LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 248

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

248

II. THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
In Christ All Things Hold Together: The Intersection of Science and Christian Theology
A Bible Study and Discussion Guide

This study guide may be used alone or as a companion to In Christ All Things Hold Together:
The Intersection of Science and Christian Theology, a 2015 report of the LCMS Commission on
Theology and Church Relations. The headings for the introduction and six sessions of this
discussion guide provide the corresponding page numbers from the CTCR report.

The above comments, while perhaps extreme in their views, praise science for its unfailing
ability to “get things right.” Such comments illustrate the fact that our Western culture is
increasingly influenced by scientism, “the view that science is the only source of knowledge”
(21). 3 Scientism “leads people to regard literature, philosophy and religion as unverifiable relics
of our pre-scientific past, sources which can no longer contribute to a serious conversation about
what is really true” (6). Another popular worldview is secularism, the idea that “religious
believers can retain the therapeutic benefits of belief in the supernatural within the privacy of
their own minds, provided secular ideologies define public fact” (6). According to secularism,
faith is an inward, personal and private matter, while life in public, life in “the real world,” is
governed by scientific fact and secular worldviews.

Introduction: The Challenge of Scientism
Influenced by such worldviews, Christians may begin to think that God and faith have no place
in their daily lives and that God is not at work in ordinary events and in their daily callings.
Christians with careers in the sciences may find it impossible to believe that a biblical worldview
could contribute to the framework of assumptions on which scientific knowledge is built.

Session 1: Theological Foundations I
Session 2: Theological Foundations II
Session 3: Historical Context
Session 4: Philosophical Issues
Session 5: Biblical Knowledge and Scientific Knowledge
Session 6: Practical Applications
Introduction: The Challenge of Scientism (pages 5–15)
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” said in an interview, “The scientific method … is certainly, I
believe, the best idea that anybody’s ever had. So, if you choose not to accept what you discover
using that method, what else are you not going to discover? I guess it threatens everything: Our
ability to generate energy, to build cars, to fight diseases, to regulate traffic. So not accepting the
method by which we discovered evolution, you really are combating all sorts of things you may
not have intended to combat or ignore.” 1
The author of an article in National Geographic writes that “evolution actually happened.
Biology is incomprehensible without it. There aren’t really two sides to all these issues. Climate
change is happening. Vaccines really do save lives. Being right does matter—and the science
tribe has a long track record of getting things right in the end. Modern society is built on things
it got right.” 2

1
Elizabeth Quill and Helen Thompson, “Bill Nye on the Risks of Not Debating With Creationists”
Smithsonian.com, November 6, 2014, http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/bill-nye-risks-not-debatingcreationists-180953249/?no-ist.
2
Joel Achenbach, “Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science,” National Geographic Magazine (March
2015), at http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/science-doubters/achenbach-text.

Different methods of addressing the relationship of science and religion have been proposed as
attempts to relieve the tension between the two fields of study. For example the NOMA, or “nonoverlapping magisteria,” view suggests that “religion concerns issues of ultimate value (telling
us how to go to heaven), while science tells us how the temporal world operates (how the
heavens go)” (7). The NOMA approach sounds inviting because there is some truth to the
principle that religion and science have differing areas of concern. “Non-overlapping,” however,
is a falsehood that becomes destructive to both. According to NOMA, a Christian scientist would
have to live life on two tracks, a faith track and a work track, doing science just as an atheist
would. A related proposal suggests that interpreting Scripture in different ways might make it
easier to accept claims of science. The NOMA approach wrongly places scientific theories on the
same level as the Word of God. God’s Word has an eternal and ultimate validity, while even the
best scientific theories are the products of finite, fallen minds and may, at some future date, be
overturned in favor of new theories.
The report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations, In Christ All Things Hold
Together: The Intersection of Science and Christian Theology, provides guidance in addressing
the relationship of science and religion. The report helps Christians address real and perceived
tensions between science and theology and encourages them in refuting scientism. We need to
recover the understanding of science as a vocation that glorifies God and helps us to serve our
neighbor. Christian scientists and philosophers can encourage an ongoing dialogue between
Scripture and scientific theories and provide evidence that this is a created world and that human
beings are a special part of God’s creation. The CTCR study and this study guide provide
opportunities for informed discussion so the Church can more effectively respond to challenges
and encourage Christians to pursue careers in science.

Page numbers in parentheses are taken from In Christ All Things Hold Together: The Intersection of Science and
Christian Theology, a report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod (February 2015). The subheadings in bold print in this discussion guide are taken from In Christ All
Things Hold Together.

3

1

The sessions of this study guide will discuss the following topics from In Christ All Things Hold
Together:
•
•
•
•
•

Theological resources for understanding the nature and purpose of science; considering
God’s two books (Sessions 1 and 2)
The historical factors leading to the idea that science and religion have nothing to do with
each other (Session 3)
A response to the assumptions of contemporary worldviews; why Christianity provides a
good foundation for science (Session 4)
Principles of interpreting Scripture and guidance in reading portions of Scripture that
have apparent scientific meaning (Session 5)
Guidance for Christian students, teachers, scientists and laity (Session 6)

2

Session 1: Theological Foundations I (Chapter 1, pages 16–24)
“In this bewildering world we have to decide what to believe and how to act on that. In principle
that’s what science is for. ‘Science is not a body of facts,’ says geophysicist Marcia McNutt, who
once headed the U.S. Geological Survey and is now editor of Science, the prestigious journal.
‘Science is a method for deciding whether what we choose to believe has a basis in the laws of
nature or not.’” 4
“Religion is man-made. Even the men who made it cannot agree on what their prophets or
redeemers or gurus actually said or did. Still less can they hope to tell us the ‘meaning’ of later
discoveries and developments which were, when they began, either obstructed by their religions
or denounced by them. And yet—the believers still claim to know! Not just to know, but to know
everything.” 5
“Your commandment makes me wiser than my enemies, for it is ever with me. I have more
understanding than all my teachers, for your testimonies are my meditation … The sum of your
word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever” (Psalm 119:98–99, 160).
As the above comments and the verses from Scripture indicate, there are differing ideas
concerning our sources of knowledge. Are the things we know and believe based on science, on
the Word of God or on both? Do scientists know things, while Christians can only believe?
“Epistemological” questions are questions about our sources of knowledge, questions about how
we know things. They are questions of authority. Do we think that scientific observation and
human reason are the most authoritative sources for reliable belief, or do we accept Scripture as
the final word? If science appears to be in conflict with the Bible, how do we decide the dispute?
Theologians have said that God reveals Himself in two books, the book of Scripture (God’s
Word) and the book of nature (God’s works). Do these two books have equal authority, or does
one take precedence over the other? What is the proper relationship between His two books?
Increasing numbers of books on science and religion (for example, The God Delusion, by
Richard Dawkins; Breaking the Spell, by Daniel Dennett; and A Universe from Nothing, by
Lawrence Krauss) assume that science is the highest authority. The New Atheists, such as the
authors listed, and other opponents of biblical Christianity state that our beliefs about God are in
reality defined by what science reveals. These opponents assume that ideas about God arise from
the human brain, and that we must determine which idea about God is most useful for ourselves
and for the communities in which we live.
How would you respond to the following statement? “Brain imaging techniques, especially
functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have located regions of the brain where certain

4
Joel Achenbach, “Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science?” National Geographic (March 2015),
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/science-doubters/achenbach-text.
5
Christopher Hitchens, God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (New York: Hachette Book Group,
2007), 10.

3

2019 Convention Workbook

4