Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 222
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 222
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
-45B
To Reassign Responsibility
for Suggesting Persons
for Doctrinal Review
(The Board of Parish Education submitted an overture on
E.. this subject. Later it withdrew the overture for submission of a
: gubsequent overture. This replacement was received later but
failed to find its way into the Workbook. In fairness we are
herewith printing the whereases. The resolved is identical to
the resolved of Overture 3-45.)
WHEREAS, The primary concern of Synod’s process
of doctrinal review is that the doctrine set forth in public
materials which speak for our Synod should “be in
accord with the Scriptures and the Lutheran Con-
fessions” (Handbook, 11.151b, page 215); and
WHEREAS, There have been occasions when this
objective has not been achieved, even though the publica-
tions in question had gone through the entire present
process of doctrinal review (e.g., cases in which the
Board of Parish Education has felt compelled to instruct
its staff to withdraw certain publications from the
market even after some copies had already been sold,
along with other cases in which either the sharpness of
the Law or the sweetness of the Gospel were lacking in
publications already on the market); and
WHEREAS, In the present system names for the
position of doctrinal reviewer are now suggested by
many whose field of expertise is not in the area of
Christian doctrine (cf. Handbook, 11.155a, page 216) but
rather in education, youth work, cross-cultural matters,
journalism, etc.; and
WHEREAS, In establishing a process for doctrinal
review the Synod was not concerning itself. with the
quality of its publications from the standpoints of these
other areas of expertise essential as they may be, but
from the standpoint of whether their doctrinal content
was in agreement with the Scriptures and the Lutheran
Confessions; and _
WHEREAS, There are within the Synod three official
groups whose area of expertise is Christian doctrine
itself, namely, the faculties of our two synodical sem-
inaries and the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations; therefore be it
Resolved, ...
Board of Parish Education
Raymond A. Mueller, Secretary
L4-39
To Transfer Salem, Westland, Mich.,
from English to Michigan District
Salem National Evangelical Church at its quarterly
meeting on April 26, 1981, voted unanimously to request
LATE REPORTS AND OVERTURES
(Bylaw 1.27b)
transfer of its membership from the English District to
the Michigan District.
This action was taken after both President Borne-
mann and President Schlecht had met with the Church
Council. Letters are being sent requesting transfer
and acceptance to both District Presidents.
Salem National Ev. Lutheran Church
Westland, Mich.
Norbert C. Leppanen, President
Orval McKnight, Secretary
Paavo J. Frusti, Pastor
L5-07
__ To Not Receive Messiah
Lutheran Church, Pittsburg, Kans.,
into Synodical Membership
WHEREAS, Scripture declares (Romans 16:17), “Mark
them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the
doctrine which ye have learned, and avoid them”; and
WHEREAS, The synodical Handbook, page 94, para-
graph 3.109, Principles of Division, is violated in that
the division that occurred in Zion Congregation in
February of 1979 was not the result of outgrowing a
facility, nor was it under amiable circumstances, neither
was there a need for a mission congregation in Pitts-
burg, Kans., and such division does disturb the church;
and ‘
WHEREAS, Zion and Messiah Congregations are not
in doctrinal agreement in such areas as unionistic
practices, communing nonmembers, the use of the
Lutheran Book of Worship; and
WHEREAS, It is the belief also of the ALC pastor, Rev.
Conrad Ide, that there is no need for another Lutheran
altar in Pittsburg, in view of the numerous churches
already represented here; therefore be it
Resolved, That membership in the LCMS be declined
to Messiah Lutheran Church of Pittsburg, Kans.
Zion Lutheran Church
Pittsburg, Kans.
William Grotheer, Chairman
Henry G. Ludeke, Secretary
L5-08
To Receive Trinity Lutheran Church
of Litchfield Park, Ariz.,
into Membership
WHEREAS, Trinity Lutheran Church of Litchfield
Park, Ariz., is a newly organized congregation and is
‘incorporated under the laws of the State of Arizona; and
WHEREAS, The Constitution Committee of the South-
ern California District has reviewed the constitution