LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters — Minutes St. Louis, Missouri — July 17, 2025, Page 6

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

•

A described but as yet unelaborated divergence from historical practice, with regard to which no
bylaw challenge other than the present has apparently been raised.

The commission discussed responses received from a request for input extended to the boards and
presidents of the seminaries and universities of the Synod, the Concordia University System, and the
President of the Synod. It assigned a member to lead research and drafting for consideration at the
commission’s September meeting.
134. Meaning of Constitution Article III, Objective 7: Uniformity and Variety (25-3066)
By emails of June 22–23, a pastor, a member of the Synod, requested an opinion on the following:
Question:

Article III, Objective 7 states: “[The Synod, under Scripture and the Lutheran Confessions,
shall: 7.] Encourage congregations to strive for uniformity in church practice, but also to
develop an appreciation of a variety of responsible practices and customs which are in
harmony with our common profession of faith.” Specifically, would the CCM give a
definition to, and explain what is meant by, the phrase “variety of responsible practices and
customs”? Does this word “variety” contradict the phrase “strive for uniformity”? What is
trying to be reconciled are the two statements that appear to be incongruent. How does one
have “uniformity in church practice,” while at the same time “a variety of responsible
practices”?

As the question relates to the assignment given to the Commission on Theology and Church Relations in
2019 Res. 5-11, regarding Const. Art. III 7 and in light of Augsburg Confession VII and Formula of Concord
Solid Declaration XI, “to prepare a study document on the issue of the relationship between unity in doctrine
and uniformity and variety in practice, together with a Bible study on this issue specifically designed for
congregational use, discussion, and guidance” (Proceedings, p. 155), input was sought from the sister
commission as required by Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (b).
The commission discussed the input received from its sister commission and initial impressions on the item.
135. Plan for Next Meeting
The commission confirmed its previously tentative plan for a September 12–13 in-person meeting.
136. Meeting Review and Adjournment
The agenda being concluded, the commission adjourned with a benediction.

John W. Sias, Secretary

CCM Minutes – July 17, 2025 – Page 101