# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1981_S53 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) re CET ens Soelnah a ec RA aA SSE SRI Be ¥ 3 was withdrawn. Because section “k” (C W 80) had been deleted from the proposed Bylawsina previous session, and because the proposed Bylaws would not now include a Bylaw relating to the matter of consolidation of colleges, the delegates adopted a resolution substituting section “py” (CW 80) of the present Handbook for the proposed section “k” (CW 80). The floor committee introduced Res. 2-14(TB52), which called fora broaden- ing of the franchise within the Synod. Before introduc- ing it, the word “congregation” was changed to “congre- gations” in line 34, and lines 38—39 were deleted by the floor committee (T° 'B 52). Before discussion of the resolu- tion began, 4 question was raised as to whether or not consideration of Res. 2-14 was out of order since Res. 9-01 (TB 45) had already been adopted by the conven- tion. The Chair ruled that discussion was in order since the specific matter referred to in Res. 2-14 had not been considered. The Chair was sustained in this ruling after an appeal had been made tothe convention. In response to another question which asked whether it would not be more proper to deal with Res. 2-15 (TB52) before dealing with Res. 2-14 the delegates agreed to continuation of discussion of the resolution which was on the floor. An amendment which asked “that the congregation decide who is to cast its two votes, one to be cast by a called pastor or a called professional who has signed the Constitution of the Synod and the other by a layperson chosen from its communicant membership” was de- clined by a vote of 326 to 497. In the continuing discussion it was suggested that the words “the clergy or’ be deleted in line 17(7B52) and the words “Including clergymen who are not called as parish pastors, and teachers” be replaced with the words “except those on the clergy roster of the Synod.” After further discussion the delegates adopted a motion which stated: “WHEREAS, very little time is available to discuss Res. 9-14 and Res. 2-15 at this convention; therefore be it Resolved, That action on the proposed Res. 2-14 and 2-15 ’ be deferred until the 1983 convention, and be it further Resolved, That the President of the Synod appoint a committee, consisting of one pastor and two teachers and three laypersons which shall report to the 1983 convention. - ‘As its final resolution the Floor Committee on Task Force presented Res. 92-20 (TB 63), which was adopted by the convention and which provided additional proce- dures for implementation of the changes in structure which had been approved. Point of Privilege Responding to a point of privilege, one of the dele- gates who had been a member of the Floor Committee on Task Force made a short statement and then pre- sented a resolution which was enthusiastically sup- ported by the delegates. The resolution is as follows: Wuereas, Task Force Il has completed its work in most exemplary manner providing the basis for this convention to establish a solid management structure for The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; therefore be it Resolved, That this convention by passage of this resolution expresses its appreciation for the valuable and MINUTES OF THE CONVENTION 53 far-reaching contributions enabling The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod to better meet the mission challenges in the decades ahead; and be it further Resolved, That the President of the Synod prepare on behalf of this convention an appropriate letter of thanks and citation for presentation to each member of Task Force IL. Dr. Herbert Mueller, Secretary of the Synod and chairman of Task Force II, addressed his thanks to the delegates and especially to the members of the Task Force for their dedication to the work which was required in accomplishing this most difficult task. He described what had occurred as a marvelous example of group dynamics at work under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Dr. Preus also expressed his thanks to all who were involved, especially commending the delegates for their patience and understanding. Recognition Dr. Nelson Unwene, who had recently received an honorary doctor of divinity degree from Concordia Theological Seminary, Ft. Wayne, was introduced to the convention. Dr. Unwene, president of the Lutheran Church of Nigeria, described the work of his church, including difficulties which are faced at a time when there is a trend towards secularization among those involved in decision-making for the country. He ex- pressed his thanks for the cordial partnership which had been experienced with the Synod under the leader- ship of Dr. Preus and looked forward to that same partnership under his former instructor, President-elect Bohlmann. Higher Education Chairman Behnken of the Floor Committee on High- er Education introduced Res. 6-05A (TB 261). Prior to presenting it all references in the resolution to Alabama Lutheran Academy and College were changed to “Con- cordia College, Selma” and the number “10,000” was changed to “60,000” in line 34 (TB 261). By adopting this resolution the delegates agreed that Concordia College, Selma should be exempted from the Board for Higher Education’s subsidy policy through the 1985—86 school year. The delegates also agreed thata feasibility study should be made with regard to the possibility of a four- year college at Selma by adoption of Res. 6-07A (TB 237). This action was taken after the words “and other locations in the southeast quadrant of the country” had been deleted from line 16 (TB 238), and the words “Concordia College” were inserted prior to the word “Selma” in the same line. An additional resolved was also added, stating: “Resolved, That Overture 6-57 and 6-58 be referred to the Board for Higher Education.” Since an internal administrative responsibility was involved, the matter of additional funding for Concordia College of Selma was referred to the Board of Directors for final implementation by adoption of Res. 6-06A (TB 237). Through adopting Res. 6-08A (TB 238) the conven- tion instructed the Board for Higher Education in consultation with the Hispanic Advisory Council, the