Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 119
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 119
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
hare our conviction that LCMS/ALC altar and
pulpit fellowship is God-pleasing and good, and is
to be affirmed with joy.
Weare grateful that this convention is encouraging
local LCMS congregations to be evangelical and
. pastoral in matters of LCMS/ALC fellowship.
We are grateful for those of you who, though dis-
agreeing with us, have handled the fellowship
question without resorting to caricatures of us
and the faith we share.
f course, we are deeply disappointed at the LCMS
0 wship vote. We are disappointed because we believe
"3¢ a denial of the God-pleasing unity that God has given
5. We are disappointed because it is a step backward in
the clear expressions of Lutheran unity that have
ypified U.S. Lutheran life in this century. We are
isappointed because we fear a Lutheran inclination to
ectarian isolation rather than a glad sharing of
trengths with fellow Christians, especially those in the
sutheran family.
« Itis true that we can get along without each other.
‘hat, however, is not the point. The point is that God
has called us to life together. He has made us one in
“Christ. He has brought us to a shared commitment to
he faith expressed in the Lutheran Confessions. Our
doctrinal. agreement is overwhelming. Together we
“affirm the triune God; salvation by grace through faith
“in Jesus Christ; that we cannot by our own reason or
‘gtrength believe in Jesus Christ our Lord but the Holy
‘Spirit has called us through the Gospel; that the living
Christ is truly present in the Word and sacraments; that
the Holy Scriptures are God’s Word, inspired and
authoritative; that good works are a result of faith
active in love and no cause whatever for merit before
God. Because of that shared faith, we in the ALC believe
that our altars and pulpits should be open to each other.
God has made us for each other and has brought us to
unity of faith precisely in order to bring us together in
worship and work.
There are articles of doctrine that can be debated
without being divisive of church fellowship. We in the
ALC think the the Missouri Synod-instituted formula of
“the Gospel and all its articles” is a mischievous phrase.
It is self-serving in that the LCMS determines what “all
the articles” are and then requires identical subscription
by all others in order for fellowship to exist. As a result,
the LCMS is officially in fellowship with almost no one,
for it is extremely difficult to arrive at uniformity of
My Dear Friends, Brothers and Sisters in Christ:
On behalf of the Lutheran Church in America, itis a
joy to bring you our most cordial greetings. I con-
gratulate your new President, Dr. Ralph Bohlmann,
and I look forward to working with him in every
possible way and especially through the Lutheran
Council in the U.S.A. The vitality of The Lutheran
GREETINGS OF THE BISHOP OF THE AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH 119
doctrine and practice. We believe the articles of faith
addressed in the ecumenical creeds and the Lutheran
Confessions cover all the essential doctrines on which
Christians agree. When we go beyond them, there is
need for the kind of theological debate that gradually
brings clarity to controverted articles. There will always
be some issues that are rising to the surface that will
require serious, open theological debate. The time for
settlement of such debates need not be pushed. And they
ought to include debate at all levels of the church’s life,
not just among official committees. The history of our
churches indicates that such controverted articles
gradually find solutions. One hundred years ago U.S.
Lutherans were in fierce theological debates over
slavery, the antichrist, and usury. Now, 100 years later,
those matters are not at issue. We think the same will
happen with issues such as the doctrine of inerrancy,
women’s ordination, and membership in ecumenical
organizations.
So how do we proceed from here? The ALC, together
with the LCA and AELC, intends to pursue a path of
increasing expressions of unity. It is with genuine
regret that we walk that path without The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod. We hope it will not be long
before the LCMS joins us in fully expressing the unity
God has created among us.
Meantime, one of your convention resolutions calls
for continued doctrinal discussions with the ALC. I am
confident the ALC will say yes to such discussons. The
people of our two churches live in the same communities,
we lift high the same confessions, we bear the same
name, our family members marry each other and join
each other’s churches, and the Lord of the church calls
us to express the unity that exists. If more discussion is
what is available to us, we will have more discussions.
They will include the fervent prayer that the discussions
will soon be replaced by God-pleasing expressions of
unity.
Wein the ALC believe that God-pleasing unity exists
among ALC and LCMS Lutherans. We believe that we
are brothers and sisters in Christ whether or not we are
able to say so in conventions assembled. We must
express our family unity, loyalty, and affection, and we
will do so to the best of our ability. Our doors, our hearts,
and our arms of fellowship are always open to you. For
we believe that Almighty God has called us to life in
Christ, together!
David W. Preus, D.D.
3. Greetings of the Bishop of the Lutheran Church in America
Church—Missouri Synod is apparent as one looks
through your convention agenda. I rejoice with you in
the overwhelming response to your Mission Appeal.
Through it and through much of your deliberation at
this convention, your ministry will be expanded as you
demonstrate your obedience to the mission of our Lord.
In the Lutheran Church in America, we are also