# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1983_S119 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) nt Bohimann, Dear Sisters and Brothers in rist: he very beginning I want to congratulate you, ¢ Bohlmann, on your reelection, and I want to ulate the convention on having such good sense t.and to do it so quickly. I’ll admit as well that yawhat envious of that kind of majority. I think I een on more ballots than any other living person ‘Lutheran Church in America, because it always e- awhile to get elected. I remember in Chicago after the election I was kidding with Jack fe was congratulating me on my election, and I “Well, Jack, I don’t know much about politics, so ou fellows will have to teach me more about d-Jack said, ‘“Now, Jim, anybody who gets yy six votes on the fifth ballot, and stands up é convention and talks about his mandate had ot talk to the rest of us about politics.” gs indeed a pleasure to bring you greetings from the 1 Church in America. Especially in this anni- ary year of the birth of Martin Luther, that “Father fie faith,’ as even a renowned Roman Catholic ilar'entitles him, we celebrate together our heritage. have an identity as Lutherans, a way of under- \ding ourselves, that gives us a unique sense of sion. fhe Lutheran Church in America and The Lutheran h—Missouri Synod also have distinctive ways of ving themselves. We must have a healthy respect h other’s distinctiveness, an appreciation for our fess, and with candor we must also be willing to nine the different directions our paths are taking. of us knows who we are and why we act as we do. Bdo not always recognize the right of the other to have ifferent view and to take a different action from our I propose that we examine some of those self- e share a confessional, Biblical, and contextual léness. We acknowledge the same writings to be our a fession of faith. From the earliest ecumenical creeds the last paragraph of the Book of Concord, we point to ia@éntical documents and claim them to articulate curately the life, faith, and witness of our churches. “were forged in the crucible of a historical struggle in lich the confession of Jesus Christ as the only Lord id Savior took on new cogency and meaning. That sssion has been the thread by which a living ition has been woven for us. Thus we each affirm and assert that we are con- essional churches. In the present moment that founda- on has as much significance for us ag at any previous tinie in our history. In fact, many events in the last few fears have caused us to reflect anew on how our heology is properly applied to the world and its blems. ‘Both of us are Biblical churches. In fact, we value our GREETINGS OF THE BISHOP OF THE LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA Greetings of the Bishop of the Lutheran Church in America confessional documents so highly because we see them to be accurate expositions of Holy Scripture, which alone has the authority to bind human conscience and to be the source and norm by which the life and work of the church are to be judged. We do have different approaches to the Bible and its exposition, but both of us share the conviction that the books of the Old and New Testaments are divinely inspired and that they have an integrity and an authority that are central for us. In a time when the normative function of Scripture is questioned, we should speak our common convictions loudly and clearly. We live and witness in the same context, in both the same temporal and geographical arenas. Our culture is not the most amicable for the nurture and expression of genuine spirituality; we face a growing secularity, an increasing tendency to interpret life solely in economic and political terms, an erosion of ethical standards, and a frightening dependence on weapons of ultimate de- struction for national security. Powers and principali- ties today indeed tempt us to fail to fear, love, and trust in God above all things. Again, our members share that world and culture. They are often brothers and sisters, parents and chil- dren, members of the same family who belong to both of ourchurches. They are plagued with the same questions, engaged in similar struggles to express Christian dis- cipleship. Our failure at times to speak with one voice out of our confessional heritage is often baffling and confusing to members of our congregations and cer- tainly to people beyond them. That we can point to much that is of such great importance that we have in common is a source of discomfort and pain as we must also recognize our differences. We have to look at them, for they give us trouble that our churches need to seek to overcome. And 121