Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 306
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 306
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Page 528
Page 529
Page 530
Page 531
Page 532
Page 533
Page 534
Page 535
Page 536
Page 537
Page 538
Page 539
Page 540
Page 541
Page 542
Page 543
Page 544
Page 545
Page 546
Page 547
Page 548
Page 549
Page 550
Page 551
Page 552
Page 553
Page 554
Page 555
Page 556
Page 557
Page 558
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
306
II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Ecumenical Discussions on Justification
– the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
Participant ’s Guide
Introduction
forgiveness of sin and become righteous before God
out of grace for Christ’s sake through faith when we
believe that Christ has suffered for us and that for his
sake our sin is forgiven and righteousness and eternal
life are given to us. For God will regard and reckon
this faith as righteousness in his sight, as St. Paul says
in Romans 3:[21-26] and 4:[5]. (AC IV)1
Have you ever attended a Roman Catholic funeral? How was
it similar to a Lutheran funeral? What was different? How did
the people and the priest talk about salvation? Did the topic
of justification (how we are righteous before God) come up?
The “Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification”
(JDDJ) in 1999: A breakthrough between Lutherans and
Catholics?
2. The Ecumenical Movement
4. Trent: Rome’s Answer to the
Reformation
The Council of Trent (1545–1563)
The witness of a divided Christianity on the mission field.
Art illustration provided by Concordia Historical Institute, concordiahistoricalinstitute.org.
Used with permission.
If anyone says that men are justified either by the
imputation of Christ’s justice alone or by the remission of sins alone, excluding grace and charity that
is poured into their hearts by the Holy Spirit and
inheres in them, or also that the grace that justifies
us is only the favor of God, let him be anathema.3
23. When Lutherans emphasize that the righteousness of
Christ is our righteousness, their intention is above all
to insist that the sinner is granted righteousness before
God in Christ through the declaration of forgiveness
and that only in union with Christ is one’s life renewed.
When they stress that God’s grace is forgiving love (“the
favor of God”), they do not thereby deny the renewal
of the Christian’s life. They intend rather to express that
justification remains free from human cooperation and
is not dependent on the life-renewing effects of grace in
human beings.
How does this compare to the Lutheran view of the
righteousness of the Christian in justification?
5. The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine
of Justification
Have you ever had a conversation where somebody said
something like: “If I do what I can, then God will be
gracious to me and I will be saved”? How is this similar to
the view that Luther was taught in his day?
24. When Catholics emphasize the renewal of the
interior person through the reception of grace imparted
as a gift to the believer, they wish to insist that God’s
forgiving grace always brings with it a gift of new life,
which in the Holy Spirit becomes effective in active
love. They do not thereby deny that God’s gift of
grace in justification remains independent of human
cooperation.4
Sometimes people think that all this talk about justification
is abstract and has nothing to do with their lives. How
would you answer?
What does this section of JDDJ say about the controversy
concerning whether justification is the forgiveness of sins
alone or also the inner transformation of the Christian?
The lines between Lutherans and Roman Catholics had
been drawn quite clearly for centuries. Could there ever
be unity? Years of dialogue seemed to promise that a basic
agreement in the central points was possible, even though
there might be differences in how the central points are
expressed. This was the method of JDDJ.
Did the Roman Catholics (in this section of JDDJ) change
their view that justification is not the remission of sins alone
or the imputation of Christ’s righteousness, as it was defined
in Trent?
From your experience, are these issues still relevant? Have
you had conversations with Roman Catholics on the topic
of justification?
Although change has taken place in the Roman
Catholic church since Vatican II, JDDJ shows how
very little headway has been made toward a genuine
resolution of the difference between Lutherans and
Roman Catholics on Justification. This statement is
not a ‘breakthrough.5
Is justification the forgiveness of sins or is it making an
individual righteous? Here is an excerpt from JDDJ. This is
rather complex, so one needs to read it slowly and carefully:
Ignatius Press, 2012), Decree on Justification, can. 9. DH 1559.
3
Decree on Justification, can. 11, DH 1561.
2 | Ecumenical Discussions on Justification
2019 Convention Workbook
First, let’s review the Roman Catholic position at the time of
the Reformation.
Read Galatians 2:14–21. How does this text address the
question of whether one is justified by faith alone?
3. The Reformation Background
This work may be reproduced by churches and schools for their own use in the study
of the Scriptures. Commercial reproduction, or reproduction for sale, of any portion
of this work or of the work as a whole, without the written permission of the copyright
holder, is prohibited.
22. We confess together that God forgives sin by grace
and at the same time frees human beings from sin’s
enslaving power and imparts the gift of new life in
Christ. When persons come by faith to share in Christ,
God no longer imputes to them their sin and through
the Holy Spirit effects in them an active love. These two
aspects of God’s gracious action are not to be separated,
for persons are by faith united with Christ, who in his
person is our righteousness (1 Corinthians 1:30): both
the forgiveness of sin and the saving presence of God
himself. Because Catholics and Lutherans confess this
together, it is true to say that:
Discussion Question: How was the doctrine of justification
controversial in the time of the Reformation?
If anyone says that the sinner is justified by faith
alone in the sense that nothing else is required by
way of cooperation in order to obtain the grace
of justification and that it is not at all necessary
that he should be prepared and disposed by the
movement of his will, let him be anathema.2
Lutheran-Roman Catholic conversations.
© 2018 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
1333 S. Kirkwood Road
St. Louis, MO 63122
888-THE LCMS • lcms.org/ctcr
Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church, The Joint Declaration
RQ -XVWL¿FDWLRQ (1999): Section 4.2, 22–24, http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/
SRQWL¿FDOBFRXQFLOVFKUVWXQLGRFXPHQWVUFBSFBFKUVWXQLBGRFBBFDWKOXWK
MRLQWGHFODUDWLRQBHQKWPO.
4
5
7KH-RLQW'HFODUDWLRQRQWKH'RFWULQHRI-XVWL¿FDWLRQLQ&RQIHVVLRQDO/XWKHUDQ
Perspective (St. Louis: The Lutheran Church��issouri Synod, 1999), 10. It
should be noted that not even all Roman Catholic scholars and theologians would
characterize JDDJ as a “break-through” — or as a break with traditional and
official Roman Catholic doctrine. Some would agree with the basic assessment of
Leonardo De Chirico that the new description of justification in JDDJ “does not
give the impression of changing the theology of the Council of Trent (1545–1563),
according to which grace is sacramental and seen inside of a synergistic dynamic
of the process of salvation. This understanding of grace appears to be more in line
with the Catholic heritage of the Council of Trent, in an updated form, than with the
classic Protestant theology. In this sense, JDDJ is a clear exercise in an increased
catholicity (i.e. the ability to absorb ideas without changing the core) on the part
of Rome, which has not become more evangelical in the biblical sense.” (“Is the
Roman Catholic Church Now Committed to ‘Grace Alone’? at http://vaticanfiles.
org/en/2017/08/140-is-the-roman-catholic-church-now-committed-to-grace-
The Lutheran teaching was summarized in the Augsburg
Confession, presented in 1530:
Furthermore, it is taught that we cannot obtain
forgiveness of sin and righteousness before God through
our merit, work, or satisfactions, but that we receive
All quotations of the Book of Concord are from Robert Kolb and Timothy
J. Wengert, eds., The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical
Lutheran Church (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000).
1
Heinrich Denzinger, &RPSHQGLXPRI&UHHGV'H¿QLWLRQVDQG'HFODUDWLRQV
on Matters of Faith and Morals, ed. Peter Hünermann, 43rd ed. (San Francisco:
2
Participant’s Guide |
1
Participant’s Guide |
3
6. Conclusion
Divisions among Christians are sad, but unity without truth
is even worse. Instead of papering over differences, Christians
are to be honest about what separates them. As Lutherans,
we rejoice in the Gospel: the free forgiveness we receive on
account of Christ alone, through faith alone, by grace alone. It
is a source of continual sadness that large parts of Christianity
have rejected this joyous and freeing message. Therefore,
continued conversations with Roman Catholics, be it on an
individual level or in ecumenical dialogues, are important.
Our prayer as we engage in this task is that the Holy Spirit,
the Spirit of truth, will create unity in His Word.
GLOSSARY OF IMPORTANT TERMS
Grace – Lutheran: Though grace can mean gift, in the context of justification, grace is the unmerited favor of God. “It
is that merciful, affectionate disposition or goodwill of God
toward people according to which He forgives sins to those
who deserve eternal death. It is the unmerited love of God
toward all people (John 3:16; Titus 3:4–5). All consideration for
the merit of people must be excluded from this concept of
grace. God’s grace is not in the least affected, motivated, or
influenced by any worthiness in us.”6
Grace – Roman Catholic: Grace can mean several things. It
can mean that an individual looks with favor on another
person, or that someone because of that receives a gift
(“party favor”). In regard to God, God’s grace means that
He looks at man favorably and then does something that
changes man. God’s grace is therefore a gift that changes us.
The initial grace that makes a person a Christian cannot be
merited, but after that a Christian can merit more grace by
doing good works.
Justification – Lutheran: Justification is the conferring of
Christ’s perfect righteousness on Christians so that they are
righteous before God and do not lack anything. This righteousness does not need to be complemented by anything to
be saved.
Justification – Roman Catholic: Justification is the beginning of the Christian life. God makes people righteous, that
is, He forgives them their sins and transforms them internally so that they can do His will. Justification is not the
same as salvation.
alone/. See also “Ecumenical Impasse” in the Letters section of the January 2018
issue of First Things (pp. 4–5). KWWSVZZZ¿UVWWKLQJVFRPDUWLFOHOHWWHUV.
Edward W. A. Koehler, A Summary of Christian Doctrine, 3rd ed. (St. Louis:
Concordia Publishing House, 2006), 130.
6