Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 77
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 77
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
CONVENTION ESSAYS AND BIBLE STUDIES
the greatest human need? Obviously, it will be the need for
truth, the need for transcendence, and the need for something to believe in that is bigger than the self. The Nation
of Islam has been able to effectively reach the AfricanAmerican community because they know what they believe.
Louis Farrakhan is most certainly not a wishy-washy, sensitive, baby-boomer, postmodern relativist.
Rather than seeking to accommodate the culture, I believe we should display the same courage recently demonstrated by the Southern Baptist Convention and counter
the culture.20 To do that, we as a church body are uniquely
positioned. We did not sell out our doctrinal integrity to the
modern culture of rationalism. We have refrained from ecumenical relationships that would have compromised doctrinal truth. We have remained a confessional church. We
know what we believe and why we believe it. We hopefully
still know the difference between Law and Gospel and are
able to identify those distortions that muddy the message of
pure grace. We have never been ashamed to declare that
our Lord Jesus is the only Way, and the only Truth, and
the only Life. To remove from our shelves or marginalize
those ingredients of our doctrinal theology and practice that
identify us as a church committed to unashamedly profess,
proclaim, and defend truth is strategic foolishness.
Doing biblical evangelism in a postmodern age provides
a uniquely fascinating challenge. We have the pure Gospel.
Let’s understand it and proclaim it. We are stubborn and
hard-nosed when it comes to issues of truth. Let’s not be
ashamed of it. The culture says there is no absolute truth.
Do we have the courage to joyfully challenge it? Will we be
considered politically incorrect and mean-spirited? Yes, but
so what? Why would we want to be popular in an irrational
age?21 If we are more concerned with being faithful to the
truth handed down to us than with being popular among
postmodernists, God will most certainly grant us the grace
to reach the casualties of this chaotic age!
Donald G. Matzat
Host, “Issues, Etc.”
KFUO Radio
Notes
1. Dr. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, explains postmodernity: “Modernity has given way to postmodernity, which is simply
modernity in its latest guise. Claiming that all notions
of truth are socially constructed, the postmodernists
are committed to total war on truth itself, a deconstructionist project bent on casting down all religions,
philosophical, political, and cultural authorities”
(Boice and Sasse, Here We Stand [Grand Rapids:
Baker Book House, 1996], p. 61).
2. Gene Edward Veith in Postmodern Times echoes the
same sentiments. He points out that for postmodernists, truth claims are actually “power plays.” He
writes: “For the deconstructionists, all truth claims
are suspect and are treated as a cover-up for power
plays. Reason, objective truth, science, and all ‘Western claims to serenely self-aware rationality’ are challenged ... Deconstructionism represents a new kind of
77
relativism, one that is intellectually sophisticated,
theoretically grounded, and methodologically rigorous
... Today’s universities, while ostensibly devoted to
cultivating truth, now argue that truth does not exist.
This does not mean that the universities are closing
their doors. Rather, the universities are redefining
what scholarship is all about” (Postmodern Times
[Crossway Books: Wheaton, IL, 1994], pp. 56–57).
3. David Wells writes: “The right of each individual to
his or her own private thoughts and beliefs is held to
be both axiomatic and inviolable. So it is that the particularities of evangelical faith—the things that make
it different—are dissolved. Modern culture grants me
absolute freedom to believe whatever I want to believe—so long as I keep those beliefs from infringing
on the consciousness or behavior of anyone else, especially on points of controversy” (God in the Wasteland
[Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994], p. 27).
4. Dr. Mohler writes: “Indeed, in many denominations
and churches, notions of orthodoxy and heresy have
become ‘conceptual emptiness.’ The boundaries have
vanished. The very possibility of heresy is dismissed
in many circles within Protestantism” (Here We
Stand, p. 61). On my daily radio program, I interviewed an ELCA theologian who had written an excellent article on the subject of justification. When I
asked him how the Lutheran understanding of justification differs from the Roman Catholic understanding, he responded, “Well, that’s their truth.” So while
Lutherans have their truth, Roman Catholics have
their truth. Even though the propositional statements
defining that truth are contradictory, to the postmodern thinker, that makes no difference. Both are true.
5. Christ consciousness: “New Age idea taken from eastern mysticism and Gnosticism that each person possesses the ‘divine spark’ which we must realize or attain” (William Watson, A Concise Dictionary of Cults
and Religions [Chicago: Moody Press, 1991], p. 52).
6. Henry Knight writes: “In contrast to modernity, the
postmodern world is happily populated by a host of
particular claims, with an accompanying diversity of
cultures and beliefs. The particularity of Jesus Christ
is in itself not problematic to postmodernity. It is the
claim that Jesus is of universal redemptive significance that it finds difficult—a ‘scandal of universality’ ” (A Future for Truth [Nashville: Abingdon, 1997],
p. 70).
7. David Koresh and Waco, Marshall Applewhite and
Heaven’s Gate, Betty Eadie’s “Embraced by the
Light,” Helen Schucman’s “Course in Miracles,”
James Redfield’s “The Celestine Prophecy,” Elizabeth
Clare Prophet and the “Church Triumphant and Universal,” Jose Silva and “Mind Control,” Deepak
Chopra, and Marianne Williamson all appreciate
Jesus. The primary guru of the New Age movement,
Dr. Carl Gustav Jung, taught that the “Christ archetype” could be activated and encountered via active
imagination or visualization. People today choose
Jesus to be their spirit-guide. As they visualize him,