Collection › LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters — Minutes (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2005 › Page 2
LCMS Commission on Constitutional Matters — Minutes St. Louis, Missouri — November 28−29, 2005, Page 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Source: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (files.lcms.org)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
105. Conduct of Board of Directors and Its Chairman (05-2432)
In a July 11, 2005 letter, a pastor of the Synod submitted a series of questions regarding the conduct of
the Board of Directors and of its chairman with regard to 2004 convention Resolution 7-21. The questions
were forwarded to the Board of Directors and the Synod’s legal counsel for consultation. Because the
responses from the Board and legal counsel were only lately received, the Commission agreed to
postpone finalizing its opinion to allow time to take this input from legal counsel and the Board of
Directors into consideration.
106. Authority of the Board of Directors (05-2438)
A pastor member of the Synod in a letter dated September 10, 2005, after calling attention to several
bylaws describing the authority of the Board of Directors and of the President of the Synod, asked a series
of questions regarding the following action of the Board of Directors during its August, 2005 meeting:
WHEREAS, It is most important that all activities sponsored by and/or conducted under
the auspices of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod are in accordance with the
doctrine and practice of our Synod; and
WHEREAS, Concerns have been expressed regarding the theological positions or
articulations of some of the presenters at past LCMS National Youth Gatherings;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Board of Directors evangelically encourage the Board for District and
Congregational Services of the Synod, in consultation with the Office of the President, to
evaluate carefully and thoroughly all presenters invited to future National Youth
Gatherings to ensure that they are faithful to the doctrine and practice of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod; and be it further
Resolved, That the Board of Directors express its concerns regarding potential liability or
adverse financial consequences connected with future National Youth Gatherings; and be
it finally
Resolved, That the Board of Directors requests the Board for District and Congregational
Services to report to the Board of Directors at its February, 2006 meeting the progress
that is being made in addressing and resolving the issues that have been discussed
between the Board of Directors and the Board for District and Congregational Services
regarding the LCMS National Youth Gathering.
After noting the repeated references in the resolution to “doctrine and practice” and to “theological
positions or articulations,” the questioner asked:
Question 1: In light of Bylaw 3.3.5.4, by what authority did the Board of Directors pass a resolution
dealing with “doctrine and practice” and “theological positions or articulations”?
Question 2: In light of Bylaws 3.3.1.1 and 3.3.1.1.1, did the Board of Directors usurp the authority of the
synodical President?
Question 3: If the Board of Directors did in fact usurp the authority of the synodical President, should the
resolution adopted by the Board of Directors be declared null and void?
57