LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1920, Page 83

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

fh. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1920. 83

| APPEALS.
(Germ. Rep., pp. 237. 238.)

elected two special committees to ‘whom the following
, referred : —

referred to the Board of Support.
of Mr. F¥. Rindt, of White City, Kans. — The matter

E al of Mr. and Mrs. H. F. Pieper, of Edwardsville, Il. —

nt was dismissed as unwarranted.
Feal‘of O. H. Pannkoke, New York City. — The “rpeal was

to the fact that the charges of O. H. Pannkoke against
of the Lutheran Witness were not specific, and that proofs
me were not adduced, Synod refrained from judging in the
t declared its willingness to take up the charge and accusa-
nst the editors of the Lutheran Witness through a com:
her appointed by the President or elected by Synod, if
in the proper form.

INTERSYNODICAL MATTERS.
(Germ. Rep., pp. 239—241.)

ommittee in charge of the report of Synod’s representatives
ersynodical conferences reported that, by the blessing of
Hintersynodical conferences of Missouri and Wisconsin with
[ Iowa have borne fruit, in that the representatives of the
nods engaged in the discussions have agreed to a series
on the doctrine of man’s conversion, thus ‘warranting
$that the synods hitherto divided by doctrinal differences
to a better mutual understanding in this doctrine.
committee reported that it had examined said theses and
em not only conformable to the Scriptures and the con-
q the Lutheran Church, but also a concise presentation of
stural doctrine of conversion, offering a sufficient basis for
i in this doctrine.

Bd resolved to have these theses printed and sent to all con-
wy the respective District Presidents for inspection, dis-
° and examination. ;

as, however, the goal of the intersynodical conferences — |

the doctrine of election — has not yet been achieved, Synod
fu hermore —

of Pastor M. Flachsbart, of St. Charles, Mo. — The