Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 139
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 139
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
4. LIFE TOGETHER
ecclesiastical oversight of an RSO’s operations within
his district. Association schools, governed
exclusively by Synod congregations (which do not
require RSO status to receive any benefit status
could offer), should as soon as possible be
transitioned to simple district recognition—
reducing overhead and improving connections
with the appropriate district.
• The nature of calls by RSOs—especially by those
not governed exclusively by members of Synod
member congregations—should receive careful
attention. RSOs will be able to call if they agree to
conditions similar to those for other Synod calling
organizations, including resolution of call-related
disputes through the Synod dispute resolution
process.
• A revitalized program should include increased
interaction and opportunities for crosspollination among the RSOs and Synod ministries.
The task force suggests investigation of triennial
RSO conferences or other opportunities, without
dictating a specific, untried course.
• A revitalized program should include the
possibility of granting offices recovering a portion
of their administrative costs through appropriate
fees, sharing mutually with the organizations the
cost of a mutually valuable relationship.
The task force’s proposals were presented in brief to the
Council of Presidents and Board of Directors of the Synod in
November 2018. Comment was also sought from Concordia
Plan Services, the Lutheran Church Extension Fund, and a
representative swath of various types of RSOs across the
five regions of the Synod, with comments incorporated into
the final report of the task force in January 2019. The task
force feels that its proposal shows a way forward supported
by a broad consensus of Synod and RSO constituents and is
grateful for much fruitful and hopeful conversation in the
course of its work.
These proposals together, offered by consensus of the
convention task force membership at the conclusion of its
work, with direction given in the report for further
development of policy and procedure by responsible
boards and offices, propose a revitalization of the RSO
program that can be expected—with the Lord’s blessing—
to strengthen the relationships between the Synod (and the
Synod’s congregations, schools, and agencies) and the
incredible variety of recognized organizations, and to
increase the benefit of the program to both.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the report of the Res. 4-03B Task Force on
RSOs, as included as R-61 in the 2019 Workbook, be
approved as guidance for revitalization of the program by
the appropriate boards and offices of the Synod, and that
those boards and offices be directed to proceed with
Resolutions
development of policies and procedures required for its
implementation; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 6.2.1 be amended, to consolidate the
basic program definition, to clarify that congregations may
form RSOs, to clarify ecclesiastical supervisory and
oversight (cf. Bylaws 1.2.1 [k] and [o]) relationships
between the RSOs and relevant district presidents, to make
explicit Synod’s expectations of RSOs coordination in
mission (both domestic and foreign), and to clarify that
Synod does not endorse or assume financial liabilities for
the organizations (long part of policies but heretofore
omitted from the bylaws), as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
6.2.1
The granting of recognized service organization
status by the Synod signifies that a service organization,
while independent of the Synod, fosters the mission and
ministry of the church, engages in program activity that
extends the mission and ministry of the Synod, is in
harmony with the programs of the boards of the Synod, and
respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and
practice of the Synod.
(a) Under the governance and policies of its own board,
a recognized service organization operates with freedom
and self-determination as a ministry organization,
structurally independent of the Synod or districts or
member congregations of the Synod and its agencies, in
the establishment and evaluation of its own objectives,
activities, and programs, in organization and
administration, and in financial matters.
(b) The Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod shall adopt common policies for
granting recognized service organization status.A
recognized service organization respects the rights and
obligations of Synod’s members, individual and
congregational.
Respecting
proper
evangelical
supervision, counsel, and care of church workers and
congregations, a recognized service organization accepts
and agrees to facilitate the respective district president’s
ecclesiastical supervision of its rostered workers and his
role in the recognized service organization’s call process.
A recognized service organization recognizes a
congregation’s right and duty to regularly call its own
pastor and agrees not to extend pastoral ministry to a
congregation without the specific consent of the
congregation and the congregation’s district president.
(c) Each other granting office or agency may also adopt
policies and criteria approved by the Synod’s Board of
Directors to assure that that the office or agency’s unique
needs are met.A recognized service organization respects
the authority of Synod’s districts. A recognized service
organization working within a geographical district, or
with a congregation of a non-geographical district,
accepts and agrees to facilitate the ecclesiastical
oversight of the respective district’s president over the
organization’s activities within his district. The
overseeing district president shall report unresolved
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 (67TH) LCMS CONVENTION | 139