Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 190

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 190

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

9. STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Hilfsprediger, “assistant pastors,” listed as advisory
in Const. Art. V B and XII 10 B. This is also the sense
of the earlier language between 1847–1917, e.g., 1847
Const. Ch. III 3, “Advisory members are those
orthodox pastors not empowered to vote by their
parishes, and all candidates for the ministry and the
teaching profession, and all representatives of
parishes of Synod besides the delegates.” (This is the
clear sense of Bylaw 4.2.3: “All nonvoting ordained
and commissioned ministers who are members of
the Synod within the district shall serve as advisory
delegates.”) With the acceptance of associate pastors
and the removal of assistant pastors from the list,
however, the constitutional language has been
deprived of its original sense in this respect. The
constitutional language needs to be adjusted to
maintain the original sense in a changed context:
that all pastors of a parish other than the designated
pastoral voter are advisory to the district
convention.
2. Language allowing multi-congregation parishes
to send additional advisory lay delegates needs to
be restored (Ov. 9-18): The earlier historical
practice in the Synod and the custom in certain
districts more recently has been to allow for
advisory lay representation from the congregations
of a multi-congregation parish that did not provide
the parish’s voting lay delegate. For example, the
1873 Handbuch (Handbook) provided: “While it is
hoped for and desired that the various
congregations of one pastor might each send its own
[lay] delegate…only one at a time can represent [as
voting lay delegate] the interests of the parish,” and
the 1899: “A parish consisting of several
congregations but having only one pastor can send
only one voting [lay] delegate. Others sent are…only
advisory members.” The commission, noting the
continued increase in the number of multicongregation parishes in the Synod, recommends
restoring this historic practice in explicit
constitutional language, to guarantee these advisory
delegates their voice at district conventions.
3. Confusion of individual membership with
convention representation and attendance
demands clarification (Ov. 9-18 and CCM Op. 192903): The dual-purpose nature of Const. Art. V A
(XII 10 A) and V B (XII 10 B) has resulted in
confusion. Not only are terms member, representative,
and delegate commingled, so is the sense. Successive
conventions have, on the one hand, added to Const.
Art. V B with the intention of adding categories of
commissioned ministers, and removed from it, on
the other, to grant to assistant pastors the ability to
represent their congregations as voting delegates.
The lists of Const. Art. V B and XII 10 B are
190 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 (67TH) LCMS CONVENTION

simultaneously permissive, extending the boundaries
of individual Synod membership, and restrictive,
preventing those so listed, including “professors at
Synod’s educational institutions” from serving as
voting members even if they are pastors called and
installed to member congregations and otherwise
eligible to serve as their congregations’ voting
delegates. As “dual calls” become more prevalent,
this has deprived at least one congregation that has
regularly called and installed a pastor to its service
(Const. Art. VI 3) of pastoral voting representation.
The CCM has suggested that this should be
corrected.
4. Opportunity to correct excessive duplication of
language and absence of chief categories of
individual membership (Ov. 9-39): Walther’s
theses and book on Church and Ministry, declared to
be the position of the Synod and the “pure doctrine”
on Church and Ministry in 1851–2 and reaffirmed in
2001 Res. 7-17A, holds that “The preaching office
[Predigtamt] is the highest office in the Church, from
which flow all other offices in the Church” (Office
Thesis VIII, The Church and the Office of the Ministry
[CPH, 2012], 284). These other public offices are the
auxiliary offices [Hilfsämter], which flow from the
chief office and assist it in various aspects of the
work of public ministry. All offices are
comprehended under the category of ministers of
religion; the preaching office consists of ministers of
religion—ordained (before 1986 and 1992 Bylaw and
Constitution changes, respectively, “ministers of the
Gospel”), and rostered members of the auxiliary
offices comprise the ministers of religion—
commissioned (before 1986 and 1992 changes,
“teachers” or “teachers and deaconesses”; now
including many added aspects of auxiliary ministry).
The list of categories of commissioned ministries
has been adjusted over time, and an attempt is being
made to do so again this convention. Were the broad
categories to be acknowledged, and the details left
to the bylaws, it would relieve the Synod of making
many changes to its constitution, requiring
congregational ratification, to add to or adjust the
names of the various offices. Related unclarities
relating to the non-listing of emeriti and the fact
that membership is available only to those
candidates who have previously been installed to a
first call in the Synod, should likewise be corrected.
5. Concordia University Wisconsin (CUW/CUWAA)
wishes to build upon the lay ministry program and
adopt new nomenclature in harmony with other
offices in the church such as director of Christian
education and director of Christian outreach. This
change would be reflected in Bylaw 2.6.1.1. The
director of church ministries (DCM) major and
Resolutions