Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2004 · 62nd Convention, St. Louis › Page 75

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 2004, Page 75

Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT
• Lutheran musicians could not play the organ or other
musical instruments in non-Lutheran weddings or funerals and some were even excommunicated for doing
so.
• Lutherans were not allowed to dance and were often
chastised and even excommunicated for doing so.
• Lutheran pastors and people were not allowed to pray
with anyone, anytime, anywhere, outside our own
church.
• Women were not allowed to sit in church together with
the men.
• Many congregations were in conflict over whether the
pastor should continue to preach and teach in German
or should begin to do so in English.
Today our Synod views these practices from the past,
staunchly defended on the basis of Holy Scripture at the
time, as matters not specifically commanded or forbidden
in Holy Scripture and thus matters of Christian freedom
about which there is little, if any, current dissension.
However, serious doctrinal controversies—internal and
external—have been instrumental in defining our Synod
over the years. It is helpful to review a few of them to remind ourselves that we have always lived as part of the
church militant.
• As already mentioned, there was doctrinal debate and
controversy before the Synod was even organized. The
Saxons who came to this country wrestled with the
fundamental question, “Are we church or not?” It was
not until the Altenburg Debates that they were able to
answer that question, “Yes!” and move forward.
• In the early 1840s there was sharp disagreement about
the nature and authority of the pastoral office as it relates to the congregation. Significant schisms resulted.
• The Synodical Conference was fractured in 1872 over
the doctrine of election. The Predestinarian Controversy resulted in both the Ohio Synod (1881) and the
Norwegian Synod (1883) severing their relations with
the Synodical Conference.
• In the 1940s the LCMS rejected fellowship with the
American Lutheran Church, exposing differences
within the Missouri Synod itself. The so-called “Statement of the Forty-Four” raised concerns about the necessary basis for church fellowship and the role and
function of extra-confessional doctrinal statements in
the life of the church.
• Certainly the most painful internal controversy in the
Synod’s history focused on the authority of Holy Scripture, polarizing much of the Synod during the 1960s
and 1970s. A group of pastors and congregations left
the Missouri Synod and formed the Association of
Evangelical Lutheran Churches, one of the predecessor bodies of today’s Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America.
These brief examples from the Synod’s history remind
us that there have been theological and doctrinal disputes
both inside the Synod and between the Synod and other
bodies, generating fervent argument and resulting in bitter divisions and fractured fellowships.

75

Yet, our Synod endured in remaining true to our Scriptural and Confessional principles. While most of the issues
mentioned above are no longer in contention, we nevertheless continue to experience in our Synod today difficulty,
disagreement, and even conflict regarding numerous other
issues, mostly regarding the practical application of our
doctrinal principles. A few examples will suffice:
• Close Communion—There is little, if any, disagreement among us on the doctrine of the Lord’s Supper.
But there is disagreement regarding the policies of admission to Holy Communion, namely, who should be
allowed or even encouraged to receive the sacrament
at the altars of our congregations, campus ministries,
and military chaplaincies.
• Church and Ministry—Despite our theological clarity
on the subject, there exists in some corners of our
Synod a lack of agreement regarding the role, responsibility, authority, and accountability of both the office
of pastor and the role of laity in the church.
• Traditional and Contemporary Worship—Disagreement exists on whether certain contemporary worship
expressions employ doctrinally pure resources faithfully and whether certain traditional worship expressions do so meaningfully or effectively.
• The Service of Women in the Church—Since 1969 our
Synod has consistently expressed its collective belief
on the teaching of Holy Scripture, allowing women to
vote and hold certain offices, but not to occupy the pastoral office. Still, some in our Synod would severely restrict the involvement of women in the church at many
levels, while others would favor no restrictions at all.
Perhaps your congregation or one in your Circuit is
wrestling with one or more of these issues, which can become divisive. As indicated throughout this report, the
Synod itself is certainly no stranger to disagreement and
divisiveness. The proliferation of political propaganda that
has filled many of your mailboxes over the months prior to
this convention is indicative of such disagreement.
In times of such difficulties and challenges, it is important to recall the words of Ephesians 4:
Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit
through the bond of peace. There is one body and one
Spirit—just as you were called to one hope when you
were called—one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God
and Father of all, who is over all and through all and
in all. (Ephesians 4:3-6)

Maintaining such unity in the Spirit has not been easy
in the history of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod,
nor is it easy today, as other issues continue to arise at various times, on differing subjects.
More recently, the subjects of unionism and syncretism,
participation in services with other Christians, and events
with non-Christians have been a source of concern and
challenge. In the past I have quoted the report of Dr. J. A.
O. Preus to the 1981 Convention of the Synod. I do so
again, in summary format:
I have hoped that during my years in office some
greater clarity could be developed among us as to what
really is unionism and what must be dealt with in a disciplinary way, as over against things that might appear
to some to be a compromise of the Word of God but to

2004 Convention Proceedings