Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1935 · 36th Convention, Cleveland › Page 989

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1935, Page 989

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 5 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Sheet 106 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 108 Sheet 111 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Sheet 125 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Sheet 137 Page 181 Page 132 Page 188 Page 134 Page 188 Page 136 Page 187 Sheet 145 Page 189 Page 140 Sheet 148 Sheet 149 Page 148 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 149 Page 148 Page 151 Page 150 Page 158 Page 152 Page 155 Page 164 Page 157 Page 156 Page 159 Page 158 Page 161 Page 160 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Sheet 172 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Sheet 180 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Sheet 184 Page 179 Page 178 Page 181 Page 180 Page 183 Sheet 190 Page 185 Sheet 192 Page 187 Sheet 194 Page 189 Page 188 Page 191 Page 190 Page 193 Page 192 Page 195 Page 194 Page 197 Page 196 Page 499 Sheet 206 Sheet 207 Page 200 Sheet 209 Page 202 Page 905 Sheet 212 Page 207 Page 206 Page 209 Sheet 216 Page 211 Page 210 Page 213 Page 212 Page 915 Page 214 Page 217 Page 216 Page 218 Page 919 Sheet 227 Page 991 Page 999 Sheet 230 Page 224 Page 995 Page 296 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 284 Page 935 Page 236 Sheet 244 Page 238 Sheet 246 Page 240 Sheet 248 Page 242 Page 248 Page 244 Page 945 Page 246 Sheet 254 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 264 Page 256 Sheet 263 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Sheet 272 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 969 Page 270 Sheet 278 Page 272 Sheet 280 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Sheet 284 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 981 Page 282 Page 288 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 989 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 800 Page 801 Page 802 Page 308 Page 804 Page 805 Page 306 Page 807 Page 308 Sheet 316 Page 310 Page 811 Sheet 319 Sheet 320 Page 314 Sheet 322

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1935. 989

This report is the result of a most careful inquiry and deserves
study and consideration. It serves as an illustration of the possibili-
ties of a pension plan and indicates the essential features. Your Com-
mittee gave the entire pension question careful study. It is obvious
that because of lack of time and other circumstances neither your
.Committee nor Synod as a body can decide upon the technical details
of a pension plan.

Your Committee nevertheless believes that an elastic and flexible
pension plan is feasible and would be of great benefit to Synod. The
burden on our Support Fund would in time be relieved considerably.
We are reliably informed that the peak of the number of applicants
for support has not been reached. Moreover, little expense on the
part of Synod would be involved in initiating and maintaining a
pension system for its workers. Your Committee is aware that by
instituting a pension plan, Synod as such may urge the workers and
congregations, but cannot coerce them, to make fixed contributions
to a retirement pension fund.

Your Committee recommends : —

1. That Synod institute a pension system for its servants of the
Word;
2. That the pension plan be elastic and flexible in order to fit the
various conditions and possibilities obtaining in Synod;

3. That the plan be based on a safe and sound actuarial foun-
dation.

In order to carry out the proposed pension system, your Com-
mittee recommends furthermore: —

1. That Synod’s Board of Support, together with an Advisory
Pension Committee of not fewer than five members, appointed by the
Board of Directors, be directed to institute the pension system;

2. That the details of the plan and its execution must be approved
by Synod’s Board of Directors and’ the College of Presidents;

3. That’ the Board of Directors be authorized to make the neces-
sary expenditures incurred by the establishment of a pension system.

Your Committee also had the opportunity to study the pension
plan proposed by a legal-reserve association of fellow-Lutherans. The
plan has been prepared in detail by actuarial experts. Your Com-
mittee does not feel that it can make a definite recommendation
whether a pension system for our workers controlled by a corporation
or association other than Synod itself is advisable or not. It there-
fore proposes that this question be given into the hands of the Board
of Support, the Advisory Pension Committee, the Board of Directors,
and the College of Presidents, with power to. act.

- inAction of Synod. -
vw" This report with its recommendations was adopted.
19