Collection › The Lutheran Pioneer (St. Louis) › Vol. 45 (1923) › Page 63

The Lutheran Pioneer St. Louis — 1923, Page 63

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96

Concordia Seminary Library, St. Louis (scholar.csl.edu/lutheran_pioneer/45)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

_ tion here.

The Lutheran Pioneer.

63

The Kodaikanal School for Missionaries’ Chil-
dren is faring splendidly. Mr. and Mrs. Bachmann
are evidencing sterling qualities in the management
of the school and the Bergheim. The latter com-
prises no more than four small stone cottages, in
consequence of which many missionaries will spend
THill-leave,
with some, began in January; the last will remain
through until September. Several families are
always in one cottage together, —and the cottages
have only four or five rooms.

the hot season on the plains this year.

English services for Americans are held at
Kodaikanal in Mr. Bachmann’s dining-room every
Sunday morning; Tamil services for the servants
and munshis (language tutors) in the afternoon.
Such regularity of divine worship is highly appre-
fact,
especially in India divine worship becomes a very
distinct need, and a pleasure hardly comparable to
any other.

Because of a dearth of competent munshis the
writer and his wife have joined a language class
conducted at Kodaikanal.

To-day, more than a decade or two ago, India
presents unparalleled fields for the entry of the
Cross. May we not in charity suppose, knowing
as we do that in some circles of our Chureh at
home there is a truly assertive demand for expan-
sion in missions both continental and abroad, that
the day is advancing when the eloquent appeal of
the foreign field will find a somewhat proportionate
answer from the host of our Christians in America?
Here on the scene of conflict we ery: God speed
that day! BE. H. MEINZEN.

ciated by the families of missionaries. In

How Much Am I Asked to Give?
Marx 12, 41—44.

“Jesus sat over against the treasury.” He is
still watching. All our giving is in His sight.

“And beheld,” not critically, or with faultfind-
ing, but delighted. y

“How the people cast money into the treasury.”
“Wlung it.” They liked to do it.
- “And many that were rich cast in much.”
Thank God for consecrated wealth. ;

“And there was a certain poor widow.” Name-
less? Yes, but so were the “rich.” No discrimina-

“And she threw in,” just as the saints “cast

- s, \

their crowns” before the throne. It’s the same

“word. © the lordliness, the prodigality of her giv-
jing! She gave with the abandon of a spendthrift
king!

Is that a climax or an anti-
Call it a mill, the tenth part of a cent,
and you exaggerate.

“And He called His disciples unto Him.” It
was “too good to keep.” He was afraid that they
would not. “catch on”; that the rattle of the Phar-
isees’ gold would distract their attention.

“T.say unto you that this poor widow hath cast
more in than all.” Relatively? Yes. But actually
“more than all.” For they quit. She is still “fling-
ing it in.”

“For all they did cast in of their abundance.”
“Superfluity,” “overflow.” Oh, that the. Church of
Christ would do even that much — reach the’

“Two mites.”
climax ?

‘standard of the Pharisees and give some of their

“overflow” money to carry on the Lord’s work!
When that standard of giving is reached, the
Church will have millions for missions; for the
“overflow” alone is reckoned by hundreds of mil-
lions. ‘

“But she of her want.” “Penury,” contrasted”
with “superfluity.” God bless this princely giver!
The dictionary of your experience does not contain
the word “want,” but is crowded with the synonyms
of “superfluity.”

“Did cast in all that she had, even all her living.”
Every coin she had in all the world.

Two mites—half a mill! How small! But
the collective voice of the ages cries out: “O woman,
great is thy munificence!”

2 Cor. 8,9: “For ye know the grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich, yet for your
sakes He became poor, that ye through His poverty
might be rich.”/ =a
LS se

BOOK TABLE.

Popular eI of the Bible. Book 1. Old Testa-
ment. Vol. I: Genesis to Esther. By Paul FE. Kretz-
mann, Ph. D., D. D. Concordia Publishing House,
St. Louis, Mo. Durable cloth-binding. 798 pages.
$5.00, postpaid.

Many of our readers will be pleased to hear that the
third volume of Dr. Kretzmann’s commentary has been put
on the market. They need not be told that the contents
of this volume are in full keeping with those of the first
two, though, of course, circumstances compelled the com-
mentator to be shorter and pithier in his comments.
dipping into the volume here and there, we are astonished
at the author’s ability to condense a whole ordinary para-

ph into one sentence, and not at the expense either of
the lucidity or simplicity of his Janguase: May this Popu-
lar Commentary become truly popular, not only among us,
but also outside of our circles. ;