Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1971 · 49th Convention › Page 71
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1971, Page 71
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THE CONVENTION ESSAY 71
tive divine activity and that it is associated with the
atoning death of Christ.” §
This then is the message we bring to our world —
a grand message of reconciliation and peace with God.
But things look even better as we examine more closely
what Paul tells us. Note first the way Paul puts it in
verse 18: “God, who through Christ reconciled us to
Himself,” and in verse 19: “God was in Christ reconcil-
ing the world to Himself.” Note that God reconciled us
to Himself. God initiated the plan, and God did the
work. God is the subject of the reconciling, and man is
the object. In great love God reached out in Christ to
do away with our alienation from Him. The apostle
states this with great clarity in Romans 5. For example,
in verse 8 he states, “God shows His love for us in that
while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.” In verse
10 he says, “If while we were enemies we were recon-
ciled to God, by the death of His Son.” From this we see
that it is God in action all the way. There is no initiative
on the part of man. It is God’s love, God’s grace, God’s
gift all the way.
But how was the reconciliation effected? Did God
as an indulgent father merely say, “Boys will be boys,”
or “Let’s shake hands and make up”? Did He send
Jesus merely as a great man, a great humanitarian to
show mankind the way, to demonstrate how men ought
to live together? Is this the ambassador’s message of
reconciliation?
Let it be clearly said that such notions sell the New
Testament message short. Paul is very loud and clear
in saying that reconciliation cost something, indeed the
greatest price ever paid. For man to be reconciled
meant that Christ had to step into man’s shoes and be
judged by God as man’s substitute.
See how clearly this thought comes through in Paul’s
words in 2 Cor. 5:14: “We are convinced that one has
died for all; therefore all have died.” One for all. The
Greek word hyper used here and translated as “for”
clearly indicates a substitution is being made. It stresses
that God acted in behalf of man. The same construction
is used in John 11:50, where Caiaphas says that it is
expedient that one man should die for the people. Paul
uses it in Galatians 3:13, where he flatly states, “Christ
redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become
a curse for us.” The same grammatical construction ap-
pears in 2 Corinthians 5:21, where Paul says, “For our
sake He made Him to be sin who knew no sin, so that
in Him we might become the righteousness of God.”
Two great facts stand out. The first is that Christ
was sinless in His personal relationship with God and
man. Peter writes, “He committed no sin” (1 Peter
2:22). The author of the Letter to the Hebrews describes
Jesus as “One who in every respect has been tempted
as we are, yet without sinning.” (4:15)
The second great fact is that God identified Christ
with us in respect to our guilt. He took our place. “For
our sake He made Him to be sin,” says Paul. (2 Cor.
5:21)
The Old Testament provides a symbolism for what
happened when Christ took our place and died for us
on Calvary. Leviticus 16 tells the story of the scapegoat.
On the great day of atonement Aaron the high priest
killed a goat and sprinkled its blood on the Ark of the
Covenant in the Holy of Holies for the sins and trans-
gressions of Israel. Then he came out into the court-
yard. While the people watched, Aaron laid both his
hands on the head of the live goat and “confessed over
him all the iniquities of the people of Israel and all their
transgressions and all their sins,” and he “put them upon
the head of the goat.” The goat was then led into the
wilderness, carrying with him all the iniquity of the
people. (Lev. 16: 20-22)
This practice pointed to Christ, who as the Lamb of
God was loaded with the iniquity of all mankind and
thus “became a curse for us” (Gal. 3:13). The writer of
the Letter to the Hebrews clearly says, “For it was fit-
ting that we should have such a high priest, holy, blame-
less, unstained, separated from sinners, exalted above the
heavens. He has no need, like those high priests, to offer
sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for those
of the people; He did this once for all, when He offered
up Himself.” (7:26-27)
This is the heart of the Gospel. Isaiah put it most
beautifully, “Surely He has borne our griefs and carried
our sorrows: yet we esteemed Him stricken, smitten by
God, and afflicted. But He was wounded for our trans-
gressions; He was bruised for our iniquities; upon Him
was the chastisement that made us whole, and with His
stripes we are healed.” (53:4-5)
You see also that Paul clearly states that the object
of this reconciliation is that “we might become the
righteousness of God” (2 Cor. 5:21). The beautiful im-
plications of this phase of reconciliation are often
sounded forth in the Lutheran Confessions. The For-
mula of Concord states: “Our righteousness before God
consists in this that God forgives us our sins purely by
His grace without any preceding, present, or subsequent
work, merit, or worthiness, and reckons to us the righ-
teousness of Christ’s obedience, on account of which we
are accepted by God and are regarded as righteous.” ®
Some have said that it is not proper to think that
God required a penalty to be paid so that His sense of
justice might be satisfied and reconciliation brought to
pass. These persons remind us that in the New Testa-
ment God is never said explicitly to be reconciled to
man. He is rather the subject of the verb and is said to
reconcile man to Himself. They point out that God
loved man already before the reconciliation. They then
conclude that therefore no satisfaction needed to be
offered for man’s sin. God's mind didn’t have to be
changed.
But such a view misses the point of the tension be-
tween God’s great love for the sinner and His abiding
wrath against sin. Scripture is clear in ascribing to God
definite opposition to everything that is evil. Both the
Old and the New Testament speak of the wrath of God.
In Isaiah 54:8 God says: “In overflowing wrath for
a moment I hid My face from you, but with everlasting
love I will have compassion on you, says the Lord, your
Redeemer.” Paul states plainly in Romans 1:18: “The
BREE PRP NOMENA RR DB AV EEA BCS? YA OA PSA A OS MAD WS HEROES TN AA RSE AOR SBN SRN RE EE RES ME PO AORTA TE IO ISSO ST SPD AER IOP RITE REO EOL YN ES RELA RO RTO IIE MEE AANA AE MEF PRE: PARE PAPAS NEE RY RG SESE SUR PS RRS TRON NE NOMA