Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 159
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 159
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNOD STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE
Action: Referred to Commission on Handbook (11)
(After explanation of the resolution and deletion of its third
whereas paragraph by the committee, discussion followed until a
motion to refer the resolution to the Commission on Handbook was
introduced and carried [Yes: 583; No: 551] . In Session 12, a motion to reconsider the referral failed [Yes: 529; No: 576] .)
Congregations Walking Together in Mission
Establishing Synod’s Priorities
To Give Priority to Circuit and District Overtures
RESOLUTION 8-06A
TF Report (CW TFR, p. 37)
Whereas,
• Laity and called workers of local congregations exercise leadership to influence one another by the power
of the Word .
• Individual congregations exercise leadership to
influence congregations of the circuit (and/or their
next-nearest peers) and of the district by the power of
the Word .
• Circuit forums exercise leadership to influence other
circuits of the district by the power of the Word .
• District conventions (consisting of all of a district’s
congregations) exercise leadership to influence other
districts of the Synod by the power of the Word .
• The Synod, through conventions, exercises the responsibility to advise the members of the Synod by the
power of the Word with respect to the collective will
and understanding of the Synod (resolutions) .
• Congregations of the Synod ratify certain resolutions (constitutional amendments and/or doctrinal
statements) .
• Members of the Synod exercise the responsibility to
honor and uphold the resolutions of the Synod .
• Members of the Synod exercise the privilege of dissent
by the power of the Word according to the provisions
of the Synod .
Therefore be it
Resolved, That a preferred process of receiving overtures to
the conventions of the Synod be established; and be it further
Resolved, That congregations be encouraged to send convention overtures to the circuit for study, discussion, and
possible amendment; and be it further
Resolved, That while all overtures sent to district and
national conventions are received, those overtures which have
been a part of the circuit’s work “to review decisions of the
Synod, to motivate one another to action, and to shape and
suggest new directions” (Bylaw 1 .3 .6) are to be given a higher
priority of consideration; and be it further
Resolved, That priority be given to overtures submitted to
the conventions of the Synod by circuits and districts, with
159
floor committees still giving consideration to all submitted
overtures; and be it finally
Resolved, That the amendments advocating giving priority
to circuit and district overtures by national Synod conventions proposed for Bylaws 3 .1 .6 .2–3 .1 .6 .2 .5; 4 .2 .1 (b)–(c);
5 .2 .3 (f); and 5 .3 .3–5 .3 .4 be adopted accordingly as shown
(“2007 Handbook Convention Version,” TB, pp . 232–233,
311, 320–321) .
Action: Declined (12)
(During discussion, an amendment was proposed to reinstitute
the language of Bylaw 5 .3 .3, ruled by the chair to be a substitute
motion and declined consideration by the assembly [Yes 481; No:
542] . After lengthy discussion, Res . 8-06A was not adopted [Yes:
488; No: 617] .)
Congregations Walking Together in Mission
in Larger Clusters (Districts)
To Study Future District Function
and Configuration
RESOLUTION 8-07
TF Report (CW TFR, pp. 25–26); Overtures 8-51–55
(CW, pp. 238–240)
Preamble
Districts are large ecclesial clusters (congregations and
circuits) established by the Synod for the care, support,
advice, ecclesiastical encouragement, service, coordination,
and counsel that will foster the congregation’s greater participation in God’s mission . Present district boundaries were
determined by the national Synod with the intention of providing the most efficient and effective support and ecclesiastical
encouragement and counsel to local congregations . Districts
(all congregations together) also serve as grassroots mission
councils and as leadership avenues for in-depth study, influence, and persuasion by the Word of God, thereby serving as
channels to persuade and influence the national Synod through
overtures and expanded leadership (assisting in setting the
agenda for the national convention) .
According to the data received from all 35 districts in 2008,
the districts are vastly different in size—ranging from 53 to
372 congregations and from 11,000 to 166,000 communicants .
Staffing in the districts ranges from 1 .5 full-time-equivalent
(FTE) workers to 28 FTE workers . (A total of 386 FTEs work
for the 35 districts) . District budgets vary from $570,000 to
more than $7,000,000 . Annual unrestricted remittances from
districts to the national Synod vary from $60,000 to nearly
$3,000,000 .
Is the current make up of districts with its disparity in
sizes the most effective and efficient means to support the
congregations of Synod? What is the purpose and function
of the districts and how do they help the local congregation
carry out its ministry? This is a topic that deserves careful and
thoughtful study so that we can be about our Lord’s work . This
study needs to be done with great care and sensitivity to the
2010 Convention Proceedings