Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1920 · 31st Convention, Detroit › Page 66

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1920, Page 66

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

66 Proceedings of Thirty-First National Conver, sf

ix

to. permit the Board to place beneficiaries, in -charge %
committee of the District in which they reside, should ‘that be
desirable; and to authorize the Board to issue -annuity. bo
cording to, which the Board of Support administers the capital fe
donor, paying him an. annuity based on his age, the capital $3
to the Support Fund on the death of the donor... _ .
A detailed plan for systematic support (pension plan) based
years of service ($11 per year of service) was presented, If a
the Board recommends that the pension plan apply only to the ne
cases arising after December 31, 1920, old cases to be provided for
according to the present method. (For the plan in full, see.q Bei:
Report, pp. 161 ff.) _
The committee in charge of this matter reported as follows:
Wuereas, Two methods of support, to go into effect J: anuary ‘I,
1921, are contained in the plan proposed by the Board of Sw
which methods, however, cannot be readily carried out since dissats
faction would thereby easily be aroused in certain circles of Synod
Wuereas, Furthermore, the needed capital for carrying out theg
plans is not at hand and cannot be readily obtained, and ;
Wuereas, The support of needy servants of the Church and their
dependents has also in the past three years been systematic and mors
ample; therefore ; :

We Recommend: .
1. That the old method of support be retained for the next threg
years;

- "9. That the proceeds of the L. L. L. Fund be turned over to theig
treasury of the Board of Support, and that also in future this treasury
be supplied with offerings of congregations (20 cents per communicant:
member ought to be raised annually), gifts, and legacies, that more
ample support may be given; Bg

3. That Synod advise conferences and District Synods carefully
to consider the entire: plan of systematic support, and report ny’
suggestions and recommendations to the Board of Support, to thee he
that a riper and better plan may be presented to Synod three

hence.
ACTION.

These recommendations of the committee were adopted by Synod.
Synod furthermore resolved to grant the three petitions of the Bo
of Support, and authorize from this treasury the support of incap
‘tated servants of the Church who are called by benevolent, e
tional, and mission societies and are advisory members of a syn
District.

“The auditing committée reported that it had examined the ®
ords of the treasurer. of the Board of Support and found same to.
correct. The committee called attention to the efficient and econ

i
ee

y