Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1920 · 31st Convention, Detroit › Page 66
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1920, Page 66
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
66 Proceedings of Thirty-First National Conver, sf
ix
to. permit the Board to place beneficiaries, in -charge %
committee of the District in which they reside, should ‘that be
desirable; and to authorize the Board to issue -annuity. bo
cording to, which the Board of Support administers the capital fe
donor, paying him an. annuity based on his age, the capital $3
to the Support Fund on the death of the donor... _ .
A detailed plan for systematic support (pension plan) based
years of service ($11 per year of service) was presented, If a
the Board recommends that the pension plan apply only to the ne
cases arising after December 31, 1920, old cases to be provided for
according to the present method. (For the plan in full, see.q Bei:
Report, pp. 161 ff.) _
The committee in charge of this matter reported as follows:
Wuereas, Two methods of support, to go into effect J: anuary ‘I,
1921, are contained in the plan proposed by the Board of Sw
which methods, however, cannot be readily carried out since dissats
faction would thereby easily be aroused in certain circles of Synod
Wuereas, Furthermore, the needed capital for carrying out theg
plans is not at hand and cannot be readily obtained, and ;
Wuereas, The support of needy servants of the Church and their
dependents has also in the past three years been systematic and mors
ample; therefore ; :
We Recommend: .
1. That the old method of support be retained for the next threg
years;
- "9. That the proceeds of the L. L. L. Fund be turned over to theig
treasury of the Board of Support, and that also in future this treasury
be supplied with offerings of congregations (20 cents per communicant:
member ought to be raised annually), gifts, and legacies, that more
ample support may be given; Bg
3. That Synod advise conferences and District Synods carefully
to consider the entire: plan of systematic support, and report ny’
suggestions and recommendations to the Board of Support, to thee he
that a riper and better plan may be presented to Synod three
hence.
ACTION.
These recommendations of the committee were adopted by Synod.
Synod furthermore resolved to grant the three petitions of the Bo
of Support, and authorize from this treasury the support of incap
‘tated servants of the Church who are called by benevolent, e
tional, and mission societies and are advisory members of a syn
District.
“The auditing committée reported that it had examined the ®
ords of the treasurer. of the Board of Support and found same to.
correct. The committee called attention to the efficient and econ
i
ee
y