Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 171

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 171

Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION
form the accuser, any other District President involved, and
the involved member, which shall terminate the matter. If
the synodical President fails to act within 60 days after receipt of the formal written complaint or accusation, the accuser may present a formal written request to the synodical
President for the forming of the Referral Panel, which request the synodical President must grant. If the provisions
set forth in Bylaw 2.27 b 1−3 have not been carried out, the
Referral Panel shall carry out these provisions in the
process of making its determination whether or not to initiate formal proceedings.
d. If the synodical President or the Referral Panel concludes that the facts form a basis for expulsion of the member under Article XIII of the Constitution, the synodical
President in commencing the formal proceedings shall:
1. provide to the member a written notification of the
member’s suspended status under Bylaw 2.25;
2. provide to the member a written statement of the
matter which sets forth the facts and states that he is requesting expulsion of the member from the Synod in accord
with Article XIII of the Constitution;
3. provide to the member a written notification that the
member has 15 days from the date of receipt of the statement of the matter to advise the synodical President that
there is a desire to have the matter heard and resolved.
Failure by the member to file such written request for hearing and resolution within the 15-day period shall be
deemed to be consent to expulsion from membership in the
Synod.
e. If the request for hearing (paragraph d 3 above) is
made, the President of the Synod shall inform the chairman of the Council of Presidents who shall form a Hearing
Panel of District Presidents within thirty (30) days of the
request in accordance with the provisions in this bylaw. At
that time, the synodical President shall forward to the
chairman of the Council of Presidents the statement of the
matter and a written memorandum describing the manner
in which there was compliance with the mandate of Matt.
18:15–16 and “previous futile admonition” (Constitution
Art. XIII), as well as all of the provisions of Bylaw 2.27 a–d.
1. A Hearing Panel consisting of three District Presidents selected as follows, excluding the involved District
Presidents, shall conduct the hearing:
a) One District President selected by the accused (a District President, if he is the accused, may not choose himself);
b) One District President selected by the synodical President;
c) A third District President selected by the other two
Hearing Panel members. If the two Hearing Panel members cannot agree on the third Hearing Panel member, then
such third member shall be chosen by blind draw from
among the remaining District Presidents with the blind
draw administered by the chairman of the Council of Presidents and audited by witnesses;
d) If a Referral Panel was formed, the three District
Presidents that served in that capacity are not eligible to
serve on a Hearing Panel.

171

2. Upon receipt of a request for hearing, the chairman
of the Council of Presidents shall promptly notify the accused and the synodical President of their respective right
to choose one Hearing Panel member and direct that the
identity of their selection be transmitted to the chairman
of the Council of Presidents within 15 days from the date
of such notice. If either party declines to make a selection
within 15 days, the chairman of the Council of Presidents
shall then make such selection within 5 days.
3. When two Hearing Panel members have so been chosen, the chairman of the Council of Presidents shall
promptly notify them of their selection to the Hearing
Panel and direct that they select the third member of the
Hearing Panel within 10 days and notify the chairman of
the Council of Presidents of their selection.
4. Within 15 days after the Hearing Panel is constituted,
it shall select one of its members as chairman, who shall
then, after conferring with the accused and the synodical
President, select a date and location within 45 days after
the panel is constituted to determine when and where the
Hearing Panel will consider the matter.
5. The chairman of the Council of Presidents shall forward to the Hearing Panel the statement of the matter together with the written memorandum describing the manner in which there was compliance with the mandate of
Matt. 18:15–16 and “previous futile admonition” (Constitution Art. XIII), as well as all of the provisions of Bylaw 2.27
a−d.
6. The Hearing Panel and all parties shall follow the
guidelines as set forth in Bylaw 2.26 e 6 a−f and h–l and
the following:
While the matter is still undecided or while an appeal is
contemplated or pending, publicity shall not be given to the
issues in the matter by any of the persons involved during
any part of the procedures outlined in this bylaw with one
exception. Due to the fact that this bylaw procedure deals
with a District President or an officer of the Synod, which
necessarily means that the case will most likely have a high
public exposure, as the ecclesiastical supervisor the synodical President, at his discretion, may carry out his duties to
properly advise the Synod as the needs dictate in order to
“promote and maintain unity of doctrine and practice”
(Constitution Art. XI B 3) and in order to provide counsel,
care, and protection for all of the members of the Synod
(Constitution Art. III 8, 9).
f. Upon completion of the hearing, the Hearing Panel
shall deliberate and then issue its written decision within
30 days, a copy of which shall be mailed to the accused District President or officer, the synodical President, the accuser and his District President, and the chairman of the
Council of Presidents. The decision of the Hearing Panel
shall have no precedential value and shall be final and
binding subject to appeal by the accused or by the synodical
President. The decision shall be carried out by the synodical President and be publicized as deemed appropriate
under the circumstances by the synodical President if not
appealed by the accused or by the synodical President.
g. Within 15 days after receiving the decision of the
panel, the accused, or the President of the Synod if a ques2004 Convention Proceedings