insured mail they would send
a copy of every significant theological work that they have
published to the Consistory in Riga for the seminary li-
brary there. While books sent by individuals never get
through, those mailed from institutions to institutions by
insured mail usually do get through. Most students there
do read English and I can give you the address where to
send them and if need be I can even provide the funds for
that.
Now, finally, when I first showed up at the Lutheran
Council in the United States, someone asked me who I was
“Oh!” he said, “so you are the fifth wheel.” I said, “Yes, of
course, the steering wheel.” If I were the steering wheel,
of course, that would make our mission about which I told
you much easier, I think. But, seriously, I wish that all
the churches in the West would let Christ be their Steering
Wheel instead of keeping Him as a Spare in the trunk.
Then the mission of the exiles would really be much easier.
I thank you for this opportunity to lay my burdens upon
you. And J pray that Christ would truly steer the work
and the life of The Lutheran—Church Missouri Synod.
Thank you.
Rev. Vilis Varsbergs
6. Greetings of the President of the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A.
President Bohlmann and members and fi iends of this del-
egation:
I want to begin by expressing a word of appreciation to
you and to your other colleagues from the Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod for your very significant and sub-
stantive contributions to the various policy-making and
decision-setting bodies of our Lutheran Council in the
U.S.A. The Lutheran Council—and you have heard much
about it and are keenly aware of its work—has been a very
noble and a worthy experiment. It is now in its 20th year
as it approaches the final year of cooperative service of
those of us in the Lutheran family in this country.
It has been my honor now for several years to serve as
President of the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A. Your own
secretary, Walter L. Rosin, serves as faithful secretary of
our council, and Bishop E. Harold Jansen of the Eastern
District of The American Lutheran Church serves as vice-
president. So I bring you greetings on behalf of those of-
ficers as well as on behalf of the 24 representatives from
the five Lutheran Church bodies who are partners; on be-
half of 153 employees in New York, Chicago, and Wash-
ington, and especially on behalf of Dr. John Houck, the
general secretary of our council.
During these last two decades there have been a num-
ber of important programs that have been implemented
by the council as its members have worked together: stud-
ies, dialogs, conversations, consultations, research, mis-
sion and ministry planning, work on campuses and with
military personnel, and a number of other events and ac-
tivities where we have found it possible and necessary for
Lutherans to work together. Now because of changes that
are taking place in the structure of Lutheranism in this
country, the Lutheran Council as a common and collective
agency of church-body partners will become history. But
as John Houck told us at the last annual meeting of the
council last May, “Its work will continue until those valid
and viable ministries which it is charged to fulfill are
turned over to the partner members.” We Lutherans are
very conscious and proud of the traditions that we have.
And I am convinced that the work of the council has been
vital and God pleasing. That is, it has been the product of
the best of the strands and the brands of Lutheranism.
Permit me now to just take a moment to cite two illus-
trations of the work that we do through our Lutheran
Council in the United States of America.
Most of us, I believe, who attended the last annual meet-
ing were impressed by the report that was given by what
we call the Department of Specialized Pastoral Care and
Clinical Pastoral Education. A Missouri Synod pastor,
Walter Baepler, is in charge of this work and oversees the
training programs and the Lutherans who are serving in
what we know as Clinical Pastoral Education. Walter Bae-
pler, with his associate, Chaplain Serge Castigliano, main-
tains contact with over 800 chaplains serving in agencies
and institutions in our country, of which 250 are pastors
of this Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. For two de-
cades Lutherans have worked with effectiveness and ef-
ficiency together to supervise and coordinate the important
work that is being done as the Gospel is offered in word
and deed in these various ministries.
The second instance in our work together that I cite is
through the Division of Mission and Ministry that faci-
liates the work of a number of the national and regional
efforts embracing the larger Lutheran community. One of
our current projects is related to our Lutheran commission
on ministry with disabled persons. This commission, given
staff service from the Lutheran Council, conducted an im-
portant survey in 1984 that gave us much-needed infor-
mation on how our congregations are involving disabled
persons in their ministry. We found that only about 10%
of the congregations of Lutheranism in this country have
something that is meaningful. But the survey revealed
that the disabled population within or near Lutheran con-
gregations offers a challenge for more effectively embrac-
ing those who are deaf or blind, mentally ill, or mentally
handicapped and those who have physical disabilities. Un-