Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 306

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 306

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524 Page 525 Page 526 Page 527 Page 528 Page 529 Page 530 Page 531 Page 532 Page 533 Page 534 Page 535 Page 536 Page 537 Page 538 Page 539 Page 540 Page 541 Page 542 Page 543 Page 544 Page 545 Page 546 Page 547 Page 548 Page 549 Page 550 Page 551 Page 552 Page 553 Page 554 Page 555 Page 556 Page 557 Page 558

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

306

II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

Ecumenical Discussions on Justification
– the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
Participant ’s Guide

Introduction

forgiveness of sin and become righteous before God
out of grace for Christ’s sake through faith when we
believe that Christ has suffered for us and that for his
sake our sin is forgiven and righteousness and eternal
life are given to us. For God will regard and reckon
this faith as righteousness in his sight, as St. Paul says
in Romans 3:[21-26] and 4:[5]. (AC IV)1

Have you ever attended a Roman Catholic funeral? How was
it similar to a Lutheran funeral? What was different? How did
the people and the priest talk about salvation? Did the topic
of justification (how we are righteous before God) come up?
The “Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification”
(JDDJ) in 1999: A breakthrough between Lutherans and
Catholics?

2. The Ecumenical Movement

4. Trent: Rome’s Answer to the
Reformation
The Council of Trent (1545–1563)

The witness of a divided Christianity on the mission field.

Art illustration provided by Concordia Historical Institute, concordiahistoricalinstitute.org.
Used with permission.

If anyone says that men are justified either by the
imputation of Christ’s justice alone or by the remission of sins alone, excluding grace and charity that
is poured into their hearts by the Holy Spirit and
inheres in them, or also that the grace that justifies
us is only the favor of God, let him be anathema.3

23. When Lutherans emphasize that the righteousness of
Christ is our righteousness, their intention is above all
to insist that the sinner is granted righteousness before
God in Christ through the declaration of forgiveness
and that only in union with Christ is one’s life renewed.
When they stress that God’s grace is forgiving love (“the
favor of God”), they do not thereby deny the renewal
of the Christian’s life. They intend rather to express that
justification remains free from human cooperation and
is not dependent on the life-renewing effects of grace in
human beings.

How does this compare to the Lutheran view of the
righteousness of the Christian in justification?

5. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine
of Justification

Have you ever had a conversation where somebody said
something like: “If I do what I can, then God will be
gracious to me and I will be saved”? How is this similar to
the view that Luther was taught in his day?

24. When Catholics emphasize the renewal of the
interior person through the reception of grace imparted
as a gift to the believer, they wish to insist that God’s
forgiving grace always brings with it a gift of new life,
which in the Holy Spirit becomes effective in active
love. They do not thereby deny that God’s gift of
grace in justification remains independent of human
cooperation.4

Sometimes people think that all this talk about justification
is abstract and has nothing to do with their lives. How
would you answer?

What does this section of JDDJ say about the controversy
concerning whether justification is the forgiveness of sins
alone or also the inner transformation of the Christian?

The lines between Lutherans and Roman Catholics had
been drawn quite clearly for centuries. Could there ever
be unity? Years of dialogue seemed to promise that a basic
agreement in the central points was possible, even though
there might be differences in how the central points are
expressed. This was the method of JDDJ.

Did the Roman Catholics (in this section of JDDJ) change
their view that justification is not the remission of sins alone
or the imputation of Christ’s righteousness, as it was defined
in Trent?

From your experience, are these issues still relevant? Have
you had conversations with Roman Catholics on the topic
of justification?

Although change has taken place in the Roman
Catholic church since Vatican II, JDDJ shows how
very little headway has been made toward a genuine
resolution of the difference between Lutherans and
Roman Catholics on Justification. This statement is
not a ‘breakthrough.5

Is justification the forgiveness of sins or is it making an
individual righteous? Here is an excerpt from JDDJ. This is
rather complex, so one needs to read it slowly and carefully:

Ignatius Press, 2012), Decree on Justification, can. 9. DH 1559.
3

Decree on Justification, can. 11, DH 1561.

2 | Ecumenical Discussions on Justification

2019 Convention Workbook

First, let’s review the Roman Catholic position at the time of
the Reformation.

Read Galatians 2:14–21. How does this text address the
question of whether one is justified by faith alone?

3. The Reformation Background

This work may be reproduced by churches and schools for their own use in the study
of the Scriptures. Commercial reproduction, or reproduction for sale, of any portion
of this work or of the work as a whole, without the written permission of the copyright
holder, is prohibited.

22. We confess together that God forgives sin by grace
and at the same time frees human beings from sin’s
enslaving power and imparts the gift of new life in
Christ. When persons come by faith to share in Christ,
God no longer imputes to them their sin and through
the Holy Spirit effects in them an active love. These two
aspects of God’s gracious action are not to be separated,
for persons are by faith united with Christ, who in his
person is our righteousness (1 Corinthians 1:30): both
the forgiveness of sin and the saving presence of God
himself. Because Catholics and Lutherans confess this
together, it is true to say that:

Discussion Question: How was the doctrine of justification
controversial in the time of the Reformation?

If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith
alone in the sense that nothing else is required by
way of cooperation in order to obtain the grace
of justification and that it is not at all necessary
that he should be prepared and disposed by the
movement of his will, let him be anathema.2

Lutheran-Roman Catholic conversations.

© 2018 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
1333 S. Kirkwood Road
St. Louis, MO 63122
888-THE LCMS • lcms.org/ctcr

Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church, The Joint Declaration
RQ -XVWL¿FDWLRQ (1999): Section 4.2, 22–24, http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/
SRQWL¿FDOBFRXQFLOVFKUVWXQLGRFXPHQWVUFBSFBFKUVWXQLBGRFBBFDWKOXWK
MRLQWGHFODUDWLRQBHQKWPO.
4

5
7KH-RLQW'HFODUDWLRQRQWKH'RFWULQHRI-XVWL¿FDWLRQLQ&RQIHVVLRQDO/XWKHUDQ
Perspective (St. Louis: The Lutheran Church��issouri Synod, 1999), 10. It
should be noted that not even all Roman Catholic scholars and theologians would
characterize JDDJ as a “break-through” — or as a break with traditional and
official Roman Catholic doctrine. Some would agree with the basic assessment of
Leonardo De Chirico that the new description of justification in JDDJ “does not
give the impression of changing the theology of the Council of Trent (1545–1563),
according to which grace is sacramental and seen inside of a synergistic dynamic
of the process of salvation. This understanding of grace appears to be more in line
with the Catholic heritage of the Council of Trent, in an updated form, than with the
classic Protestant theology. In this sense, JDDJ is a clear exercise in an increased
catholicity (i.e. the ability to absorb ideas without changing the core) on the part
of Rome, which has not become more evangelical in the biblical sense.” (“Is the
Roman Catholic Church Now Committed to ‘Grace Alone’? at http://vaticanfiles.
org/en/2017/08/140-is-the-roman-catholic-church-now-committed-to-grace-

The Lutheran teaching was summarized in the Augsburg
Confession, presented in 1530:
Furthermore, it is taught that we cannot obtain
forgiveness of sin and righteousness before God through
our merit, work, or satisfactions, but that we receive

All quotations of the Book of Concord are from Robert Kolb and Timothy
J. Wengert, eds., The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical
Lutheran Church (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000).

1

Heinrich Denzinger, &RPSHQGLXPRI&UHHGV'H¿QLWLRQVDQG'HFODUDWLRQV
on Matters of Faith and Morals, ed. Peter Hünermann, 43rd ed. (San Francisco:

2

Participant’s Guide |

1

Participant’s Guide |

3

6. Conclusion

Divisions among Christians are sad, but unity without truth
is even worse. Instead of papering over differences, Christians
are to be honest about what separates them. As Lutherans,
we rejoice in the Gospel: the free forgiveness we receive on
account of Christ alone, through faith alone, by grace alone. It
is a source of continual sadness that large parts of Christianity
have rejected this joyous and freeing message. Therefore,
continued conversations with Roman Catholics, be it on an
individual level or in ecumenical dialogues, are important.
Our prayer as we engage in this task is that the Holy Spirit,
the Spirit of truth, will create unity in His Word.
GLOSSARY OF IMPORTANT TERMS
Grace – Lutheran: Though grace can mean gift, in the context of justification, grace is the unmerited favor of God. “It
is that merciful, affectionate disposition or goodwill of God
toward people according to which He forgives sins to those
who deserve eternal death. It is the unmerited love of God
toward all people (John 3:16; Titus 3:4–5). All consideration for
the merit of people must be excluded from this concept of
grace. God’s grace is not in the least affected, motivated, or
influenced by any worthiness in us.”6
Grace – Roman Catholic: Grace can mean several things. It
can mean that an individual looks with favor on another
person, or that someone because of that receives a gift
(“party favor”). In regard to God, God’s grace means that
He looks at man favorably and then does something that
changes man. God’s grace is therefore a gift that changes us.
The initial grace that makes a person a Christian cannot be
merited, but after that a Christian can merit more grace by
doing good works.
Justification – Lutheran: Justification is the conferring of
Christ’s perfect righteousness on Christians so that they are
righteous before God and do not lack anything. This righteousness does not need to be complemented by anything to
be saved.
Justification – Roman Catholic: Justification is the beginning of the Christian life. God makes people righteous, that
is, He forgives them their sins and transforms them internally so that they can do His will. Justification is not the
same as salvation.
alone/. See also “Ecumenical Impasse” in the Letters section of the January 2018
issue of First Things (pp. 4–5). KWWSVZZZ¿UVWWKLQJVFRPDUWLFOHOHWWHUV.
Edward W. A. Koehler, A Summary of Christian Doctrine, 3rd ed. (St. Louis:
Concordia Publishing House, 2006), 130.

6