Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 160

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 160

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

160

RESOLUTIONS

tradition and history of the current 35 districts of Synod . The
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance
recognized the importance and immensity of this part of our
structure and recommended that a special task force be convened by the President of the Synod to work in consultation
with Synod’s Board of Directors and the Council of Presidents .
Whereas, Many expectations are put upon the districts
to provide support and resources to advance God’s kingdom
through healthy congregations . In an effort to bring the Synod
closer to the congregations, districts may become the primary
leaders in providing services (youth, stewardship, education,
and outreach), coordinating North American mission efforts,
leading North American human care ministries, providing
ministerial growth and support services, and giving worship
guidance and leadership; and
Whereas, “The Synod decides when and whether a district
shall be formed, divided, realigned, or merged with another or
other districts, or dissolved; determines the boundaries of a district; and approves the name of a district” (Bylaw 4 .1 .1 .3); and
Whereas, Any proposal for reconfiguration of districts initiated by the national convention of the Synod shall “include a
substantiated description of the nonviable aspects of the current district(s) on the basis of general principles of viability
adopted from time to time by conventions of the Synod, and
shall specify the problems or factors which make the adoption of the proposal advisable or necessary” (Bylaw 4 .1 .1 .3
[b] [3]); and
Whereas, General principles of viability have never been
adopted by conventions of the Synod; and
Whereas, A proposal for reconfiguration of districts is
to “provide a specific and realistic development plan for the
proposed district(s), including detailed proposals for staff personnel and financial operations” (Bylaw 4 .1 .1 .3 [b] [5]); and
Whereas, There is a need for careful, thoughtful, and
unbiased study of the function, size, and configuration of the
districts of the Synod; and
Whereas, The Atlantic, Eastern, New England, and New
Jersey districts have indicated their willingness to participate
as pilot districts for recommendations coming from a special
task force on district configuration, size, and function; therefore be it
Resolved, That the 2010 LCMS convention direct the
President of the Synod to convene a special task force to
work in consultation with the Council of Presidents and the
Synod’s Board of Directors to submit to the next Synod convention a recommendation that includes, but is not limited to,
the following:
• General principles of viability for a district as called
for in Bylaw 4 .1 .1 .3 (b) (3);
• The purpose and function of a district;
• Recommendations to improve efficiency and coordination between the Synod and districts and among the
districts, including possible changes in the number and
configuration of districts; and
2010 Convention Proceedings

• An implementation plan for any recommended changes
that will address staff personnel and financial operations, as called for in Bylaw 4 .1 .1 .3 (b) (5) .
and be it further
Resolved, That after the task force has completed its study
and determined the principles of viability, purpose, and function of a district, it be encouraged to work closely with the
Atlantic, Eastern, New England, and New Jersey districts in a
pilot program for implementing its recommendations for district configuration; and be it further
Resolved, That the work of the task force be done with great
care and sensitivity to the history and tradition of current districts, working cooperatively and collegially with each district;
and be it finally
Resolved, That the task force consist of 15 members:
• Appointed by the President of the Synod in consultation with the Board of Directors and the Council of
Presidents:
• Two representatives (one lay and one rostered member of Synod) from each of the five geographical
regions under the current district groupings of the
Council of Presidents
• One district executive
• One member of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on
Synod Structure and Governance
• One member of the Commission on Constitutional
Matters (CCM) selected by the CCM
• One district president chosen by the Council of
Presidents
• The Chief Mission Officer of the Synod
Action: Adopted (5)
(Res . 8-07 was introduced by the committee after replacing the
word “individual” with “rostered” in the final resolve . During discussion, an amendment was proposed to change “15” to “19” in
the first line of the final resolve and to add an additional bullet:
“One representative from the Atlantic, Eastern, New England, and
New Jersey districts as appointed by their district presidents .” The
motion to amend was defeated [Yes: 372; No: 752] . An amendment to change “15” to “16” in the same final resolve and to delete “One district president chosen by the Council of Presidents”
from that resolve, replacing it with “The district presidents of the
non-geographic districts” was also defeated [Yes: 474; No: 663] . A
proposed amendment to replace the third bullet in the first resolve,
“Based upon the principles of viability, purpose, and function of a
district, a recommendation for the number and configuration of districts” with new wording “Recommendations to improve efficiency
and coordination between the Synod and districts and among the
districts, including possible changes in the number and configuration of districts” was accepted as a friendly amendment . A motion
to amend the second resolve by replacing the words “the Atlantic,
Eastern, New England, and New Jersey districts” with “one district
from each of the five regions” was defeated [Yes: 234; No: 923] .
Res . 8-07 was adopted as changed [Yes: 693; No: 474] .)