Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 31 (1909) › Page 12
The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1909, Page 12
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/31)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
12
The Lutheran Pioneer.
The great missionary apostle desired the prayers
of the Christians for himself and for the cause in
which he labored. ‘This ought to move us to pray
earnestly’ and diligently for our missionaries and
for the mission cause. By prayer we help our rep-
resentatives in the mission field.
If we are sincere in our prayers, we shall also
be cheerful and liberal givers, and thus gladly help
in the mission work with our gifts. We must not
be like the man who prayed for a poor family in
the neighborhood, but never gave them anything
from his well-filled barn. He acted like a hypo-
crite. A praying Christian is also a paying Chris-
tian. For the spread of Christ’s kingdom he gladly
gives as God has prospered him:
Let us not forget to help our representatives in
the mission field with our prayers and with our
gifts for the mission treasury!
How Much Water?
A colored preacher in the South was annoyed
by Baptist proselyters, who worried his people with
their notion that immersion is the only valid mode
of: baptism, and that every one who wanted to be-
come a Christian. or join the church must be
“dipped.”? This induced him to preach on the sub-
ject to instruct his people, and he made use of a
good illustration to show the fallacy of the immer-
sionist notion, as follows:
“My brethren,” said he, “if I were to sprinkle
some water on the head of a person, but would not
say any words while doing it, would that be bap-
tism ?”
“No,” was the answer from the congregation.
He asked again: “If I would dip a person
under water once forward or once backward, but
would not say any words with it, would that be
baptism ?”
“No,” was again the answer.
Again he asked: “If I were to dip a person
under water three times forward, or three times
backward, and say no words to it, would that be
baptism ?””
*No,” was again the answer.
He continued: “If I were to take a person into
a river, or creek, or baptistery, and have him stand
in the water up to his waist, and then pour or
sprinkle a handful of water on his head, but say
no words with it, would that be baptism?”
“No,” was again the answer.
“But if,” now said the preacher, “in all these
different ways of baptizing persons, I had said:
‘I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of
the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, would that have
made it baptism?”
“Yes,” was the answer that came from the con-
gregation.
“Well, then,” said the preacher, “don’t you see
that baptism does not depend on the amount of
water that is used, nor on the manner in whieh it
is applied, but on the Word of God connected with
the water? That makes it baptism, and it does
not matter how it is performed, if the Word of
God is properly used with it.”
- a Oe
Silenced.
When a certain young university student of Ger-
many was traveling through Baden, he espied a vil-
lage with a very fine church, and remarked to sev-
eral intelligent-looking men near by: “These good
people might have put their money to better use
had they erected a hall of music or a club house in-
stead of so fine a church.”
“What have you against the church ?”
his neighbor.
“What intelligent man
nowadays?” was the reply.
people go to church.”
“Then T must be an ignoramus,” remarked one.
“And I must be one also,” said another.
“And I belong to the same company,” chimed
in a third. ;
It so happened that the first was a university
professor in Leipsic; the second, an official of high
rank in the government; and the third, president
of a college in Berlin.
When the young man discovered what a fool he
had made of himself, he withdrew from this dis-
tinguished company. — Lx.
remarked
sares for the church
“None but ignorant
——— + -—#e-e- -
A Subject for Eternity.
A preacher had spoken in his sermon on the
subject of Christ as the Deliverer. On his way
home from church he said to one of his hearers,
an old Scotchman: “I didn’t finish the subject.”
“Ah, man,” was the reply, “you didn’t expect
to finish, did ye? It-will take all eternity to finish
telling what Christ has done for man.”