Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1935 · 36th Convention, Cleveland › Page 196

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1935, Page 196

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 5 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Sheet 106 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 108 Sheet 111 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Sheet 125 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Sheet 137 Page 181 Page 132 Page 188 Page 134 Page 188 Page 136 Page 187 Sheet 145 Page 189 Page 140 Sheet 148 Sheet 149 Page 148 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 149 Page 148 Page 151 Page 150 Page 158 Page 152 Page 155 Page 164 Page 157 Page 156 Page 159 Page 158 Page 161 Page 160 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Sheet 172 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Sheet 180 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Sheet 184 Page 179 Page 178 Page 181 Page 180 Page 183 Sheet 190 Page 185 Sheet 192 Page 187 Sheet 194 Page 189 Page 188 Page 191 Page 190 Page 193 Page 192 Page 195 Page 194 Page 197 Page 196 Page 499 Sheet 206 Sheet 207 Page 200 Sheet 209 Page 202 Page 905 Sheet 212 Page 207 Page 206 Page 209 Sheet 216 Page 211 Page 210 Page 213 Page 212 Page 915 Page 214 Page 217 Page 216 Page 218 Page 919 Sheet 227 Page 991 Page 999 Sheet 230 Page 224 Page 995 Page 296 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 284 Page 935 Page 236 Sheet 244 Page 238 Sheet 246 Page 240 Sheet 248 Page 242 Page 248 Page 244 Page 945 Page 246 Sheet 254 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 264 Page 256 Sheet 263 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Sheet 272 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 969 Page 270 Sheet 278 Page 272 Sheet 280 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Sheet 284 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 981 Page 282 Page 288 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 989 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 800 Page 801 Page 802 Page 308 Page 804 Page 805 Page 306 Page 807 Page 308 Sheet 316 Page 310 Page 811 Sheet 319 Sheet 320 Page 314 Sheet 322

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

196 . Proceedings of Thirty-Sixth. Regular Convention,

“Dear BRETHREN IN THE LorD: —

“The undersigned committee was appointed by the President of
Synod pursuant to a resolution of the Delegate Convention of 1932.
This appointment resulted from overtures aiming. at the amalgama-
tion of the congregations of the present English District with those
of their respective geographical Districts. This committee was to
draw up reasons for an amalgamation and to take up the matter with
the English District at its next convention.

“Among reasons for an amalgamation we might mention the fol-
lowing : —

“1) An amalgamation will make for closer fraternal relations and
contacts among our pastors and result in a more closely knit synodical
body and a firmer structure of the whole organization, tending then
toward consummation in higher degree of some of the aims for which
Synod was organized and for which it conducts its work to-day.

“2) For a more unified participation in local projects, such as
city missions and young people’s work; for a closer and more effective
covering of the field and a more united defense against schism and
sectarianism; for throwing into the field in our metropolitan centers
the full weight of our forces as a united whole, with complete harmony
of interests and solidified energies,

“3) For a diffusion into wider circles of the progressive methods
in use in many of the English District churches and a quicker reali-
zation of many things for which the English District contends. It
stands to reason that the influence of men who stand for these things
will make itself felt more strongly if they exert it in the wider field.

“4) For a decided saving in money in regard to expense incurred
with relation to conventions, conferences, visitations, and the work of
mission boards and other committees. To illustrate: At a recent con-
vention of the English District only 49 lay delegates attended, while
106 congregations did not send a delegate. If every congregation had
sent its pastor and lay delegate, the total railroad fare including
Pullman would have amounted to $13,351.80. If the congregations
composing the English District had each sent their pastor and déle-
gate to the convention of the particular District in which they are
geographically located, the total fare would have amounted to
$3,334.96. Here alone a saving of $6,361.20 on railroad fare and of
$10,016.34 if Pullman fare is included. We can only guess at the sum
which is expended by pastors to attend conferences, by visitors and
officials and members of boards, in excess of what would be needed
after amalgamation takes place. The item of time required to do ‘all
this traveling would each year aggregate several years in the working-
hours of an individual. A greater loss. results for the congregations
from the inability to send a delegate, ‘because they are thus deprived
of the benefits derived from representation. at conventions.