Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 222

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 222

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

-45B

To Reassign Responsibility
for Suggesting Persons
for Doctrinal Review

(The Board of Parish Education submitted an overture on

E.. this subject. Later it withdrew the overture for submission of a
: gubsequent overture. This replacement was received later but

failed to find its way into the Workbook. In fairness we are
herewith printing the whereases. The resolved is identical to
the resolved of Overture 3-45.)

WHEREAS, The primary concern of Synod’s process
of doctrinal review is that the doctrine set forth in public
materials which speak for our Synod should “be in
accord with the Scriptures and the Lutheran Con-
fessions” (Handbook, 11.151b, page 215); and

WHEREAS, There have been occasions when this
objective has not been achieved, even though the publica-
tions in question had gone through the entire present
process of doctrinal review (e.g., cases in which the
Board of Parish Education has felt compelled to instruct
its staff to withdraw certain publications from the
market even after some copies had already been sold,
along with other cases in which either the sharpness of
the Law or the sweetness of the Gospel were lacking in
publications already on the market); and

WHEREAS, In the present system names for the
position of doctrinal reviewer are now suggested by
many whose field of expertise is not in the area of
Christian doctrine (cf. Handbook, 11.155a, page 216) but
rather in education, youth work, cross-cultural matters,
journalism, etc.; and

WHEREAS, In establishing a process for doctrinal
review the Synod was not concerning itself. with the
quality of its publications from the standpoints of these
other areas of expertise essential as they may be, but
from the standpoint of whether their doctrinal content
was in agreement with the Scriptures and the Lutheran
Confessions; and _

WHEREAS, There are within the Synod three official
groups whose area of expertise is Christian doctrine
itself, namely, the faculties of our two synodical sem-
inaries and the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations; therefore be it

Resolved, ...
Board of Parish Education
Raymond A. Mueller, Secretary

L4-39

To Transfer Salem, Westland, Mich.,
from English to Michigan District

Salem National Evangelical Church at its quarterly
meeting on April 26, 1981, voted unanimously to request

LATE REPORTS AND OVERTURES

(Bylaw 1.27b)

transfer of its membership from the English District to
the Michigan District.

This action was taken after both President Borne-
mann and President Schlecht had met with the Church
Council. Letters are being sent requesting transfer
and acceptance to both District Presidents.

Salem National Ev. Lutheran Church
Westland, Mich.

Norbert C. Leppanen, President
Orval McKnight, Secretary

Paavo J. Frusti, Pastor

L5-07

__ To Not Receive Messiah
Lutheran Church, Pittsburg, Kans.,
into Synodical Membership

WHEREAS, Scripture declares (Romans 16:17), “Mark
them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the
doctrine which ye have learned, and avoid them”; and

WHEREAS, The synodical Handbook, page 94, para-
graph 3.109, Principles of Division, is violated in that
the division that occurred in Zion Congregation in
February of 1979 was not the result of outgrowing a
facility, nor was it under amiable circumstances, neither
was there a need for a mission congregation in Pitts-
burg, Kans., and such division does disturb the church;
and ‘

WHEREAS, Zion and Messiah Congregations are not
in doctrinal agreement in such areas as unionistic
practices, communing nonmembers, the use of the
Lutheran Book of Worship; and

WHEREAS, It is the belief also of the ALC pastor, Rev.
Conrad Ide, that there is no need for another Lutheran
altar in Pittsburg, in view of the numerous churches
already represented here; therefore be it

Resolved, That membership in the LCMS be declined
to Messiah Lutheran Church of Pittsburg, Kans.

Zion Lutheran Church
Pittsburg, Kans.

William Grotheer, Chairman
Henry G. Ludeke, Secretary

L5-08
To Receive Trinity Lutheran Church
of Litchfield Park, Ariz.,
into Membership

WHEREAS, Trinity Lutheran Church of Litchfield
Park, Ariz., is a newly organized congregation and is

‘incorporated under the laws of the State of Arizona; and

WHEREAS, The Constitution Committee of the South-
ern California District has reviewed the constitution