Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1935 · 36th Convention, Cleveland › Page 196
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1935, Page 196
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 5
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Sheet 106
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 108
Sheet 111
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Sheet 125
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Sheet 137
Page 181
Page 132
Page 188
Page 134
Page 188
Page 136
Page 187
Sheet 145
Page 189
Page 140
Sheet 148
Sheet 149
Page 148
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 149
Page 148
Page 151
Page 150
Page 158
Page 152
Page 155
Page 164
Page 157
Page 156
Page 159
Page 158
Page 161
Page 160
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Sheet 172
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Sheet 180
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Sheet 184
Page 179
Page 178
Page 181
Page 180
Page 183
Sheet 190
Page 185
Sheet 192
Page 187
Sheet 194
Page 189
Page 188
Page 191
Page 190
Page 193
Page 192
Page 195
Page 194
Page 197
Page 196
Page 499
Sheet 206
Sheet 207
Page 200
Sheet 209
Page 202
Page 905
Sheet 212
Page 207
Page 206
Page 209
Sheet 216
Page 211
Page 210
Page 213
Page 212
Page 915
Page 214
Page 217
Page 216
Page 218
Page 919
Sheet 227
Page 991
Page 999
Sheet 230
Page 224
Page 995
Page 296
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 284
Page 935
Page 236
Sheet 244
Page 238
Sheet 246
Page 240
Sheet 248
Page 242
Page 248
Page 244
Page 945
Page 246
Sheet 254
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 264
Page 256
Sheet 263
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Sheet 272
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 969
Page 270
Sheet 278
Page 272
Sheet 280
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Sheet 284
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 981
Page 282
Page 288
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 989
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 800
Page 801
Page 802
Page 308
Page 804
Page 805
Page 306
Page 807
Page 308
Sheet 316
Page 310
Page 811
Sheet 319
Sheet 320
Page 314
Sheet 322
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
196 . Proceedings of Thirty-Sixth. Regular Convention,
“Dear BRETHREN IN THE LorD: —
“The undersigned committee was appointed by the President of
Synod pursuant to a resolution of the Delegate Convention of 1932.
This appointment resulted from overtures aiming. at the amalgama-
tion of the congregations of the present English District with those
of their respective geographical Districts. This committee was to
draw up reasons for an amalgamation and to take up the matter with
the English District at its next convention.
“Among reasons for an amalgamation we might mention the fol-
lowing : —
“1) An amalgamation will make for closer fraternal relations and
contacts among our pastors and result in a more closely knit synodical
body and a firmer structure of the whole organization, tending then
toward consummation in higher degree of some of the aims for which
Synod was organized and for which it conducts its work to-day.
“2) For a more unified participation in local projects, such as
city missions and young people’s work; for a closer and more effective
covering of the field and a more united defense against schism and
sectarianism; for throwing into the field in our metropolitan centers
the full weight of our forces as a united whole, with complete harmony
of interests and solidified energies,
“3) For a diffusion into wider circles of the progressive methods
in use in many of the English District churches and a quicker reali-
zation of many things for which the English District contends. It
stands to reason that the influence of men who stand for these things
will make itself felt more strongly if they exert it in the wider field.
“4) For a decided saving in money in regard to expense incurred
with relation to conventions, conferences, visitations, and the work of
mission boards and other committees. To illustrate: At a recent con-
vention of the English District only 49 lay delegates attended, while
106 congregations did not send a delegate. If every congregation had
sent its pastor and lay delegate, the total railroad fare including
Pullman would have amounted to $13,351.80. If the congregations
composing the English District had each sent their pastor and déle-
gate to the convention of the particular District in which they are
geographically located, the total fare would have amounted to
$3,334.96. Here alone a saving of $6,361.20 on railroad fare and of
$10,016.34 if Pullman fare is included. We can only guess at the sum
which is expended by pastors to attend conferences, by visitors and
officials and members of boards, in excess of what would be needed
after amalgamation takes place. The item of time required to do ‘all
this traveling would each year aggregate several years in the working-
hours of an individual. A greater loss. results for the congregations
from the inability to send a delegate, ‘because they are thus deprived
of the benefits derived from representation. at conventions.