Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 139

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 139

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

4. LIFE TOGETHER
ecclesiastical oversight of an RSO’s operations within
his district. Association schools, governed
exclusively by Synod congregations (which do not
require RSO status to receive any benefit status
could offer), should as soon as possible be
transitioned to simple district recognition—
reducing overhead and improving connections
with the appropriate district.
• The nature of calls by RSOs—especially by those
not governed exclusively by members of Synod
member congregations—should receive careful
attention. RSOs will be able to call if they agree to
conditions similar to those for other Synod calling
organizations, including resolution of call-related
disputes through the Synod dispute resolution
process.
• A revitalized program should include increased
interaction and opportunities for crosspollination among the RSOs and Synod ministries.
The task force suggests investigation of triennial
RSO conferences or other opportunities, without
dictating a specific, untried course.
• A revitalized program should include the
possibility of granting offices recovering a portion
of their administrative costs through appropriate
fees, sharing mutually with the organizations the
cost of a mutually valuable relationship.
The task force’s proposals were presented in brief to the
Council of Presidents and Board of Directors of the Synod in
November 2018. Comment was also sought from Concordia
Plan Services, the Lutheran Church Extension Fund, and a
representative swath of various types of RSOs across the
five regions of the Synod, with comments incorporated into
the final report of the task force in January 2019. The task
force feels that its proposal shows a way forward supported
by a broad consensus of Synod and RSO constituents and is
grateful for much fruitful and hopeful conversation in the
course of its work.
These proposals together, offered by consensus of the
convention task force membership at the conclusion of its
work, with direction given in the report for further
development of policy and procedure by responsible
boards and offices, propose a revitalization of the RSO
program that can be expected—with the Lord’s blessing—
to strengthen the relationships between the Synod (and the
Synod’s congregations, schools, and agencies) and the
incredible variety of recognized organizations, and to
increase the benefit of the program to both.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That the report of the Res. 4-03B Task Force on
RSOs, as included as R-61 in the 2019 Workbook, be
approved as guidance for revitalization of the program by
the appropriate boards and offices of the Synod, and that
those boards and offices be directed to proceed with
Resolutions

development of policies and procedures required for its
implementation; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 6.2.1 be amended, to consolidate the
basic program definition, to clarify that congregations may
form RSOs, to clarify ecclesiastical supervisory and
oversight (cf. Bylaws 1.2.1 [k] and [o]) relationships
between the RSOs and relevant district presidents, to make
explicit Synod’s expectations of RSOs coordination in
mission (both domestic and foreign), and to clarify that
Synod does not endorse or assume financial liabilities for
the organizations (long part of policies but heretofore
omitted from the bylaws), as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
6.2.1
The granting of recognized service organization
status by the Synod signifies that a service organization,
while independent of the Synod, fosters the mission and
ministry of the church, engages in program activity that
extends the mission and ministry of the Synod, is in
harmony with the programs of the boards of the Synod, and
respects and does not act contrary to the doctrine and
practice of the Synod.
(a) Under the governance and policies of its own board,
a recognized service organization operates with freedom
and self-determination as a ministry organization,
structurally independent of the Synod or districts or
member congregations of the Synod and its agencies, in
the establishment and evaluation of its own objectives,
activities, and programs, in organization and
administration, and in financial matters.
(b) The Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod shall adopt common policies for
granting recognized service organization status.A
recognized service organization respects the rights and
obligations of Synod’s members, individual and
congregational.
Respecting
proper
evangelical
supervision, counsel, and care of church workers and
congregations, a recognized service organization accepts
and agrees to facilitate the respective district president’s
ecclesiastical supervision of its rostered workers and his
role in the recognized service organization’s call process.
A recognized service organization recognizes a
congregation’s right and duty to regularly call its own
pastor and agrees not to extend pastoral ministry to a
congregation without the specific consent of the
congregation and the congregation’s district president.
(c) Each other granting office or agency may also adopt
policies and criteria approved by the Synod’s Board of
Directors to assure that that the office or agency’s unique
needs are met.A recognized service organization respects
the authority of Synod’s districts. A recognized service
organization working within a geographical district, or
with a congregation of a non-geographical district,
accepts and agrees to facilitate the ecclesiastical
oversight of the respective district’s president over the
organization’s activities within his district. The
overseeing district president shall report unresolved

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 (67TH) LCMS CONVENTION | 139