Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 61

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 61

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
lieve, teach, and confess as a church body. It is not just
something that begins and ends with confirmation. As we
go about this important task of catechesis, that is, as we
underscore, teach, declare, proclaim, and put into practice
the truths of God’s Holy Word in our daily lives—and do it
in an unashamed, clear, and unambiguous manner—God
will bless. He really will! And the years ahead will also be
marked by our continuing to be a great church body in
Jesus Christ.
Practicing the Faith
But there is another point that needs to be made in this
connection. We as a Synod also need to recognize that
teaching the faith goes hand-in-hand with confessing and
practicing the faith. I need to sound a note of warning and
caution to our Synod. It is extremely tempting, particularly
in this our culture, which many are describing as “postmodern,” to water down, compromise, and otherwise overlook pure doctrine and correct practice. One of the most important lessons that the study of the church’s history
teaches is that when a church begins to look with disinterest on maintaining purity of doctrine and practice in its
midst, it begins to move away from the confession of the full
truth of the Word of God. And when that happens, the mission of the church suffers greatly, for no longer do people
look with urgency and excitement on the task of reaching
out to the lost and teaching them everything our Lord has
commanded us.
As you are no doubt aware, we have a number of important doctrinal resolutions before us at this convention. In
that respect, this convention is no different from previous
conventions. I recognize that a number of the doctrinal resolutions before us are emotionally charged. You as delegates have a solemn duty to make decisions based not on
sentiment or emotion, but on solid theological reasoning,
and upon the biblical and confessional truths that have
marked us down through the years.
Unity in Doctrine and Practice
A number of the doctrinal matters before us involve the
important question of our unity in doctrine and practice—
let me repeat that—in doctrine and practice—as a church
body. These sorts of doctrinal resolutions involve questions
of how we go about studying issues together and making
decisions together as a church family. We are a Synod. This
means that we are committed not merely to walking down
a somewhat similar road together, but actually walking the
same road, and walking down it together—united in both
doctrine and those practices that are drawn from and flow
from pure doctrine.
It is precisely for the sake of unity in both doctrine and
practice among us, that our Synod adopts doctrinal resolutions that affirm and carry out our commitment to the
truth of the Word of God and the Lutheran Confessions.
One of the doctrines that is very important for our Synod
is the doctrine and practice of church fellowship.
As a Synod, on the basis of the teachings of God’s Word,
we agree together and make a solemn promise to one another that our pastors will not officiate in worship services
with clergymen of church bodies with which we are not in

61

fellowship. This position is clearly stated in the Constitution and Bylaws of our Synod and has been affirmed repeatedly in convention resolution after convention resolution. It is nothing new within our fellowship. It is clearly
the position of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. It
is inappropriate to portray this truth in any other manner,
as though our Synod is unclear on this issue.
Expectations and Duties of Synod’s Elected Officials
There is an equally important issue before us as we consider these important doctrinal resolutions. Let me explain
this issue in the form of a question I have asked when I am
with groups of our pastors and lay leaders all across the
Synod. It this question: “What is your expectation of me as
synodical President and all the other elected officers of our
Synod when it comes to the doctrines and practices of our
church body? Do you want your synodical President, or any
other elected officer of this church body, to pick and choose
which doctrinal resolutions they will carry out, and which
they will choose not to carry out, or ignore?” The answer is
always resoundingly clear: “We expect you, and for that
matter, all of the other elected officials of our Synod and
Districts to carry out our church body’s positions.” The reason why this is always the response I receive is because our
people recognize that if our Synod is going to go the route of
a “pick and choose” approach when it comes to our Synod’s
doctrinal positions, this will be the first step in the dismantling of the Missouri Synod and everything that it
stands for. It is just this simple.
I need to make it very clear that our Synod does not expect perfection from our elected leaders, but we do expect
them to carry out their duties faithfully and consistently.
And when and where this does not happen, we as a church
body have every right, and even the solemn duty, to ask officials who have made errors in judgment to acknowledge
the inappropriateness of their actions and to provide assurance to the Synod that such errors will not be repeated.
To me, in addition to all the other things I have mentioned,
this is simply a matter of good old-fashioned common sense,
not to mention a matter of faithfulness to the duties of our
office as elected leaders of the Synod.
Again, I genuinely recognize that some of the issues before us at this convention are emotion filled. I would like
strongly to encourage you as delegates to look past the emotional rhetoric and consider the more important principles
and deeper issues involved, as I have sketched them here in
this the third part of my report to the Synod.

Outreach: the Challenge
and Opportunity
Now let me shift gears and direct your attention to the
second key word on which we wish to focus our attention,
namely Outreach.
For the past several months, in various settings, I have
shared with many people all across our Synod what we are
calling the “3/10 Emphasis.” It is a greatly increased emphasis in evangelism outreach on the part of our church
body as we move into the years directly ahead.