Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 53
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 53
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
re CET
ens Soelnah a ec RA aA SSE SRI
Be
¥
3
was withdrawn. Because section “k” (C W 80) had been
deleted from the proposed Bylawsina previous session,
and because the proposed Bylaws would not now include
a Bylaw relating to the matter of consolidation of
colleges, the delegates adopted a resolution substituting
section “py” (CW 80) of the present Handbook for the
proposed section “k” (CW 80). The floor committee
introduced Res. 2-14(TB52), which called fora broaden-
ing of the franchise within the Synod. Before introduc-
ing it, the word “congregation” was changed to “congre-
gations” in line 34, and lines 38—39 were deleted by the
floor committee (T° 'B 52). Before discussion of the resolu-
tion began, 4 question was raised as to whether or not
consideration of Res. 2-14 was out of order since Res.
9-01 (TB 45) had already been adopted by the conven-
tion. The Chair ruled that discussion was in order since
the specific matter referred to in Res. 2-14 had not been
considered. The Chair was sustained in this ruling after
an appeal had been made tothe convention. In response
to another question which asked whether it would not be
more proper to deal with Res. 2-15 (TB52) before dealing
with Res. 2-14 the delegates agreed to continuation of
discussion of the resolution which was on the floor. An
amendment which asked “that the congregation decide
who is to cast its two votes, one to be cast by a called
pastor or a called professional who has signed the
Constitution of the Synod and the other by a layperson
chosen from its communicant membership” was de-
clined by a vote of 326 to 497. In the continuing
discussion it was suggested that the words “the clergy
or’ be deleted in line 17(7B52) and the words “Including
clergymen who are not called as parish pastors, and
teachers” be replaced with the words “except those on
the clergy roster of the Synod.” After further discussion
the delegates adopted a motion which stated:
“WHEREAS, very little time is available to discuss Res.
9-14 and Res. 2-15 at this convention; therefore be it
Resolved, That action on the proposed Res. 2-14 and 2-15
’ be deferred until the 1983 convention, and be it further
Resolved, That the President of the Synod appoint a
committee, consisting of one pastor and two teachers and
three laypersons which shall report to the 1983 convention.
- ‘As its final resolution the Floor Committee on Task
Force presented Res. 92-20 (TB 63), which was adopted by
the convention and which provided additional proce-
dures for implementation of the changes in structure
which had been approved.
Point of Privilege
Responding to a point of privilege, one of the dele-
gates who had been a member of the Floor Committee
on Task Force made a short statement and then pre-
sented a resolution which was enthusiastically sup-
ported by the delegates. The resolution is as follows:
Wuereas, Task Force Il has completed its work in most
exemplary manner providing the basis for this convention
to establish a solid management structure for The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That this convention by passage of this
resolution expresses its appreciation for the valuable and
MINUTES OF THE CONVENTION 53
far-reaching contributions enabling The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod to better meet the mission challenges in the
decades ahead; and be it further
Resolved, That the President of the Synod prepare on
behalf of this convention an appropriate letter of thanks
and citation for presentation to each member of Task Force
IL.
Dr. Herbert Mueller, Secretary of the Synod and
chairman of Task Force II, addressed his thanks to the
delegates and especially to the members of the Task
Force for their dedication to the work which was
required in accomplishing this most difficult task. He
described what had occurred as a marvelous example of
group dynamics at work under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit. Dr. Preus also expressed his thanks to all who
were involved, especially commending the delegates for
their patience and understanding.
Recognition
Dr. Nelson Unwene, who had recently received an
honorary doctor of divinity degree from Concordia
Theological Seminary, Ft. Wayne, was introduced to the
convention. Dr. Unwene, president of the Lutheran
Church of Nigeria, described the work of his church,
including difficulties which are faced at a time when
there is a trend towards secularization among those
involved in decision-making for the country. He ex-
pressed his thanks for the cordial partnership which
had been experienced with the Synod under the leader-
ship of Dr. Preus and looked forward to that same
partnership under his former instructor, President-elect
Bohlmann.
Higher Education
Chairman Behnken of the Floor Committee on High-
er Education introduced Res. 6-05A (TB 261). Prior to
presenting it all references in the resolution to Alabama
Lutheran Academy and College were changed to “Con-
cordia College, Selma” and the number “10,000” was
changed to “60,000” in line 34 (TB 261). By adopting this
resolution the delegates agreed that Concordia College,
Selma should be exempted from the Board for Higher
Education’s subsidy policy through the 1985—86 school
year. The delegates also agreed thata feasibility study
should be made with regard to the possibility of a four-
year college at Selma by adoption of Res. 6-07A (TB 237).
This action was taken after the words “and other
locations in the southeast quadrant of the country” had
been deleted from line 16 (TB 238), and the words
“Concordia College” were inserted prior to the word
“Selma” in the same line. An additional resolved was
also added, stating: “Resolved, That Overture 6-57 and
6-58 be referred to the Board for Higher Education.”
Since an internal administrative responsibility was
involved, the matter of additional funding for Concordia
College of Selma was referred to the Board of Directors
for final implementation by adoption of Res. 6-06A (TB
237).
Through adopting Res. 6-08A (TB 238) the conven-
tion instructed the Board for Higher Education in
consultation with the Hispanic Advisory Council, the