Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1959 · 44th Convention, San Francisco › Page 28

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1959, Page 28

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

28 DOCTRINAL ESSAY

The principle “Scripture alone” means also for us as Lutherans
that Scripture is its own interpreter; not the wisdom of men, not
the mind of the interpreter who dares to rise above Scripture and
dictate to Scripture what it must mean; least of all an ecclesiastical
authority which presumes to be able to determine with absolute
certainty the intended meaning of difficult Scripture passages.
And when we say “Scripture alone,” we are also saying: Scripture
in its immediate and most obvious sense, regardless of whether
that sense meets or does not meet the approval of the interpreter.
Thus no one has the right arbitrarily to excise or expurgate por-
tions of Scripture as though he were editing for high school students
a novel by Walter-Scott or Washington Irving. No one has the
right to interpolate, or repartition, or rearrange sections of a Bib-
lical book to suit his own fancy. Least of all is it within the right
of anyone to empty the text of Scripture of its obvious meaning on
the grounds that thought patterns of Scripture are couched in
ancient and no longer intelligible mythological terms, and to fill
those emptied words with other meanings suggested by the mind
of the interpreter. The Lutheran interpreter must therefore reject
the following views and practices:

1. co-ordinating with Scripture “ecclesiastical tradition”;

2. placing any authority — popes, councils, or symbols — above
Scripture;

3. viewing Scripture as the record of the natural evolution of
the faith of Israel and the early church;

. viewing Scripture as a book of inferences made by men from
God’s mighty acts;

. all views which regard the prophetic and apostolic Word as
no more than a unique but fallible, human witness to revela-
tion;

. failure to acknowledge the organic unity and essential
Christocentricity of the Old and the New Testament;

- all attempts to get beyond or away from the “plain sense”
of Scripture by means of allegorical, demythological, or
existential methods of interpretation.

. arbitrary excision, interpolation, or emendation of the text;

. every interpretation of Scripture which is not in accord with
Scripture’s central teaching, namely, justification by faith
in Christ; ‘

. failure to hear Scripture on its own terms and in its own
categories by the attempt to make it conform to a pre-
conceived system of thought;

- abuse of the recognition that Scripture employs literary

types by arbitrarily assigning certain sections of Scripture
to myth or legend.

: These eleven theses are a summary compiled by Merrill Kluhsman
for my course Sola Scriptura. (Spring quarter, 1958—59)

NAMES BAe PTR GOS LPS A Cio Re ae Se

s
tans

&
E

biases tad alte