Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1967 · 47th Convention, Philharmonic Hall › Page 71
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1967, Page 71
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SARI a CI SE OMI LEE NN AMEE B OE TSE EE aN, AO
sy
THE DOCTRINAL ESSAY 71
death by the sword. They inherited the promises be-
fore the apostolic age. Obviously the confessors at
Nicea did not justify the existence of the church or rest
its authority on the lineage of the church, honorable as
it is, when they described the church as apostolic.
Not “Historic Episcopacy”
The apostolic continuity of the church is not based
on a theory or myth of apostolic succession, with
claims for what is often called the “historic episcopacy,”
that Christ intended His authority to be transmitted
and continued in a succession of bishops. If this theory
were to be accepted seriously, it would mean that the
dominical promise of Christ that the gates of hell would
not prevail against His church would be dependent on
episcopal succession. Under the theory of apostolic suc-
cession, should there ever come a time in which Chris-
tendom would crumble to the point where there was
not a single lay congregation on earth, the continuity
of the body of Christ would be assured by the ex-
istence of, say, three bishops and their successors. The
difficulty with this notion, as several have pointed out,
is that it makes the Word dependent on an office rather
than the office dependent on the Word of God.
While there are many sincere proponents of apos-
tolic succession as a necessary ingredient to the con-
tinuity of the church, there is no justification in Scrip-
ture or in history for the idea that bishops have been
made custodians of the continuity of the church. Indeed,
even Roman Catholic theologians have been pointing
out lately that no one can take the place of Christ,
who Himself promised to be with His church alway,
even unto the end of the world. No one is the custodian
of the Holy Spirit, who Himself will lead the church
into all truth. The bearer of the truth is the church it-
self, the people of God, the body of Christ. Christ Him-
self has assured the continuity of the church, for He
Himself is its Head.
A special gift of God to the church is the ministry
of the Gospel. The ministry itself receives special gifts
for the good of the body, for the proclamation of the
Word, for the administration of the sacraments. How-
ever, all are gifts to the whole church. The ministry is
not regarded in Scripture or in history as the custodian
of the continuity of the church. Indeed, when the min-
istry comes to be looked upon as a collection of cus-
todians rather than bearers of the Word, the church
has always been weakened, and lay people have become
spectators rather than participants in the life -of the
church. ;
Apostolic Church Life
_ Life in the apostolic church is described pretty
graphically in the account of Pentecost. Peter preached,
people were baptized, some three thousand of them, and
then they continued in the apostles’ doctrine, fellowship,
breaking of bread, and in prayers. They persisted in
learning from the apostles, taking part in the fellowship
of believers, sharing in the fellowship meals, and engag-
ing not in the formalities of piety but in prayers that
meant something now that Christ had authorized them
to pray in His name. There was about the early Chris-
tian community not the “odor of heartiness” which
Kierkegaard so much deplored in the Danish church of
his day, but joyous and unostentatious fellowship and
worship without exhibitionism, that have always charac-
terized the church at its best.
First of all, the apostolic church persisted in, was
devoted to, the teaching of the apostles or being taught
by the apostles, The didache of the apostles, their teach-
ing of Christ—the teaching they had received from
Him and gave regarding Him — was the spark igniting
the flame that burns brightly even today. This is what
makes the church apostolic in the 20th century: that
people who are alive today are warmly attached to the
apostolic doctrine and are willing to be taught the
teaching of the apostles. The prayer of our Lord has
come true: there will always be those who believe on
Him through the word of these men whom He chose to
be His apostles.
The Word of the apostles is the Word of Christ Him-
self, “He that heareth you heareth Me,” said Christ.
The Word of the apostles is the Word of God to us
today, coming to us with all the authority of God. The
same authority that stood behind the preaching of the
apostles stands behind the written Word the apostles
have given us in the New Testament and the proclama-
tion of that Word today.
Not Their Own Word
The apostles themselves were conscious of the fact
that they were bringing Christ’s Word to the world, not
their own word. “We preach not ourselves,” said Saint
Paul, “but Christ Jesus our Lord, and we ourselves
your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who first said,
‘Let there be light,’ has shined in our hearts to give us
the light of the knowledge of His glory in the face of
Jesus Christ.” (2 Cor. 4:5-6)
We have God’s Word for all of this in our own
humble preaching: It pleased God to save the world in
this way, through this Man, who humbled Himself unto
death and was given a name which is above every name;
it pleased God to convey to the world this saving
knowledge through the foolishness of preaching and
teaching. .We have this treasure in earthen vessels, so
to speak, that the glory might be of God.
Same as Old Testament
The New Testament is the Word of God in the same
way that the Old Testament is the Word of God. Of the
Old Testament St. Paul said all Scripture is given by in-
spiration of God for certain profitable uses to make a
man mature in the faith. The Word of the apostles,
now that Christ has come, has the same authority and
the same purpose. The church has been built upon the
foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ
Himself being the Keystone. The church believes not
in the apostles and prophets but in Jesus Christ, in
whom the whole building is fitly framed together. The
authority for the message and for faith is the teaching
of the apostles and the word of the prophets, inspired
by God for a great purpose: that people might hear of