Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2019 · 67th Convention, Tampa › Page 190
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2019, Page 190
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
9. STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Hilfsprediger, “assistant pastors,” listed as advisory
in Const. Art. V B and XII 10 B. This is also the sense
of the earlier language between 1847–1917, e.g., 1847
Const. Ch. III 3, “Advisory members are those
orthodox pastors not empowered to vote by their
parishes, and all candidates for the ministry and the
teaching profession, and all representatives of
parishes of Synod besides the delegates.” (This is the
clear sense of Bylaw 4.2.3: “All nonvoting ordained
and commissioned ministers who are members of
the Synod within the district shall serve as advisory
delegates.”) With the acceptance of associate pastors
and the removal of assistant pastors from the list,
however, the constitutional language has been
deprived of its original sense in this respect. The
constitutional language needs to be adjusted to
maintain the original sense in a changed context:
that all pastors of a parish other than the designated
pastoral voter are advisory to the district
convention.
2. Language allowing multi-congregation parishes
to send additional advisory lay delegates needs to
be restored (Ov. 9-18): The earlier historical
practice in the Synod and the custom in certain
districts more recently has been to allow for
advisory lay representation from the congregations
of a multi-congregation parish that did not provide
the parish’s voting lay delegate. For example, the
1873 Handbuch (Handbook) provided: “While it is
hoped for and desired that the various
congregations of one pastor might each send its own
[lay] delegate…only one at a time can represent [as
voting lay delegate] the interests of the parish,” and
the 1899: “A parish consisting of several
congregations but having only one pastor can send
only one voting [lay] delegate. Others sent are…only
advisory members.” The commission, noting the
continued increase in the number of multicongregation parishes in the Synod, recommends
restoring this historic practice in explicit
constitutional language, to guarantee these advisory
delegates their voice at district conventions.
3. Confusion of individual membership with
convention representation and attendance
demands clarification (Ov. 9-18 and CCM Op. 192903): The dual-purpose nature of Const. Art. V A
(XII 10 A) and V B (XII 10 B) has resulted in
confusion. Not only are terms member, representative,
and delegate commingled, so is the sense. Successive
conventions have, on the one hand, added to Const.
Art. V B with the intention of adding categories of
commissioned ministers, and removed from it, on
the other, to grant to assistant pastors the ability to
represent their congregations as voting delegates.
The lists of Const. Art. V B and XII 10 B are
190 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 (67TH) LCMS CONVENTION
simultaneously permissive, extending the boundaries
of individual Synod membership, and restrictive,
preventing those so listed, including “professors at
Synod’s educational institutions” from serving as
voting members even if they are pastors called and
installed to member congregations and otherwise
eligible to serve as their congregations’ voting
delegates. As “dual calls” become more prevalent,
this has deprived at least one congregation that has
regularly called and installed a pastor to its service
(Const. Art. VI 3) of pastoral voting representation.
The CCM has suggested that this should be
corrected.
4. Opportunity to correct excessive duplication of
language and absence of chief categories of
individual membership (Ov. 9-39): Walther’s
theses and book on Church and Ministry, declared to
be the position of the Synod and the “pure doctrine”
on Church and Ministry in 1851–2 and reaffirmed in
2001 Res. 7-17A, holds that “The preaching office
[Predigtamt] is the highest office in the Church, from
which flow all other offices in the Church” (Office
Thesis VIII, The Church and the Office of the Ministry
[CPH, 2012], 284). These other public offices are the
auxiliary offices [Hilfsämter], which flow from the
chief office and assist it in various aspects of the
work of public ministry. All offices are
comprehended under the category of ministers of
religion; the preaching office consists of ministers of
religion—ordained (before 1986 and 1992 Bylaw and
Constitution changes, respectively, “ministers of the
Gospel”), and rostered members of the auxiliary
offices comprise the ministers of religion—
commissioned (before 1986 and 1992 changes,
“teachers” or “teachers and deaconesses”; now
including many added aspects of auxiliary ministry).
The list of categories of commissioned ministries
has been adjusted over time, and an attempt is being
made to do so again this convention. Were the broad
categories to be acknowledged, and the details left
to the bylaws, it would relieve the Synod of making
many changes to its constitution, requiring
congregational ratification, to add to or adjust the
names of the various offices. Related unclarities
relating to the non-listing of emeriti and the fact
that membership is available only to those
candidates who have previously been installed to a
first call in the Synod, should likewise be corrected.
5. Concordia University Wisconsin (CUW/CUWAA)
wishes to build upon the lay ministry program and
adopt new nomenclature in harmony with other
offices in the church such as director of Christian
education and director of Christian outreach. This
change would be reflected in Bylaw 2.6.1.1. The
director of church ministries (DCM) major and
Resolutions