Concordia Historical Institute Digital Archive

Collection › Eckhardt's Reallexikon › index › christusperfönlichevereinigung

Eckhardt's Homiletisches Reallexikon, 1907–1917

A cumulative subject index to seven Missouri Synod periodicals, compiled by E. (Ernest) Eckhardt (1868–1939) and printed at St. Louis between 1907 and 1917. Under each headword it sets numbered theses, and beside each thesis the places where the periodicals had treated it — by volume and page, running twenty years past the last of Der Lutheraner's own registers. Where the archive holds the volume a citation names, the citation below is a link to that page.

The alphabetical run is here in full, Abendmahl through Wunder, assembled from five scans: two archive.org items, a pair from Google Books that closes what had looked like a gap in the middle of the alphabet, and the archive.org tail. With it are the Beichtreden appendix, Eckhardt's own printed Register, and the separate 1913 treatise Die Schule, bound in with the later volumes and kept here under its own heading.

clear

Headwords are spelled as Eckhardt set them, so the filter folds the differences that would otherwise hide them — Sklaverei finds Sclaverei, Konkordienformel finds Concordienformel. What you see listed is always the printed spelling.

4,478 entries under 828 headwords, carrying 129,203 citations and 2,331 fragments too damaged to read · built 2026-09-16. uncorrected OCR

The German below is machine transcription of the 1907–1917 print (tesseract, Fraktur model) and has not been proof-read against the page. Read it as a finding aid: the citations are what it is for, and a garbled word is a defect of our OCR, not of Eckhardt.

1 entry under christusperfönlichevereinigung.

Chriſtus. —Perfönliche Vereinigung

—

ten ſein könne. — Damit lehren ſie eine Zertren⸗ nung der Perſon. ſ. § 9. e. 4. Der Menſchheit Chriſti ſei wohl die göttlich⸗ Perſönlichkeit mitgeteilt worden, aber nicht das ö göttliche Weſen. . Keine Natur nimmt Widerſprechendes in ſitz auf. Anm. a. Sie ſagen: Wie iſt das möglich, daß keine Vermiſchung und Verwandlung ſtattfindet, wenn eine wirkliche Durchdringung beider Naturen gelehrt wird? — Daß es in der Bibel ſteht, genügt uns. Anm. b. Dem Vorwurf, daß ſie die Perſon Chriſti zer⸗ reißen, ſuchen ſie ſo zu entgehen, daß ſie ſagen: 1. Weil die Gottheit überall iſt, ſo iſt ſie auch da. wo die Menſchheit iſt und alſo mit ihr vereinigt. 2. Wie der Ozean mit der Seeſtadt Antwerpen verbunden iſt, oder wie eine gerade Linie einen Kreis an einem Punkte berührt, ſo iſt Chriſti Gott⸗ heit mit der Menſchheit vereinigt. — Damit iſt aber der Unterſchied zwiſchen der perſönlichen Vereini— gung und der Vereinigung Gottes mit den Gläu⸗ bigen aufgehoben. Anm. c. Der Unterſchied zwiſchen der reformierten und lutheriſchen Kirche beſteht nicht nur in der Abend⸗ mahlslehre, ſondern ſitzt viel tiefer in einer Lehre von der Perſon Chriſti, die, wenn ſtreng durchgeführt, das ganze Chriſtentum vernichtet. e. Die Kenotiker lehren eine Verwandlung. Das Wort ward Fleiſch, gerade wie Waſſer Wein wurde. Zu ihnen gehört z. B. Kahnis. „Das Wort ward Fleiſch“ ſagt nicht ein Annehmen oder Anziehen der menſchlichen Natur, ſondern ein Übergehen in dieſelbe aus. Hofmann. Chriſtus hörte auf, Gott zu ſein, um Menſch zu werden. ſ. § 15. Thomaſius. Nachdem Chriſtus verſchiedene Eigenſchaften im Himmel gelaſſen hat, ſind beide Naturen verwandelt und vermiſcht zu einer dritten. f. Schwenkfeldtianer. Die menſchliche Natur Chriſti iſt mit ſeiner göttlichen Natur in eins verſchmolzen. g. Die Siebentagsadventiſten leugnen, daß in Chriſto zwei Naturen ſind. h. Katholiken. Die Vereinigung iſt nicht real. Die Gottheit iſt an vielen Orten, wo die Menſchheit nicht iſt. ſ. § 9. e. Anm. Viele lehren eine perſönliche Vereinigung. In⸗ dem ſie aber die Mitteilung der Eigenſchaften leugnen. heben ſie dieſelbe tatſächlich wieder auf.

AI translation · machine

[...at once.] - By this they teach a tearing apart of the person. See § 9, e. 4. The divine personality was indeed communicated to Christ's humanity, but not the divine essence. 5. No nature takes into possession anything contradictory [to itself]. Note a. They say: How is it possible that no mingling and transmutation occurs, when a real interpenetration of both natures is taught? - That it stands in the Bible is enough for us. Note b. To escape the charge that they tear apart the person of Christ, they say: 1. Because the deity is everywhere, it is also present where the humanity is, and thus united with it. 2. As the ocean is connected with the port city of Antwerp, or as a straight line touches a circle at one point, so Christ's deity is united with his humanity. - But this abolishes the distinction between the personal union and God's union with believers. Note c. The difference between the Reformed and Lutheran churches does not lie only in the doctrine of the Lord's Supper, but sits much deeper, in a doctrine of the person of Christ which, if carried through consistently, destroys the whole of Christianity. e. The Kenoticists teach a transmutation. The Word became flesh, just as water became wine. Among them belong, for example: Kahnis. "The Word became flesh" does not mean an assuming or putting on of the human nature, but a passing over into it. Hofmann. Christ ceased to be God in order to become man. See § 15. Thomasius. After Christ left various properties behind in heaven, both natures were transformed and mingled into a third. f. Schwenkfeldians. Christ's human nature has been fused into one with his divine nature. g. The Seventh-Day Adventists deny that there are two natures in Christ. h. Catholics. The union is not real. The deity is present in many places where the humanity is not. See § 9, e. Note. Many teach a personal union. But by denying the communication of properties, they in fact abolish it again.

  • Mich. 88, 49 margin
  • Mich. 88, 49. 48 margin
  • Mich. 88, 53 margin
  • Mich. 88, 53 margin
  • Neb. 1901. 66 margin
  • Neb. 1901. 66. 67 margin
  • O. 1903, 34 margin
  • Baier 3, 38 margin
  • Baier 3, 38. 37 margin
  • Mich. 86, 55 margin
  • Mit. 89, 19 margin
  • Mich. 88, 51 margin
  • Mich. 88, 51. 68 margin
  • O. 1903, 35 margin
  • Mich. 86, 46 margin
  • Mich. 86, 60 margin
  • L. W. 4, 289 What Is Now Meant by the Further Development of the Doctrine of the Lutheran Church? margin
  • Mich. 88. 42 margin
  • Mich. 88. 42. 86, 42 margin
  • Mich. 88. 42. 86, 42, 25 margin
  • Günth. 150 margin
  • Günth. 150 margin
  • Mich. 88, 48 margin
  • Mich. 88, 48. 86, 55 margin
  • Baier 3, 38 margin
  • Baier 3, 38. 34 margin
  • Mich. 88, 57 margin

vol a, printed page 540 · scan: bub_gb_3EAUAAAAYAAJ/n0542

A citation shown like this names a volume the archive does not hold — most of Der Lutheraner and Lehre und Wehre past Jahrgang 10, and the five other series Eckhardt indexes, none of which are here. Those references are printed as Eckhardt set them rather than hidden: the reference is the useful thing even when we cannot serve the page. Page images of the Reallexikon itself are not served in this build; the scan note under each entry gives the item and image index in the archive.org copy.