Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 229
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 229
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Page 528
Page 529
Page 530
Page 531
Page 532
Page 533
Page 534
Page 535
Page 536
Page 537
Page 538
Page 539
Page 540
Page 541
Page 542
Page 543
Page 544
Page 545
Page 546
Page 547
Page 548
Page 549
Page 550
Page 551
Page 552
Page 553
Page 554
Page 555
Page 556
Page 557
Page 558
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
and prayer of the Commission that this study will be a
useful tool for individuals and congregations toward the
goal of reaffirming the royal priesthood of all Christians and be an encouragement for every Christian to
proclaim “the excellencies of him who called [us] out of
darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Peter 2:9b) according to one’s callings.
This study document seeks to highlight the special
identity of Christians, for, very simply, the royal priesthood is the Christian Church. Scripture unfolds in various ways the new identity of those whom God has made
His own in Baptism.7 The Holy Spirit’s work of regeneration is rich and expansive, beyond simple formulas, for it
is a whole new thing, a work of new creation (2 Cor. 5:17;
Gal. 6:15). He is re-creating by His grace those whom He
has created and put into this world in a variety of roles to
accomplish His purposes and to show forth and speak of
that saving love in Christ. In short, the goal is to remind
us of who we are and in whom we live and move and
have our being (Acts 17:28), and what that then means as
we go about our new life in Christ. Toward that goal, the
language of priesthood is particularly rich and worthy of
our study.
The doctrine of the royal priesthood and the priestly
vocation of “ordinary Christians” arises from Lutheran
Reformation theology with such force that some may
think these ideas began with Martin Luther and the other Reformers. The emphasis certainly becomes large in
Luther’s time, virtually exploding in his thought and on
the scene, but only because he encountered and engaged
a misplaced emphasis on other aspects of church, priest
and priesthood. The Reformation was not innovating but
rather reviving ideas as old as God’s first call to sinners.
While most at the dawn of the Reformation associated
“priest” and “priesthood” with the Old Testament tribe
of Levi or with ordained clergy in the New Testament
church, the Reformation recognized and then emphasized that in both the Old and New Testament Scriptures
“priest” really applied to all who are made new by the
promises of God in the Messiah promised and in the
Messiah who has come.
“Royal priesthood” is one title among many for the one, holy, catholic,
and apostolic — the Christian — Church. Other titles include “disciples” (Matt. 28:19); “flock of Christ” (Luke 12:32); “body of Christ” (1
Cor. 12); “saints” (Eph. 1:1); “God’s household” (Eph. 2:19); “people of
God” (Heb. 4:9); “holy nation” or “holy priesthood” (1 Peter 2:4–10);
“kingdom of God” (Rev. 5:10); “bride of Christ” (Rev. 21:9).
7
THE ROYAL PRIESTHOOD
|
In the first place, we are reminded here that Adam
and Eve, as pious parents, preached often and much
to their children about the will and worship of God,
inasmuch as both bring an offering to God.11
Then Luther draws a direct connection to the
priesthood:
But in connection with this passage let the reader
ponder the following, above all: Adam and Eve are
not only parents, nor do they merely provide for
their children and educate them for this present
life; but they also perform the office of priests.
Inasmuch as they are filled with the Holy Spirit
and are enlightened by the knowledge of Christ,
who is to come, they set before their children this
very hope of a future deliverance and exhort them
to show their gratitude to so merciful a God. It
is evident that the sacrifices which were handed
down had no other purpose.12
Abel’s sacrifice and, later, Noah’s were priestly thank
offerings (Gen. 4:4 and 8:20).13 The promise to Abram
included the assurance that the blessing of God would
be mediated to all nations through him and his family.
Abraham himself offered a priestly sacrifice in the lamb
provided by Yahweh Himself, thereby redeeming Isaac
(Gen. 22) and, through Him, preserving the messianic line whose Seed would redeem the world (see Gal.
3:16). Throughout the Genesis story, the people of God
11
Lectures on Genesis: Chapters 1–5, AE 1:246
12
Lectures on Genesis: Chapters 1–5, AE 1:247 (emphasis added).
13
Luther compares Abel and Cain as priests, noting that, outwardly,
Cain’s sacrifice might be more impressive: “But the verdict of the Epistle to the Hebrews is different; it declares that because of his faith Abel
brought the more excellent offering (Heb. 11:4). So the fault lay not in
the materials which were offered but in the person of him who brought
the offering. The faith of the individual was the weight which added
value to Abel’s offering, but Cain spoiled his offering. Abel believes that
God is good and merciful. For this reason his sacrifice is pleasing to
God. Cain, on the contrary, puts his trust in the prestige of his primogeniture; but he despises his brother as an insignificant and worthless
being. What, then, is God’s decision? He gives to the first-born the position of one born later, and to the one born later He gives the position
of the first-born. He looks toward Abel’s offering and shows that the
sacrifice of this priest pleases Him, but that Cain does not please Him
and is not a true priest” (Lectures on Genesis: Chapters 1–5, AE 1:251).
|
8
“Public” in the term “Office of the Public Ministry” is used in a particular manner. While the adjective “public” most commonly implies a
setting open to all, in other references the term public (Latin: publice)
implies action “for the community as a whole” (see Random House
Unabridged Dictionary, 2018, at https://www.dictionary.com/browse/
public?s=t, 2nd definition). It is in this sense that we speak of public
ministry. One in the Office of the Public Ministry acts on behalf of and
with the consent of the whole.
9
The LCMS has addressed the matter of the Office of the Public Ministry on numerous occasions, most notably by adopting Walther’s theses
on Church and the Office of the Ministry [Office] (in 1851 and again
in 2001). See The Church and the Office of the Ministry: Kirche und
Amt; The Voice of Our Church on the Question of Church and Office (St.
Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2012). In addition, we note several
CTCR reports pertaining to ministry: The Ministry in Its Relation to the
Christian Church (1973); The Ministry: Offices, Procedures, and Nomenclature (1981); Theology and Practice of the Divine Call (2003).
INTRODUCTION
Given this threefold mediatorial work — sacrifice,
prayer and proclamation — we can see the priesthood
at work already long before Sinai, before the declaration
of Israel’s royal priesthood and before the establishment
of the Levitical priesthood with its many responsibilities
for Israel’s worship. Luther sees this clearly, remarking
on Genesis 4:3, where the first sacrifice of Scripture
is mentioned:
THE ROYAL PRIESTHOOD
Before proceeding with our study, we want to prevent
a potential misunderstanding of this document. An
emphasis on the royal priesthood and the work of the
baptized proclaiming the excellencies of God may lead
some to assume that there is no need for the ministry
(for the office of publicly preaching the Gospel and
administering the sacraments on behalf of the church).
If there is no precise equivalent of a Levitical priesthood
in the New Testament Church, as we will show, is there
any Office of Public Ministry? Is such a thing necessary
when there is a vibrant priesthood of all the baptized?
There should be no doubt about the affirmative answers
to these questions. Yes, the New Testament not only
speaks of the calling of all believers to share the Gospel,
but it also speaks emphatically and frequently of the
divine institution and necessity of a particular, designated office. All teach in their own way, but not all are — or
should be — teachers or preachers or pastors or bishops
for the “public” proclamation and administration of
the Gospel on behalf of the Church or its congregations
(Eph. 4:11; James 3:1; 1 Cor. 12:29).8 Our Synod has emphatically articulated the proper understanding of the Office
of Public Ministry and nothing that we say herein should
be assumed to be in opposition to that doctrine. The royal priesthood and the Office of Public Ministry are not in
conflict with one another.9
3
engaged in the priestly work of prayer and proclamation
as they, on the one hand, responded in prayer and intercession to the Lord God who had called them to Himself
(e.g., Gen. 18:16–33; 20:17; 21:14–21; 24:42–45; 25:21; 32:9–12)
and, on the other hand, passed along His promises and
expectations to future generations (see especially Gen.
24:6–8; also Jacob’s blessing of his sons in Gen. 49).
Thus, although God applied the particular title
“priests” to His people in Exodus 19 (the formal Levitical
priesthood would be established several chapters later for
specific work), His kingdom of priests had been carrying
on priestly work as long as God had been working both
with and for sinners, that is, as long as God had been
working to redeem people and to show to others His
gracious will. Although the term “priest” is not used, the
role and work are still there. In all of this, the priestly
work is not meritorious — as if the patriarchal family
earned its status by its own inherent holiness. No, the
frank record of the patriarchal narratives reveals these
men and their families as sinners. Rather than a record
of moral super-humans, Scripture reveals the Lord at
work, graciously providing and calling.
God’s calling all Israel His priests in Exodus 19, then,
is also making plain that this status as His special people
came not on their account, but because He had set them
apart. He had brought all Israel literally out of slavery
and to Himself. He had freed them, not just from Egypt
but also from themselves and their sin. They were freed
to live in sacrificial service, worship, and witness to
Him.14 There was no priesthood — and no life — apart
from God. All they were and would do was in response
— not “to become His people,” but “because they were
His people.”
Key to this response was not simply public worship
and thankful praise. Praise stemmed from the whole of
the lives of the people of Israel as holy priests, set apart
from the surrounding nations (Ex. 19:5). They would also
stand apart, not only as a “great nation” (Gen. 12:2), but
also as a “holy nation” (Ex. 19:6).
While we focus on Israel as God’s special people
therefore, it would be a mistake to think that God’s
promises existed only for Israel. Although the people of
Israel had been singled out and brought out of Egypt, the
promises of salvation stretched beyond Israel, and were
I. THE OLD TESTAMENT BACKGROUND
“You yourselves have seen … how I bore you on eagles’ wings and brought you to myself. Now therefore, if you
will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for
all the earth is mine; and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” Exodus 19:4–6
W
hen they hear the word
“priest,” most people will probably
think of the minister of a Roman Catholic, or maybe Episcopal, church. And,
if we grew up in Sunday school, the combination of “Old
Testament” and “priest” may conjure up the image from
one of our lessons of a stately, bearded figure in exotic
garb — a priest from the tribe of Levi. Perhaps the priest
is standing at an altar, sacrificing a lamb or other offering, and in the background either a tabernacle or temple
may be depicted. Such images fit with the definitions of
priest that one finds in a standard dictionary. The basic
understanding of priest one will find there is “a minister
of any religion.”
Peter’s reference to God’s sons and daughters as “a
royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9) rests on a rich background
with deep roots in God’s dealing with His Old Testament people. But it is not the background we have just
sketched — those individual priests who lead worship.
As Israel came to Sinai, before the Lord gave His Law or
established the Levitical priesthood with all its responsibilities for leading Israel’s worship, He charged Moses:
Thus you shall say to the house of Jacob, and tell the
people of Israel: “You yourselves have seen what I
did to the Egyptians and how I bore you on eagles’
wings and brought you to myself. Now therefore, if
you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among
all peoples, for all the earth is mine; and you shall
be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.”
(Ex. 19:3–6, emphasis added)
THE ROYAL PRIESTHOOD
|
I. THE OLD TESTAMENT BACKGROUND
5
offered to all who would take God at His Word.15 As His
priests, Israel itself would serve as a mediator: a beacon
and lamp to all the nations. Isaiah 61:5–6 says as much.
“Strangers shall stand and tend your flocks; foreigners
shall be your plowmen and vinedressers; but you shall
be called the priests of the Lord; they shall speak of you
as the ministers of our God” (emphasis added). Psalm
145:10–12 also attests to such a role filled by all the faithful of Israel:
All you have made will thank you, Lord;
The faithful will bless you.
They will speak of the glory of your kingdom
and will declare your might,
informing all people of your mighty acts
and of the glorious splendor of your kingdom.
(CSB)
All of this is necessary for an accurate consideration
of priesthood in the Old Testament and for the recognition that priestly work exists apart from the term.16 In
Exodus 19 God called Israel first a “kingdom,” that is, a
people gathered and organized by Him and in Him as
their King (Ex. 15:17–18), the King who is over all nations.
And, with its reference to a whole people, Exodus 19’s
concept of “priest” reaches beyond the Sunday school
image and is richly freighted with the theology that laid
a foundation for Israel of old, and then reverberates
through the New Testament royal priesthood of 1 Peter
2. To ignore the wider ideas and meaning risks at least
impoverishing, if not distorting, our understanding of
what God would have us know about who His people have been and who they now are. Mindful of this
identity we then see what God would have them — and
us — to do.
When God called all of Israel His kingdom of priests
in Exodus 19, He made clear that their noble identity was
graciously bestowed — a reality that continues whenever God adds to His “great cloud of witnesses” (Heb.
12:1). The undeserved kindness and mercy — the sheer
grace of God — which is taught from the time of the Fall
(Gen. 3:15) is made certain also in Exodus 19: God initi15
That was God’s intent from the beginning of Israel’s story. See Gen.
12:3; also Ex. 12:48–49; Num. 9:14; 15:13–16; 1 Kings 8:41–43; Is. 56:6–8;
60:1–3; and examples: Rahab (Josh. 2 and 6), Ruth (Ruth 1–4), and
the Ninevites (Jonah 1–4). Deuteronomy 4:6–8 provides the intended
16
As noted above, on pages 3 and 4. Similarly, the Trinity exists and
is at work whether or not the term is present. We will return to this
important distinction between priest and function/work.
THE ROYAL PRIESTHOOD
|
The royal priesthood therefore has its explicit beginning with the people of God in the Old Testament
before there were any of the Levitical priests we tend
to associate with Old Testament priesthood. However,
before we address the details of the “royal priesthood,” it
is important to know what a priest is. The first priest to
be mentioned by that title in Scripture is the mysterious
Melchizedek, “priest of God Most High,” who blessed
Abram in God’s name and supplied him with bread and
wine (Gen. 14:17–20). As priesthood then unfolds in the
Old Testament, we see that it is a work of mediation: offering “gifts and sacrifices for sin” (e.g., Lev. 6:1–7; cp. Heb.
5:1), offering supplication and prayer (e.g., Ezra 9:5–15; cp.
Heb. 5:7), and proclaiming God’s blessings (Deut. 27:9–
28:68; Mal. 2:1–7; Heb. 7:1).
Luther summarizes this well:
According to the way the Scriptures picture him,
a priest is a person whom God has ordained and
commanded to mediate between God and men.
That is to say, a priest comes from God and brings
us His Word and doctrine; again, he presents
himself to God to sacrifice and pray for us. Hence
the priestly office consists of three parts: to teach
or preach God’s Word, to sacrifice, and to pray. All
three of these functions are abundantly referred to
in the Scriptures.10
10
Sermon on Psalm 110, AE 13:315; emphasis added. Note also this
characterization of the priest’s function: “The essential function of the
Levitical priesthood is therefore to assure, maintain, and constantly
re-establish the holiness of the elect people of God (cf. Ex. 28:38; Lev.
10:17; Num. 18:1)” (“Priests and Levites,” Interpreter’s Dictionary of the
Bible vol. 4 [Nashville: Abingdon, 1962], 877–78).
I. THE OLD TESTAMENT BACKGROUND
reaction of the nations to Israel’s witness.
Note Exodus 7:16: “And you shall say to him [Pharaoh], ‘The Lord,
the God of the Hebrews, sent me to you, saying, “Let my people go, that
they may serve me in the wilderness. But so far, you have not obeyed.”’”
14
229
4
ates, He promises, He forgives, He redeems. As is seen
constantly and consistently in the Scriptures, salvation
verbs and redemption motifs have God as the actor, the
doer, with people being acted upon. No status is achieved
from the bottom up. Thus, priesthood in Scripture, of
whatever sort, is also a gift, a blessing graciously bestowed on people called into a relationship with Him to
carry out His will, to be His instruments — “no one takes
this honor for himself ” (Heb. 5:4).
“Carry out” — carry out a task, carry out God’s will,
etc. — is the language of a servant. God names His
people priests in a gracious bestowal by His initiative.
In this identity He also calls them to meaningful life.
Indeed, the “priests” are to serve God’s good purposes.
Biblically speaking, to serve can be a form of worship.
So the priests are God’s own “treasured possession” who
hear His voice and keep His covenant (Ex. 19:5). A priest
hears and keeps covenant, and he never stands alone for
he serves within the covenant people. There is service
to the One who made priests what they are, and service
not to self but to all others within the covenant. And as
the people of God, they were servants and mediators of
God’s salvation to the world. Toward others, the priest’s
most important task was to teach, broadly speaking —
that is, to bear witness to that God-created identity with
one’s life and to declare what God has and continues to
do both for that “priest” and for others God would have
in that number.
This teaching work has been there since Genesis
when what God said and did was given to Adam and Eve
to remember and repeat. They too were priests as they
carried out work and carried forth God’s revelation — as
they served in both a narrow and broad sense of liturgy.17 They were priests as were any and all who faithfully
echoed the same in the generations that followed. Such
worship says back to God what He says to us as it confesses faith and then boldly petitions His benefits. Saying
the message, the promises, to others is also God’s work,
also liturgy, broadly speaking. This relationship and work
is also sacrificial in a broad sense, remembering and
handing on what God gave in His giving of grace and
mercy, serving as priests both before and beyond anything strictly Levitical. It is a sacrifice made in joy that
enriches, not impoverishes, those who give in service.
17
Melanchthon’s commentary on the term “liturgy” is valuable here, for
it shows that the word need not be understood only narrowly in purely
cultic terms. Ap XXIV 78–88, The Book of Concord: The Confessions of
the Evangelical Lutheran Church, ed. Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000), 272–74. Hereafter KW.
I. THE OLD TESTAMENT BACKGROUND
6
2019 Convention Workbook