Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1979 · 53rd Convention › Page 70

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1979, Page 70

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

i
§

70 PRESIDENT’S REPORT

New Lutheran Churches

I should report that during the past biennium two
new Lutheran churches have come into being, the
Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church and the Lat-
vian Evangelical Lutheran Church. Since a small num-
ber of our congregations have asked to be released from
our membership in order to join these church bodies,
which are basically ethnic in character, I believe we
ought to wish these people Godspeed and to establish as
close a relationship with the new church bodies as
possible. I hope that in the case of the congregations
which have left us in order to join these groups, we will
continue to welcome their pastors to our conferences,
since many of these pastors were members of our
church, and to give them the kind of support and help
which we can give to groups who have suffered so much
through being driven out of their home countries, living
as refugees, losing everything they had, seeing their
countries taken over by the Russians, and enduring so
many problems. These people deserve our love and our
friendship. Especially at the grassroots level, dialog
and discussions ought to take place with them.

Other Interchurch Activities

Ialso had the pleasure of attending a meeting of the
International Lutheran Conference, meeting with the
partner-church presidents in Papua New Guinea, in
August of 1978. The meeting was positive and helpful.

I am happy to report that the action of the Dallas
convention, in establishing fellowship with the Selb-
staendige Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirche in Ger-
many, was personally reported by me to these brethren
in October of 1978, when I had occasion to visit with
representatives of all of the churches in Europe affil-
iated with The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. I
believe the brethren are most appreciative of this action,
and I must report that relations between our respective
churches are very good.

I also had occasion to journey into East Germany
(the DDR), where the churches have not yet united into
one body, but I was also very pleased to report to these
brethren, living and working under such difficult cir-
cumstances, that Missouri loves them and has not
forgotten them. The meetings were very faith-
strengthening, and I came away with new appreciations
for the difficulties under which they work and with new
appreciation for their faith and their conviction.

During the past biennium the Hong Kong Mission
became The Lutheran Church—Hong Kong Synod, a
partner church. This was carried out in consultation
with the Board for Missions and the Board of Directors,
and I’m happy to report that virtually all of the diffi-
culties which had existed in Hong Kong over such a
long period have now been satisfactorily settled.

Support of Study of Fellowship

Finally I ask the support of every delegate, every
District, pastor, and congregation for the forthcoming
program of the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations (which will begin this fall) dealing with the

study of church fellowship. This grows out of our
relationship with The American Lutheran Church but
is much broader. We really need to look at this subject,
study the Scriptures, the Confessions, and the history of
our Synod, and then ask some very hard questions. We
need the input of every pastor and congregation. We
need to look at the world in which we live today and try
to determine how we as an orthodox and confessional
church relate to other churches. We need to determine at
every level what kind of a church, doctrinally and
theologically speaking, we shall be as we move into the
’80s and beyond. The questions are not simple. Neither
are the answers.

Problems

We have some problems and they deserve attention.
We have a continuing problem with some 70—80 uncert-
ified Seminex graduates who are serving in congre-
gations of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, but
again, our District Presidents are dealing with the
matter, as they are with a very small number of dual-
membership congregations. Little by little an
increasing number of Seminex students are enrolling in
the colloquy program. I believe that patience and
evangelical treatment will ultimately solve this problem
and the congregational problem also.

One of the perhaps unnoticed casualties of the
controversy has been a gradual and almost impercep-
tible downgrading of the pastoral office in our Synod. I
believe that now is the time to speak out on this matter
and to say that, as President of the Synod, I support
every one of our pastors in carrying out his ministry
wherever he may be. Many of our men are suffering
from lack of understanding and respect on the part of
either their own people or others, and a constant
harassment of some of them has been undertaken.

I would earnestly urge all of our lay people to deal
with their pastors and with synodical and District
officials in love and in compassion. Some very tragic
stories could be told of events in the past several years
where ministries have been destroyed, where pastors
have been improperly dealt with. We have procedures,
we have District Presidents and Circuit Counselors,
and we have the Scriptural admonitions for dealing
with problems between pastor and people. Let us use the
procedures which God and the Synod have given us and
not resort to unkindness, to public vilification, and to
actions which ill befit Christian people. God has estab-
lished the office of the ministry in order that Christ’s
people may be properly nurtured in faith, and this office
is to be held in honor and high repute. I hope that the
respect for the pastor can return to its former high state.

This is not to say that this is a general problem, but it
is of sufficient importance to make it necessary for me to
make these remarks. I hope that out of the controversy
can come a better understanding between pastor and
people as to their respective roles in the church in the
light of the fact that all of us are forgiven through the
blood of Christ and all of us are given His commission to
be His witnesses.

I could also add a few words regarding our hard-

z
i
i
i