Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 135
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 135
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SEMINARY AND UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
The proposed process is consistent with the process currently utilized for the selection of Synod executives .
Therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaw 3 .8 .3 .7 .2 be amended by replacing
all current bylaw wording with the following:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3 .8 .3 .7 .2 The following process shall govern the selection
of a college/university president .
(a) When a vacancy or an impending vacancy in the office of
president is known, the board of regents shall inform the campus
constituencies, the Board for University Education, the President of the Synod, an official periodical of the Synod, and other
parties as appropriate .
(1) The board of regents shall request that the Board for
University Education authorize the institution to publish a
request for nominations for the position of president .
(2) The board of regents shall request that the Board for
University Education schedule a transition review of the
campus . The review is to provide a report on the state of
the campus for use by the search committee, the board of
regents, and the candidates .
(b) The board of regents shall oversee the process of defining the institution’s needs, describing the desired characteristics
of the new president, and issuing a request for nominations .
(1) A search committee shall be formed that represents
the board of regents, the faculty, and the staff .
(2) The search committee shall prepare a description of
the needs of the institution based on listening forums, the
findings of the Board for University Education’s transition
review, and other relevant information .
(3) The search committee shall develop written criteria
that will be utilized by the committee to screen the candidates and will be utilized by the board of regents to guide the
presidential election .
(4) A person designated by the board of regents shall act
as its agent to issue a request for the nomination of candidates for the presidency of the institution . The request for
nominations shall be submitted to the parties who are authorized to nominate . Candidates may be nominated by congregations of the Synod, the Board for University Education,
the board of regents, and the faculty of the institution . The
request for nominations shall state when the nominating period closes .
(5) After the nomination period has closed, the agent
of the board of regents shall distribute an announcement to
the congregations of the Synod that lists the names of nominees who have consented to nomination . The announcement
shall contain contact information to submit correspondence
regarding the nominees, and provide a reasonable deadline
for receiving correspondence . The board of regents shall establish a procedure for processing correspondence regarding
nominees .
(c) The board of regents shall utilize the work of the search
committee to establish a short list of candidates .
(1) The search committee will provide a report to the
board of regents regarding the qualifications of the candidates with its observations and recommendations .
135
(2) The board of regents shall provide the candidates
with a report containing full disclosure of the condition of
the institution .
(3) The board of regents shall prepare a list of no less
than five candidates and submit that short list to the executive director of the Board for University Education .
(d) The short list of candidates shall receive prior approval
before the election .
(1) The executive director of the Board for University
Education shall convene a prior approval panel consisting of
the President of the Synod, the district president serving on
the institution’s board of regents, and the chair of the Board
for University Education .
(2) The prior approval panel shall meet to consider the
short list submitted by the board of regents . The panel may
choose to remove names from the list, but only with a twothirds majority vote .
(3) After the prior approval panel has completed its
work, the executive director of the Board for University
Education shall transmit the finalized list back to the agent
of the board of regents . If the amended list contains less than
two names, the election process is terminated . The board of
regents shall determine whether it will utilize the original
list of nominees or generate additional nominations as it resumes the election process .
(e) The board of regents shall elect the president of the college or university using the slate that received prior approval as
described above . The board of regents may require the president-elect to accept or decline within fifteen days .
(f) If the president-elect declines the position, the board of
regents is responsible for resuming the effort to fill the vacancy .
Action: Adopted (10)
(During discussion, an amendment to proposed Bylaw 3 .8 .3 .7 .2
(c) to insert an additional paragraph to read “The board of regents
shall provide the candidate with a report containing full disclosure of the condition of the institution” was accepted as a friendly
amendment by committee . Res . 5-06A was adopted as changed
[Yes: 887; No: 187] .)
To Revise Bylaw 3.8.3.5
Colloquy Committee for Commissioned Ministry
RESOLUTION 5-08
Overtures 5-24–28 (CW, pp. 197–202)
Rationale
It is proposed that the bylaw on commissioned minister colloquy be revised to achieve the following purposes:
1 . The policies and procedures of colloquy for commissioned ministers would be more effectively maintained
by the Synod’s Colloquy Committee for Commissioned
Ministry that administers the program and delivers the
instruction .
2 . The addition of one representative from CUEnet, which
has responsibility for providing the educational content
for commissioned ministry colloquy, and two Concordia
University System faculty representing those who are
2010 Convention Proceedings