Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 207
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 207
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Page 525
Page 526
Page 527
Page 528
Page 529
Page 530
Page 531
Page 532
Page 533
Page 534
Page 535
Page 536
Page 537
Page 538
Page 539
Page 540
Page 541
Page 542
Page 543
Page 544
Page 545
Page 546
Page 547
Page 548
Page 549
Page 550
Page 551
Page 552
Page 553
Page 554
Page 555
Page 556
Page 557
Page 558
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
I. OPINIONS OF COMMISSION ON CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS
confessional foundations that undergird what we believe, teach,
and confess. Though another denomination may accept the
course work provided at an educational institution of the Synod
as satisfactory for their requirements, it goes without saying that
what our schools teach is in no way to be adjusted to minimize
the truth of our doctrines (cf. Const. Art. III 1). CUS is responsible for assisting the President in his supervision of this area
(Bylaw 3.6.6.5 [g]).
Finally, the Synod itself retains authority for ecumenical
relations, an authority vested in its President as chief ecumenical officer (Bylaw 3.3.1.1.2 [c]).
The commission addresses both questions in one opinion:
Question 1: Would the President of the Synod, as chief
ecumenical officer, need to approve such arrangements?
Question 2: Do the universities need to communicate the
conditions under which such instruction is being
offered so that no confusion arises with respect to
the respective denominations’ doctrinal confessions and practices?
Opinion: If recognition of credits were the extent of the memorandum of understanding, and the content of the teaching
were not adjusted to suit heterodox church bodies, the commission does not believe that this would constitute an “ecumenical
agreement” requiring such approval. Nonetheless, the Office of
the President should certainly be informed in advance of any
such potential agreement and be given opportunity to fully
address any concerns related thereto. Terms and conditions of
any such agreement must be fully disclosed, as they are subject
to the proper oversight and/or supervision of the CUS and
the President of the Synod. Communication with the Office of
the President is an obligation both of the school and of CUS,
which has the responsibility to “assist the President of the
Synod in monitoring and promoting the ongoing faithfulness
of Concordia University System colleges and universities to
Article II of the Constitution of the Synod” (Bylaw 3.6.6.5 [g]).
Adopted August 17–18, 2018
Prior Approval of Adjunct Concordia University
System Theological Faculty (18-2891)
The President of the Concordia University System (CUS)
posed a question of the commission:
Question: Does Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 require adjunct as well as
full-time theology professors to be vetted in the
same manner?
Opinion: In 2013 the Synod in convention restored the process
of prior approval for initial appointments of theology faculty
at CUS institutions (2013 Proceedings, p. 140) but with a
different process than the process appointed for seminary
faculties (2016 Bylaw 3.10.5.7.3 [a]). In 2016 the Synod in
convention further refined this process by removing the words
all initial full-time and thereby extending this process to all
appointments and calls without qualification other than the
single exception expressed in the referenced Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3.
The Board of Directors of the CUS has responsibility, under
Bylaw 3.6.6.1, to facilitate the process:
207
3.6.6.1
The Board of Directors of the Concordia
University System has authority with respect to the
Synod’s colleges and universities. It shall have the
overall responsibility to provide for the education of
pre-seminary students, ministers of religion—commissioned, other professional church workers of the
Synod, and others desiring a Christian liberal arts
education by facilitating prior approval as set forth
in Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 for theology appointments to
college/university faculties and by coordinating the
activities of the Synod’s colleges and universities as a
unified system of the Synod through their respective
boards of regents.
The authority and process delineated in Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3
(adopted 2016, Proceedings, pp. 178–9) clearly places under
the purview of this prior approval all manner of appointments
and calls related to theological teaching responsibilities, with a
single exception (italicized):
3.10.6.7.3
All initial appointments to persons serving
on theology faculties, or teaching classes in or crosslisted with the theology department, shall require prior approval by a majority vote of the President of the
Synod (or his designee), the chairman of the Council
of Presidents (or his designee), and a member of the
Concordia University System board selected by the
chair, and shall include a thorough theological review.
The three voters shall be ordained. The process shall
be facilitated by the president of Concordia University System. Initial appointment refers to the initial engagement of any person to teach one or more theology
courses, regardless of assigned academic department,
other than faculty who teach theology courses no more
than one academic year in any three-year period.
2016 Bylaw 3.10.6.7.3 thus—like the corresponding seminary prior approval bylaw, Bylaw 3.10.5.7.3 (a)—requires approval for “all initial appointments,” whether full- or part-time.
The bylaw does make exception for college and university faculty who teach theology courses no more than one academic year
in any three-year period. Though this provision was granted to
give the broadest latitude to the individual school so that timely
response may be given to changing conditions and non-traditional formats, it does not relieve the individual board of regents
or the president of the school from their solemn responsibility
to both the theological integrity of the classroom with respect
to our confessional standard as a church (cf. Bylaw 3.10.6.7.2,
which applies to all full- and part-time faculty, whether with
theological teaching responsibilities or not) and to providing
the highest quality education for the benefit of the student.
Absent any other specific exception, the requirement for
prior approval also applies to adjunct as well as full-time theological professors and the same process applies to both, and, by
extension, to any other category of initial appointment of those
who teach theological courses in a college or university within
the CUS system.
Adopted August 17–18, 2018
2019 Convention Workbook