Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1971 · 49th Convention › Page 71

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1971, Page 71

front matter 1 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THE CONVENTION ESSAY 71

tive divine activity and that it is associated with the
atoning death of Christ.” §

This then is the message we bring to our world —
a grand message of reconciliation and peace with God.
But things look even better as we examine more closely
what Paul tells us. Note first the way Paul puts it in
verse 18: “God, who through Christ reconciled us to
Himself,” and in verse 19: “God was in Christ reconcil-
ing the world to Himself.” Note that God reconciled us
to Himself. God initiated the plan, and God did the
work. God is the subject of the reconciling, and man is
the object. In great love God reached out in Christ to
do away with our alienation from Him. The apostle
states this with great clarity in Romans 5. For example,
in verse 8 he states, “God shows His love for us in that
while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.” In verse
10 he says, “If while we were enemies we were recon-
ciled to God, by the death of His Son.” From this we see
that it is God in action all the way. There is no initiative
on the part of man. It is God’s love, God’s grace, God’s
gift all the way.

But how was the reconciliation effected? Did God
as an indulgent father merely say, “Boys will be boys,”
or “Let’s shake hands and make up”? Did He send
Jesus merely as a great man, a great humanitarian to
show mankind the way, to demonstrate how men ought
to live together? Is this the ambassador’s message of
reconciliation?

Let it be clearly said that such notions sell the New
Testament message short. Paul is very loud and clear
in saying that reconciliation cost something, indeed the
greatest price ever paid. For man to be reconciled
meant that Christ had to step into man’s shoes and be
judged by God as man’s substitute.

See how clearly this thought comes through in Paul’s
words in 2 Cor. 5:14: “We are convinced that one has
died for all; therefore all have died.” One for all. The
Greek word hyper used here and translated as “for”
clearly indicates a substitution is being made. It stresses
that God acted in behalf of man. The same construction
is used in John 11:50, where Caiaphas says that it is
expedient that one man should die for the people. Paul
uses it in Galatians 3:13, where he flatly states, “Christ
redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become
a curse for us.” The same grammatical construction ap-
pears in 2 Corinthians 5:21, where Paul says, “For our
sake He made Him to be sin who knew no sin, so that
in Him we might become the righteousness of God.”

Two great facts stand out. The first is that Christ
was sinless in His personal relationship with God and
man. Peter writes, “He committed no sin” (1 Peter
2:22). The author of the Letter to the Hebrews describes
Jesus as “One who in every respect has been tempted
as we are, yet without sinning.” (4:15)

The second great fact is that God identified Christ
with us in respect to our guilt. He took our place. “For
our sake He made Him to be sin,” says Paul. (2 Cor.
5:21)

The Old Testament provides a symbolism for what
happened when Christ took our place and died for us

on Calvary. Leviticus 16 tells the story of the scapegoat.
On the great day of atonement Aaron the high priest
killed a goat and sprinkled its blood on the Ark of the
Covenant in the Holy of Holies for the sins and trans-
gressions of Israel. Then he came out into the court-
yard. While the people watched, Aaron laid both his
hands on the head of the live goat and “confessed over
him all the iniquities of the people of Israel and all their
transgressions and all their sins,” and he “put them upon
the head of the goat.” The goat was then led into the
wilderness, carrying with him all the iniquity of the
people. (Lev. 16: 20-22)

This practice pointed to Christ, who as the Lamb of
God was loaded with the iniquity of all mankind and
thus “became a curse for us” (Gal. 3:13). The writer of
the Letter to the Hebrews clearly says, “For it was fit-
ting that we should have such a high priest, holy, blame-
less, unstained, separated from sinners, exalted above the
heavens. He has no need, like those high priests, to offer
sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for those
of the people; He did this once for all, when He offered
up Himself.” (7:26-27)

This is the heart of the Gospel. Isaiah put it most
beautifully, “Surely He has borne our griefs and carried
our sorrows: yet we esteemed Him stricken, smitten by
God, and afflicted. But He was wounded for our trans-
gressions; He was bruised for our iniquities; upon Him
was the chastisement that made us whole, and with His
stripes we are healed.” (53:4-5)

You see also that Paul clearly states that the object
of this reconciliation is that “we might become the
righteousness of God” (2 Cor. 5:21). The beautiful im-
plications of this phase of reconciliation are often
sounded forth in the Lutheran Confessions. The For-
mula of Concord states: “Our righteousness before God
consists in this that God forgives us our sins purely by
His grace without any preceding, present, or subsequent
work, merit, or worthiness, and reckons to us the righ-
teousness of Christ’s obedience, on account of which we
are accepted by God and are regarded as righteous.” ®

Some have said that it is not proper to think that
God required a penalty to be paid so that His sense of
justice might be satisfied and reconciliation brought to
pass. These persons remind us that in the New Testa-
ment God is never said explicitly to be reconciled to
man. He is rather the subject of the verb and is said to
reconcile man to Himself. They point out that God
loved man already before the reconciliation. They then
conclude that therefore no satisfaction needed to be
offered for man’s sin. God's mind didn’t have to be
changed.

But such a view misses the point of the tension be-
tween God’s great love for the sinner and His abiding
wrath against sin. Scripture is clear in ascribing to God
definite opposition to everything that is evil. Both the
Old and the New Testament speak of the wrath of God.
In Isaiah 54:8 God says: “In overflowing wrath for
a moment I hid My face from you, but with everlasting
love I will have compassion on you, says the Lord, your
Redeemer.” Paul states plainly in Romans 1:18: “The

BREE PRP NOMENA RR DB AV EEA BCS? YA OA PSA A OS MAD WS HEROES TN AA RSE AOR SBN SRN RE EE RES ME PO AORTA TE IO ISSO ST SPD AER IOP RITE REO EOL YN ES RELA RO RTO IIE MEE AANA AE MEF PRE: PARE PAPAS NEE RY RG SESE SUR PS RRS TRON NE NOMA