Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1935 · 36th Convention, Cleveland › Page 169
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1935, Page 169
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 5
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Sheet 106
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 108
Sheet 111
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Sheet 125
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Sheet 137
Page 181
Page 132
Page 188
Page 134
Page 188
Page 136
Page 187
Sheet 145
Page 189
Page 140
Sheet 148
Sheet 149
Page 148
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 149
Page 148
Page 151
Page 150
Page 158
Page 152
Page 155
Page 164
Page 157
Page 156
Page 159
Page 158
Page 161
Page 160
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Sheet 172
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Sheet 180
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Sheet 184
Page 179
Page 178
Page 181
Page 180
Page 183
Sheet 190
Page 185
Sheet 192
Page 187
Sheet 194
Page 189
Page 188
Page 191
Page 190
Page 193
Page 192
Page 195
Page 194
Page 197
Page 196
Page 499
Sheet 206
Sheet 207
Page 200
Sheet 209
Page 202
Page 905
Sheet 212
Page 207
Page 206
Page 209
Sheet 216
Page 211
Page 210
Page 213
Page 212
Page 915
Page 214
Page 217
Page 216
Page 218
Page 919
Sheet 227
Page 991
Page 999
Sheet 230
Page 224
Page 995
Page 296
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 284
Page 935
Page 236
Sheet 244
Page 238
Sheet 246
Page 240
Sheet 248
Page 242
Page 248
Page 244
Page 945
Page 246
Sheet 254
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 264
Page 256
Sheet 263
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Sheet 272
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 969
Page 270
Sheet 278
Page 272
Sheet 280
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Sheet 284
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 981
Page 282
Page 288
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 989
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 800
Page 801
Page 802
Page 308
Page 804
Page 805
Page 306
Page 807
Page 308
Sheet 316
Page 310
Page 811
Sheet 319
Sheet 320
Page 314
Sheet 322
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ey. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1936. 169
true God and had worshiped Him under that name.” Longobardus,
his successor, opposed the term because he had become convinced that
the ancient Chinese had worshiped, under the name Shangdi, the
material heavens. The Dominicans and the Franciscans from the
very first protested against the idea of using the name of an idol to
designate the true God.
The question was referred to Rome for settlement; and after the
most learned men of the Catholic Church had studied and debated the
matter for almost a century, the Pope ruled in 1704 that Shangdi
should not be used “lest the Chinese be led to believe that the God
whom the Christians worship is nothing else than the material heavens
and its powers.” .
Since that time the Catholic missionaries have been using the
term Ti’en Chu, which means “Lord of Heaven.” The trouble with
that term is that it also is the name of an idol, less well known, it is
true, but still an idol.
The first Protestant missionaries, Morrison (+ 1823) and Marsh-
man (+1822), used Shen in their translation of the Bible. In doing
so, they observed the principle which, with the exception of the J esuits,
the Church had up to that time always followed, viz., that in preaching
to the heathen the missionary should not use the name of one of their
specific idols for God, but a word that includes all their deities, such
as Theos, Deus, and Gott.
About 1840 a movement was inaugurated by Medhurst, Legge,
and Staunton to substitute Shangdi for Shen wherever the English
Bible has the word God and to retain Shen in all those places where
god refers to false gods or where a discriminating adjective is added
to the name of God; e.g., 1 John 5,20: “Thou art the true Shen and
eternal Life.”
In spite of bitter opposition on the part of the more conservative
element the movement spread, until at present about ninety per cent.
of the missionaries use Shangdi and Shen as explained in the pre-
ceding paragraph.
This was the situation when our own first missionaries came to
China. When they took up the study of the Chinese language, they
were told, both by their native teachers and by missionaries of other
denominations, that the Chinese word for God was Shangdi. Later
on, when they began to read their Chinese Bible, they found that
Shangdi was used whenever the true God was meant, but that Shen
was used in the cases mentioned above. Naturally they fell in with
the ways of the country and used Shangdi and Shen in the way they
had been instructed.
That situation, however, was at best one of unstable equilibrium.
The Term Question was still a subject of lively debate among Protes-
tant missionaries. Books and pamphlets dealing with the propriety