Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1983 · 55th Convention › Page 119
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1983, Page 119
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
nt Bohimann, Dear Sisters and Brothers in
rist:
he very beginning I want to congratulate you,
¢ Bohlmann, on your reelection, and I want to
ulate the convention on having such good sense
t.and to do it so quickly. I’ll admit as well that
yawhat envious of that kind of majority. I think I
een on more ballots than any other living person
‘Lutheran Church in America, because it always
e- awhile to get elected. I remember in Chicago
after the election I was kidding with Jack
fe was congratulating me on my election, and I
“Well, Jack, I don’t know much about politics, so
ou fellows will have to teach me more about
d-Jack said, ‘“Now, Jim, anybody who gets
yy six votes on the fifth ballot, and stands up
é convention and talks about his mandate had
ot talk to the rest of us about politics.”
gs indeed a pleasure to bring you greetings from the
1 Church in America. Especially in this anni-
ary year of the birth of Martin Luther, that “Father
fie faith,’ as even a renowned Roman Catholic
ilar'entitles him, we celebrate together our heritage.
have an identity as Lutherans, a way of under-
\ding ourselves, that gives us a unique sense of
sion.
fhe Lutheran Church in America and The Lutheran
h—Missouri Synod also have distinctive ways of
ving themselves. We must have a healthy respect
h other’s distinctiveness, an appreciation for our
fess, and with candor we must also be willing to
nine the different directions our paths are taking.
of us knows who we are and why we act as we do.
Bdo not always recognize the right of the other to have
ifferent view and to take a different action from our
I propose that we examine some of those self-
e share a confessional, Biblical, and contextual
léness. We acknowledge the same writings to be our
a fession of faith. From the earliest ecumenical creeds
the last paragraph of the Book of Concord, we point to
ia@éntical documents and claim them to articulate
curately the life, faith, and witness of our churches.
“were forged in the crucible of a historical struggle in
lich the confession of Jesus Christ as the only Lord
id Savior took on new cogency and meaning. That
sssion has been the thread by which a living
ition has been woven for us.
Thus we each affirm and assert that we are con-
essional churches. In the present moment that founda-
on has as much significance for us ag at any previous
tinie in our history. In fact, many events in the last few
fears have caused us to reflect anew on how our
heology is properly applied to the world and its
blems.
‘Both of us are Biblical churches. In fact, we value our
GREETINGS OF THE BISHOP
OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
Greetings of the Bishop of the Lutheran Church in America
confessional documents so highly because we see them
to be accurate expositions of Holy Scripture, which
alone has the authority to bind human conscience and
to be the source and norm by which the life and work of
the church are to be judged.
We do have different approaches to the Bible and its
exposition, but both of us share the conviction that the
books of the Old and New Testaments are divinely
inspired and that they have an integrity and an
authority that are central for us. In a time when the
normative function of Scripture is questioned, we should
speak our common convictions loudly and clearly.
We live and witness in the same context, in both the
same temporal and geographical arenas. Our culture is
not the most amicable for the nurture and expression of
genuine spirituality; we face a growing secularity, an
increasing tendency to interpret life solely in economic
and political terms, an erosion of ethical standards, and
a frightening dependence on weapons of ultimate de-
struction for national security. Powers and principali-
ties today indeed tempt us to fail to fear, love, and trust
in God above all things.
Again, our members share that world and culture.
They are often brothers and sisters, parents and chil-
dren, members of the same family who belong to both of
ourchurches. They are plagued with the same questions,
engaged in similar struggles to express Christian dis-
cipleship. Our failure at times to speak with one voice
out of our confessional heritage is often baffling and
confusing to members of our congregations and cer-
tainly to people beyond them.
That we can point to much that is of such great
importance that we have in common is a source of
discomfort and pain as we must also recognize our
differences. We have to look at them, for they give us
trouble that our churches need to seek to overcome. And
121