Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1986 · 56th Convention › Page 130

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1986, Page 130

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Sheet 45 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Sheet 49 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Sheet 59 Page 58 Sheet 61 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Sheet 81 Sheet 82 Sheet 83 Sheet 84 Sheet 85 Sheet 86 Sheet 87 Sheet 88 Sheet 89 Sheet 90 Sheet 91 Sheet 92 Sheet 93 Sheet 94 Sheet 95 Sheet 96 Sheet 97 Sheet 98 Sheet 99 Sheet 100 Sheet 101 Page 3 Sheet 103 Sheet 104 Sheet 105 Sheet 106 Sheet 107 Sheet 108 Sheet 109 Sheet 110 Sheet 111 Sheet 112 Sheet 113 Sheet 114 Sheet 115 Sheet 116 Sheet 117 Sheet 118 Sheet 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

a

130 RESOLUTIONS

Wuereas, Parents find it difficult to shield themselves
and their children from exposure to the influence of such
destructive media; and

Wuenreas, Pastors, teachers, youth leaders, counselors,
social agencies, and law officials are seeing families broken
and lives adversely affected; and

Wuereas, Persons of all ages and both sexes are vic-
timized and exploited by pornography and obscenity; and

Wuereas, Silence is often interpreted as consent; and

Wuereas, The Lord tells us in Phil. 4:8 to fill our minds
with “those things that are good and deserve praise, things
that are true, noble, right, pure, lovely, and honorable”;
and

Wuereas, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is
committed to helping its congregations equip men, women,
youth, and children to resist the evils of pornography, viol-
ence, obscenity, and indecency and to continue to build up
one another in Christian love, mutual respect, and care for
personal health and the public welfare; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod intensify its efforts to en-
courage every congregational member to examine their
personal life-style and develop an awareness of the depth
of the problems resulting from pornography, violence, ob-
scenity, and indecency and the implications for the church
and the world; and be it further

Resolved, That members of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod congregations be urged to take an active, sup-
portive role in working to combat the effects of
pornographic, violent, obscene, and indecent material
through such means as

1. praying—to pray for those individuals engaged in
battling the pornographic establishments; to pray for
those individuals fighting the temptation of pornog-
raphy; to pray for the innocent victims, young boys
and girls, as well as women, to pray for those who
are consumed by pornographic passions and desires;
to pray for those who sell and distribute porno-
graphic material;

2. using selective listening, reading, and viewing prac-
tices;

3. withdrawing support of products and retailers in-
volved;

4. contacting sponsors and advertisers supporting in-
decent media, urging their practices to change;

5. contacting legislators and authorities;

and be it further

Resolved, That the Task Force on Christian Values,
Public Decency, and Morality be expanded to include dis-
trict and parish-level members to provide grassroots in-
volvement; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod through the Board for Parish
Services and the Board for Youth Services endorse and
make available for congregational study, the Statement on
Pornography which follows this resolution, educational
materials, and any other guides, relative and pertinent
information, and a list of resources available on the sub-
ject; and be it finally

Resolved, That members of congregations throughout

the Synod be urged to intensify their witness of the joys
and blessings that come to individuals and families when
life-styles and expressions of sexuality are in harmony
with the Creator’s design.

A Statement on Pornography

Webster’s New World Dictionary defines pornography
as “1. writings, pictures, etc. intended primarily to arouse
sexual desire. 2. the production of such writings, pictures,
etc.” Literally, “pornography” is the combination of two
Greek words that mean “writing about prostitutes.” The
verbal root of “porno” means “to sell,” “to harlot for hire.”

As such “pornography,” of course, is not mentioned in
the Scriptures; it is not included in the Biblical catalogs
of the works of the sinful flesh (though the term porneia,
which often heads the list in Paul’s writings, is inclusive
enough to embrace this form of sexual immorality; (cf. 1
Cor. 7:2, where the plural of porneia is used to point to
“the various factors that may bring about sexual immo-
rality,” Bauer, Arndt, Gingrich, and Danker, Greek-Eng-
lish Lexicon, p. 700). However, Christian moral judgments
regarding pornography and its use are indeed informed by
what the Scriptures say about human sexuality. We ask,
therefore, what judgments must be made concerning por-
nography by those committed to the Biblical revelation of
God’s will for man and woman as sexual beings? We offer
the following guiding statements for moral reflection on
the issue of pornography.

1. What takes place in the sphere of a person’s thought
and will—not just overt behavior—is subject to the
limitations of the divine will for human sexuality.
The “fornications” (porneiat) of which Jesus speaks
come from the heart, “the center of the inner life of
man” (Theological Dictionary of the New Testament,
vol. 3, p. 611). At the same time it is a Biblical truism
that people driven by “the lusts of their hearts” (not
merely sexual, of course) are prone “to the dishon-
oring of their bodies among themselves ...” (Rom.
1:24). Immoral behavior is preceded by immoral
thoughts and a perverted will, Pornography and its
use must be condemned not only for the sexual abuse
which may ensue, but also for the fantasies in which
those who read and view it indulge themselves.

2. Pornography seeks to arouse sexual desire that is
directed not toward the good of another within the
fellowship of the marital union, but toward self-grat-
ification—a mark of the unredeemed life (1 Thess.
4:5). Accordingly, pornographic literature depre-
cates, and even disdains, marital fidelity and the giv-
ing of oneself to another in a permanent commitment
of love as an unhealthy suppression of human po
tentiality and development. Those who respond to
its appeal for the satisfaction of sexual appetites
inevitably become subject to forces that threaten and
bring dishonor to the institution of marriage (Matt.
5:27-30).

3. Pornography abstracts and divorces bodily functions
from the personhood of the individuals portrayed, S0
that in animalistic fashion they are viewed as ve-
hicles for sexual self-indulgence, not persons created